Both also are imposing new
restrictions on ammunition sales.
Many of the preferred measures stayed about the same, but bans on assault weapons and large - capacity magazines or
restrictions on ammunition purchases were determined to have more of an effect on mass shootings than everyday gun violence.
To that end, one of the first things the legislature did in its 2013 session was to pass a tougher assault weapons ban that included
restrictions on ammunition and the sale of guns, as well as provisions to keep guns from the mentally ill who make threats.
The deal includes a tougher assault weapons ban and
restrictions on ammunition and the sale of guns.
Not exact matches
That law — which Senate Republican leadership supported, but many GOP state senators opposed — enacted universal background checks,
restrictions on assault weapons,
restrictions on the capacity of
ammunition magazines, among other provisions.
They called for
restrictions on high - capacity
ammunition clips and also for greater vigilance by caregivers, so that mentally ill individuals that also are dangerous don't have access to weapons, and especially not such high - powered ones.»
But
on Tuesday, proponents of the legislation were hit by a setback that gave
ammunition to those opposed to
restrictions.
Certain features of the law, such as
restrictions on the size of
ammunition magazines, have proven to be unpopular with some county sheriffs across the state.
Soon, state game commissions were formed, funded by taxes
on firearms and
ammunition, and hunting seasons, bag limits, and sex
restrictions helped deer populations recover.
Sporting groups are opposed to any
restrictions on lead - based
ammunition, arguing that there's no clear evidence that it is dangerous when used to hunt deer and other animals.
Hunting groups say any
restriction on traditional
ammunition will price many people out of hunting, because the alternatives — steel, copper or tungsten shells — can cost as much as six times more.
Still, the study seems likely to serve as
ammunition for advocates and public health officials who favor
restrictions on BPA.
The 2nd amendment, as interpreted by SCOTUS, grants to individuals the right to bear arms (guns), but the right of the government to place reasonable
restrictions on the types of weapons, how they operate and limitations
on restrictions of the type of
ammunition, or the extent of the firepower of those weapons, have been clearly approved.
Legislatures have numerous policy options for the regulation of weapons that are consistent with the Second Amendment, including universal background checks, purchase waiting periods, increasing age limits,
restrictions on military style weapons and high - capacity
ammunition magazines.