A county or municipality may place additional requirements or
restrictions on dangerous dogs if the requirements or restrictions:
Not exact matches
The
restrictions are based
on assumptions that certain breeds are inherently
dangerous, that such
dogs can be reliably identified and that the
restrictions will improve public safety, the study states.
BSL
restrictions may include a total breed ban, or some lesser rules such as (but not limited to): higher licensing fees, registering the
dog as
dangerous with local governments, liability insurance coverage, mandatory sterilization, muzzling
on public property, placement of warning signage
on private property, and standardized caging requirements.
We have regulations that keep
dangerous wild life out of poputated areas and we need regulations to stop back yard breeding of all animals and the cities needs to put
restrictions on the amount of
dogs they can breed.
County officials told commissioners during a discussion
on dangerous dogs Tuesday that they would develop a package of increased
restrictions aimed at preventing attacks.
Also, most people would not want to take
on the burden of owning a
dog declared «
dangerous» with the liability and additional
restrictions.
The police chief will determine if they are vicious, a finding that could lead to
restrictions on their owners, including having to display a
dangerous dog sign
on their property.
In 2000, the government of Lower Saxony, Germany ruled certain breeds of
dogs especially
dangerous and placed
restrictions on their ownership.
Basically, these plaintiffs wanted the court to eliminate any
restrictions on their ownership of
dogs including animal cruelty laws, tethering
restrictions, management of
dangerous or potentially
dangerous dogs, and
restrictions for allowing nuisance behavior.
The
restriction is based
on the assumption that certain breeds of
dogs are inherently
dangerous or aggressive, and in response to a number of highly publicized
dog bites and attacks made by animals identified as pit bull - type
dogs.
Blanck and others also have voiced concerns that
dog adopters may run into trouble with home - insurance companies, or neighborhoods and apartments who have rules or
restrictions on certain breeds, often based
on size or
dangerous image.
In Oregon we helped pass a landmark
dangerous dog law and in Monroe County, Florida, we worked with residents and local government to replace an unenforceable $ 500 intact animal fee with a $ 35 fee, removed arbitrary
restrictions on animal limits, and made other changes that vastly increase chances for compliance and cultivate goodwill and cooperation between citizens, lawmakers and animal control officials.
Some
restrictions that various versions of BSL impose are: - muzzling and leashing in public - muzzling and leashing in cars - extra-short leash lengths - automatic
dangerous or vicious
dog designation, without any bite history - banning from city parks and beaches where other breeds are allowed - banning from leash - free parks where other breeds are allowed - banning completely from jurisdiction (although sometimes existing
dogs are allowed to stay)- special (i.e., more expensive) licensing and jurisdiction - wide registry - special tags identifying the
dog as a restricted
dog - mandatory microchipping and photograph - mandatory insurance (often one million dollars) for each individual
dog on the premises - mandatory signage indicating the presence of the
dog on the owner's property - mandatory secure enclosures (in some cases, mandatory chaining)- mandatory spay / neuter (to eventually eliminate the breed entirely)- higher fines and / or jail time if a restricted breed bites or menaces - fines and / or jail time for any infraction of any provision regarding restricted breeds - age limit for walking the
dog in public - persons with criminal records not allowed to own a restricted breed - ability of law enforcement to stop owners
on the street just to check the
dog's status - ability of law enforcement to seize
dogs without proof of wrongdoing - ability of law enforcement to enter an owner's home, with or without a warrant, to investigate and / or seize a
dog