This indicates that parallel adaptation to similar environments may lead to the same
result by natural selection, yet this evolution can proceed along different evolutionary genetic routes.
Not exact matches
So the real questions are: 1) how can there even be a universal understanding of «right» and «wrong» without a creator 2) how can purely random genetic mutations preserved
by natural selection have
resulted in the desire to do «right» even amongst those that do not believe in life after death?
This may happen, both
by virtue of damage done to the chromosomal structure and as a
result of keeping alive the offspring of human specimens with poor genetic endowment who otherwise would have,
by natural selection, died before reaching childbearing age.
your video (apparently done
by some high school kid) is self refuting, it's premise is that — mutations exist in a population, — drastic environmental change dramatically favors one set of mutations — this
natural selection is then what
results in «rapid change»
DNA coding is affected
by the environment via adaptation; DNA specific structure is unpredictable from biochemistry / physics alone but is environmentally determined over generations (via
natural selection)--
resulting in the white fur of the polar bear, for example.
Our
results show that male competition is a key driver of speciation —
by a factor that is five times greater than
results on which other, more - traditional theories of
natural selection causing speciation are based.»
If life today is the
result of evolution
by natural selection, Darwin realized, then even the most complex systems in biology must have emerged gradually from simple precursors, like someone crossing a river using stepping - stones.
Although this
natural gene drive is unpredictable and scattershot, Burt showed that certain tricks of molecular biology could achieve the same
results: causing a gene to be inherited
by many more organisms through many generations than standard genetics and
natural selection allow.
Our
results suggest that gene dosage is an adaptive trait that confers phenotypic plasticity among
natural Leishmania populations
by rapid down - or upregulation of transporter proteins to limit the effects of environmental stresses, such as drug
selection.
The antagonistic pleiotropic theory first proposed
by Williams in 1957 states that aging is the
result of the
natural selection of many genes with pleiotropic function that benefit the young but will have an adverse effect later in life.
In reality, hunter - gatherers were unbelievably skilled (a point also made
by Jared Diamond in his classic Guns, Germs and Steel, in which, if I recollect correctly, he makes a compelling case that as a
result of
natural selection and their environment, the indigenous people of Papua New Guinea are, on average, more intelligent than so called «first world *» inhabitants).
Island dwarfism is thought to
result from intense
natural selection caused
by evolutionary pressures of living on islands (e.g., increased competition for limited resources)[43].