The last time the Constitutional Convention was called was in 1965, and the last time an amendment was passed as
a result of the Constitutional Convention was in 1936.
Not exact matches
The Irish Government has still to respond on these later reports, but already it is clear that the
Convention recommendations on many matters will lead to the holding
of referendums on specific issues in 2015; and we are likely to see real and significant
constitutional change made as a
result.
Going through the more formal, restricted process
of proposing a specific Amendment that must be introduced in Congress, be passed by 2/3 majorities in both houses, and then be ratified by the required number
of states (3/4, which would still have to approve amendments from a
convention, as well) seems doomed to fail in this current period of hyper - partisanship and gridlock, but the alternative of calling a Constitutional Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had
convention, as well) seems doomed to fail in this current period
of hyper - partisanship and gridlock, but the alternative
of calling a
Constitutional Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had
Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected
results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had hoped for.
Given that the new body was to be elected using proportional representation (the
result of successful bargaining with Labour in the Scottish
Constitutional Convention), it was unlikely that any single party would ever win an overall majority.
Opponents
of a
constitutional convention, including several public employee unions, worry that instead
of gaining reforms, the wide - open nature
of the
convention could
result in the loss
of some rights that exist now in the state's constitution.
DeFrancisco told syracuse.com in an interview that a
constitutional convention next year would likely have the same
result as in 1967, when voters ultimately turned down the initiatives that came out
of the
convention as a single ballot proposition.
«After thoroughly reviewing the issue, the Association
of Justices
of the Supreme Court
of the State
of New York has determined that a state
Constitutional Convention is unnecessary, would be overly costly, and could result in the reversion, elimination or diminution of many current constitutional rights and safeguards,» said Justice Deborah Dowling, the grou
Constitutional Convention is unnecessary, would be overly costly, and could
result in the reversion, elimination or diminution
of many current
constitutional rights and safeguards,» said Justice Deborah Dowling, the grou
constitutional rights and safeguards,» said Justice Deborah Dowling, the group's president.
They discuss the
results of the elections, the future
of redistricting, hydrofracking, jobs and the economy, and the proposed
Constitutional Convention for 2017.
Former State Assembly Ways & Means Chair Arthur «Jerry» Kremer, in a new book analyzing the potential costs and benefits
of a
convention, writes that in 100 years, only six amendments have been made through the
convention and 200 have
resulted from individual
constitutional amendments.
Otherwise, the decision to implement cessation clause will
result in the violation
of a number
of fundamental rights, including the right to life, to equality, to human dignity and to freedom from ill - treatment and torture; all lies at the heart
of the 1951 Refugee
Convention, human rights law, and
constitutional frameworks.
Essentially, the national court asks whether Simmenthal II applies to the ECHR now that article 6 (3) TEU states that «Fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European
Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and as they
result from the
constitutional traditions common to the Member States, shall constitute general principles
of the Union's law».
The Union shall respect fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European
Convention for the Protection
of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms signed in Rome on 4 November 1950 and as they
result from the
constitutional traditions common to the Member States, as general principles
of Community law.