Sentences with phrase «result of the market crash»

As a result of the market crash and other factors, many plans are now underfunded by 15 % or more.

Not exact matches

Every major gaming joint in the Nevada city reported worse results in the third quarter of this year than in Q3 2008, when the stock market crashed.

The tangled nature of financial markets results in this paper only being able to make a strong, supported argument of mini flash crashes playing a contributory role.

«This line of reasoning provides us with the following important result: the market return from today to tomorrow is proportional to the crash hazard rate.

We all know what the end result was (a market crash of over 80 %), but we don't know the real reasons why.

Look at the beautiful chart below with its monthly MACD ripening and its RSI doing something that has only resulted in market crashes on the last 4 occurrences, including the crash of» 87.

The inflation scenario results in a financial impact of around two - thirds of the market crash scenario.

Well - known U.S. stock market crashes include the market crash of 1929, which resulted from economic decline and panic selling and sparked the Great Depression, and Black Monday (1987), which was also largely caused by mass panic.

Throughout history, severe market losses and crashes have nearly always been the result of an upward spike in previously compressed risk premiums.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

(Though it's been on the market for a couple of years, NHTSA does not have crash test results for the 500X.)

The recent Chinese stock market crash and resulting volatility of the world's markets had an impact on my portfolio's value, dropping it by about 8 %.

Stock market crashes always seem to result in a bad day for everyone, especially those with large holdings of shares.

Present market conditions now match 6 other instances in history: August 1929 (followed by the 85 % market decline of the Great Depression), November 1972 (followed by a market plunge in excess of 50 %), August 1987 (followed by a market crash in excess of 30 %), March 2000 (followed by a market plunge in excess of 50 %), May 2007 (followed by a market plunge in excess of 50 %), and January 2011 (followed by a market decline limited to just under 20 % as a result of central bank intervention).

The stock market crash of 1929 and resulting Great Depression put the kibosh on the mutual fund industry.

Some of the increase in dividend income over the last decade is a result of the growing popularity of dividend investing with retail investors and the need for consistent returns after tough market crashes have wiped out years worth of appreciation.

Given that this portfolio began at the end of the bull, then went through the crash and came out again, shouldn't this result be much higher given that the bulk of the investments must have happened while the market was on its way down, at rock bottom, and then back up again?

Nope, not at all, kicking the can down the road would be more accurate... Every government and central bank response to, and rescue of the market from, each bubble in the past dozen years has only delayed the resulting crash and / or simultaneously created the next (bigger) bubble.

I will say that one point which does have some validity is the fact that in a market crash you are withdrawing a percentage amount of the account balance as of the beginning of the year which doesn't seem fair except for the fact that in an «up» year, you are also withdrawing a percentage of the beginning of the year balance which results in a smaller percentage amount.

Your strategy, on its own, understates the risk of dividend default or suspension, tax changes that could impact dividend distributions, market crashes that result in dividend cancellations.

This results in Lending Club not having an impact yet, but a good sign of increased risk in the future.The markets may crash first, but if we enter an economic downturn this type of investment will also receive negative implications.

Look back at the longer - term VIX chart & you'll see the same post - recession / market crash pattern re-occurring historically (as a direct result of Fed / central bank action).

Well - known U.S. stock market crashes include the market crash of 1929, which resulted from economic decline and panic selling and sparked the Great Depression, and Black Monday (1987), which was also largely caused by mass panic.

The result of oversaturation and lack of quality control of games (leading to the 1983 videogame crash) left the door open for Nintendo and Japanese companies in general to capitalize on the home console market.

Not discussed in the article was the fact that there was worldwide competitive subsidization by governments (trying to achieve dominant market share) that resulted in a glut of panels that resulted in a crash in panel prices to well below manufacturers cost.

Thus far, the decline in real estate prices has been linked to everything from the Wall Street crash and tightening credit markets to lax lending practices by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the resulting low interest rates that contributed to artificial inflation of home prices.

The much bigger market — and that most likely to have either a) crashes resulting in horrific injuries (because they're inexperienced, and don't ride very smart); or b) lots of money to hire criminal defense lawyers (because they're RUBs)-- is the posers.

-- The most popular cryptocurrency in the world, bitcoin, experienced a slight fall, while Ripple fell by 11 percent as a result of analysts» comments about the upcoming crash of the cryptocurrency market.

As of press time, Litecoin has experienced a an 80 % rise the past 24 hours meanwhile Ethereum has seen a 30 % rise in its market capitalization hitting the $ 60 Billion mark on coin marketcap and this has resulted to a crash on the coinbase site.

Keeping in mind that China at the time accounted for such a huge part of global cryptocurrency trading and mining, the market naturally crashed as a result.

As the movie delves into the high stakes gambles investors were making on high - risk and generally opaque financial structures such as RMBS and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) it is fitting that the story line takes a bit of a side trip from Wall Street to Las Vegas, which ended up as one of the markets worst hit by the resulting crash.