Sentences with phrase «resulting consensus view»

Not exact matches

According to two officials, Trump's decision to launch a potential trade war was born out of anger at other simmering issues and the result of a broken internal process that has failed to deliver him consensus views that represent the best advice of his team.

The end result is that there is a legitimate disconnect between Apple's R&D trends and the consensus view of the company's product pipeline.

David Miller of Loop Capital stuck to his Buy rating on Walt Disney Co (NYSE: DIS) despite mixed first - quarter results, which saw earnings topping Street view while weakness in ESPN dragged down sales below consensus estimate.

Expectations are modest, with flattish results or even small declines the consensus view.

The result is an increase in short - term interest rates beyond what is currently reflected in market expectations and the consensus view, leaving our 2 - year forecast a bit higher at 1.75 %.

Therefore, curve flattener reflects the consensus bearish volatility view where asset prices continue to boom under policy accommodation, while curve steepener expresses a bullish volatility thesis where higher term premium (as a result of «quantitative tightening») would reverse policy - induced private capital displacement and «financial adventurism.»

A note from Pivotal Research senior analyst Brian Wieser said that Publicis» results were viewed favorably by investors given consensus estimates of 0.7 percent (but said Pivotal was expecting results of 2.8 percent).

The growing consensus is that reinforcement of positive behavior, proper review of disruptive or bullying behavior viewed in its context, and the proper training of the educator can have a much better result than zero tolerance policies have proven.

The result is an increase in short - term interest rates beyond what is currently reflected in market expectations and the consensus view, leaving our 2 - year forecast a bit higher at 1.75 %.

One has to wonder how many other papers with incorrect results have been published by scientists who go along with «consensus» views, and have never been corrected.

This latest report on the Science of Climate Change covered the key aspects of concern to those not part of the IPCC consensus, but did not involve them sufficiently, if at all, in developing the material and the result seems to be an official dismissal of the literature rather than a thorough development as is common for ideas necessary for the consensus view to be valid.

«evidence evaluation view» • Comparative evaluations of research results • Tools: Scientific consensus building; multi disciplinary expert panels • focus on robust findings

Dismissing natural variability even though it is well demonstrated by now that the consensus view on so - called «global warming» has failed seems to invert the scientific process of (in rough form): Observe > hypothesis > test / predict > measure result > Compare to observation > reconcile to reality.

Specifically, instead of accepting the consensus as the result of researchers independently converging on the same evidence - based view, it can be explained via the idea of a complex and secretive conspiracy among researchers.

Every day I read at WUWT links to articles, produced by the «climate science community,» that have results that could be interpreted (as Anthony does right or wrong) as undermining the «consensus» view on AGW.

The majority of expert climate scientists have reached the consensus view that human activity has resulted in global warming, although there is debate about how much the temperature will rise in the future.

The result: larger uncertainty than necessary, almost all of it in the direction opposite to the consensus view.

The main result of this study, that the influence of urban areas on the global land temperature data set is very small, corroborates the consensus view among climate scientists, including, for example, the recent paper by Souleymane Fall and others.