The resulting planetary energy imbalance, absorbed solar energy exceeding heat emitted to space, causes Earth to warm.
The resulting planetary energy imbalance, absorbed solar energy exceeding heat emitted to space, causes Earth to warm.
Not exact matches
The
resulting net
planetary energy imbalance for the six years 2005 — 2010 is +0.58 ± 0.15 W / m2.
Changing the
energy imbalance of the
planetary system by inhibiting the escape of radiant heat to space WILL
result in warming, no matter whether or not you can observe it accurately.
No support for the assertions @ 104 are provided by the SkS post which contrary-wise argues that a
planetary energy imbalance (and the
resulting ΔOHC) can occur when SAT remains flat on decadal timescales.
This has the potential to be world shattering, but it may take 10 or 15 years to be recognized However, those who are astute in their understanding of physics, especially the Second Law of Thermodynamics, could play a part in disseminating this information pertaining to the gravitationally induced temperature gradient that is found in all
planetary tropospheres and sub-surface regions and the
resulting energy flows..
This fixed infrastructure coupled with a pretty much insatiable human demand drive for
energy services may
result in a once - in - a-species crisis if our
planetary resource and ecosystems can no longer keep pace.
I have previously conceded the view that the temperature of a planet is a
result of the delay in solar
energy passing through the
planetary system however it is constituted for a particular planet and that is consistent with standard «greenhouse» theory.
The
resulting net
planetary energy imbalance for the six years 2005 — 2010 is +0.58 ± 0.15 W / m2.
The
resulting average
planetary energy imbalance, if it really exists, is only 1 part in 1,000.
The
planetary heat loss would drop if the emission temperature were to drop, and the planet would no longer be in
energy balance,
resulting in
energy accumulation.
I'm looking at the Humlum, Solheim, and Stordahl paper and it seems to me: (1) They are decomposing data by projecting onto these wavelet basis sets, (2) Looking for coincidences between
planetary resonances and regions of high
energy in the
resulting projections, (3) Concluding that when these regions include some resonances that these relationships must be causal.
We find that an increase in poleward heat transport by the tropical ocean
results in a warming of the extra-tropics, relatively little change in the tropical temperatures, moistening of the subtropical dry zones, and partial but incomplete compensation of the
planetary - scale
energy transport by the atmosphere.