The resulting punitive damage award may be substantial.
Not exact matches
Neither the World Photography Organisation, nor any other party involved in creating, producing, or delivering the Site, nor any naming right sponsors, event sponsors and third parties affiliated with the World Photography
Awards and the World Photography Organisation («Event Partners») shall be liable for any direct, incidental, consequential, indirect, or
punitive damages arising out of Your access to, or use of, or browsing the Site, or downloading of any materials, data, text images, video, or audio from the Site, including, without limitation,
damage to, or viruses that may infect, Your computer equipment or other property as a
result thereof.
The
results of this deposition will often significantly influence not only the outcome of the case, but the size of the recovery, and the
award of
punitive damages.
'' (g) The total deterrent effect of other punishment imposed upon the defendant as a
result of the misconduct, including, but not limited to,
punitive damage awards to
In its Cain opinion, the Court discusses the fact that
punitive damages awarded in the Expedious Management Company case were common law
punitive damages while the
damages awarded in the instant case were the
result of a statute.
Punitive damages are a tool that, although intended to be used as a deterrent, can
result in sizeable
awards depending on an individual judge's / jury's understanding of the facts.
As a
result,
punitive damages may not be
awarded in every case.
Punitive damages are most often
awarded after a fatal accident or an accident that
results in a catastrophic injury that will have a long term significant impact on your life.
Section 411.130 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes allows
punitive damages to be
awarded in wrongful death cases if the act that
resulted in the death was either willful or the
result of gross negligence.
However, those claims that do succeed have
resulted in noticeably larger
punitive damage awards in recent years.
An older decision that
resulted in a significant
punitive damage award is the 1996 decision Mustaji v. Tjin12.
The plaintiff alleged in the statement of claim that the Bank displayed the same tactics and approach in his dismissal as in earlier dismissal, which had
resulted in court
awards of
punitive damages against the bank.
In Ontario misconduct during the course of litigation can also
result in an
award of
punitive damages.
Few personal injury cases
result in
punitive damage awards, and there may need to be a compensatory
award before the court or jury can consider a
punitive damage award.
The case
resulted in an
award of $ 924,000 in unpaid compensation to Ms. Jafa - Bodden, and additional
punitive damages of nearly $ 6.5 million.
Terhune v. Forum Group Corp et al.: Loretta Terhune was
awarded $ 8.5 million in actual
damages and $ 35 million in
punitive damages as a
result of the poor care her father received during the eight months he was a resident at Moran Lake Road Nursing Home in Rome, Ga..
The
result of a seven - day jury trial was a wrongful death jury
award of $ 16,520,000 for loss of life, pain and suffering, funeral expenses, and
punitive damages.
The jury had decided the case in favor of plaintiff, who alleged negligence, negligence per se and intentional infliction of emotional distress, concluding also that defendant nursing home had acted with reckless disregard for the rights of others,
resulting in a $ 10,000
punitive damage award tacked onto the $ 1.2 million in compensatory
damages.
A Fresno Superior Court jury
awarded $ 68 million (including $ 12.39 million in
punitive damages) to the family of Silvino Perez, ruling that Dr. Pervaiz Chaudhry was responsible for putting Mr. Perez into a coma as a
result of his negligence during surgery.
Simplifying a bit here, the plaintiff went on to argue that Massachusetts law permits
punitive damages for intentional acts and, since discrimination is the
result of intentional acts, any finding of discrimination is sufficient to support an
award of
punitive damages.
In a case where compensatory
damages to the plaintiff are relatively low, such a
result might be viewed as constitutionally suspect because of the supposed «disparity» between the «actual or poten - tial harm suffered by the plaintiff and the
punitive damages award.»
One response to this problem is to note that those situations simply won't occur too often, and if they do, these
results should not be viewed as controversial compared to the various cases in which courts have upheld
punitive damages awards that constitute a far higher percentage of net wealth or value than what I've suggested under retributive dam - ages.
Ms. Birnbaum represented FMC Corporation in an appeal in New York that
resulted in a reversal and new trial of a $ 5 million
punitive damage award arising out of a construction accident.
The parties were unable to produce any Canadian case law in which
punitive damages were
awarded as a
result of injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident caused by an impaired driver nor were they able to produce any appellate authority that prohibited such
damages in this context.
As a
result of this reversal, the court concluded that the
punitive damages award could no longer stand.