He mentions James Montier's chart on actual Gross Domestic Product
results against the consensus forecasts.
... comments like those of James Wang of Environmental Defense, who says that scientists who publish
results against the consensus are «mostly in the pocket of oil companies»; and those of the, yes, United Kingdom's Royal Society that say that there «are some individuals and organisations, some of which are funded by the US oil industry, that seek to undermine the science of climate change and the work of the IPCC»
Not exact matches
The usual assertions are (1) that this kind of religion is today on the defensive; (2) that the defensive posture is occasioned by the flourishing of «conservative churches» (although the alleged liberal enervation is also seen in more autonomous terms); (3) that the growth in religious conservatism and conservative churches is itself the
result of widespread reaction
against «secular humanist» values and
against those who hold such values; (4) that our society as a whole has been experiencing a breakdown in moral
consensus, a loss of moral coherence somehow connected with a decline in oldline Protestant dominance; and (5) that some or all of these happenings have been quite sudden, so that the early 1960s can be taken as a kind of benchmark — as a time before the fall.
The
consensus reads, «Avengers: Infinity War ably juggles a dizzying array of MCU heroes in the fight
against their gravest threat yet, and the
result is a thrilling, emotionally resonant blockbuster that (mostly) realizes its gargantuan ambitions.»
On the other hand, a
result that goes
against the grain of the
consensus is, by definition, a novel
result and is more likely to be explicitly reported.