Sentences with phrase «results mean nothing»

The ATTS results mean nothing.

Before my screaming mom voice drowned out the rest of our conversation, Kosofsky read my mind and was quick to point out that the results mean nothing for women.

Pre-season results mean nothing in the long term, just ask multi Emirates Cup winning manager Arsene Wenger.

As long as we keep our good form of winning our remaining matches, their results mean nothing to us.

One of two reasonable results mean nothing in a season that is over anyway..

Result means nothing, next week is the real games.

Yes indeed it was an unnecessary replay to begin with, this 4 - 0 result means nothing we beat a championship side it wasn't Barcelona!

Stuckey says: These two teams played in Week 1 (Viking 29, Saints 19), but that result means nothing.

The referendum result means nothing from the perspective of the EU law — only the letter activating Article 50 would.

The fact that a great deal of the melt in Arctic sea ice is affected by the accumulating heat in the oceans and the fact that energy is advected to the Arctic via the oceans in much larger amounts than via the atmosphere and the extreme loss we've seen in Arctic sea ice volume as a result means nothing to the «skeptics».

You wrote - «The fact that a great deal of the melt in Arctic sea ice is affected by the accumulating heat in the oceans and the fact that energy is advected to the Arctic via the oceans in much larger amounts than via the atmosphere and the extreme loss we've seen in Arctic sea ice volume as a result means nothing to the «skeptics».»

Not exact matches

Nothing but confusion results if we simply apply the common meanings of these two terms when we use them in the context of his metaphysic.

Therefore, the meaning of our Lord's answer is that this man's blindness was not the result of an immoral act on the part of his parents, and certainly he did nothing before birth to deserve this affliction.

Maitland Niles is a CM who can also play on the wings.Wenger using him in that position is just making him poor.The guy's confidence will really go down.I mean why not just use him in CM?After all it's only preseason.I just don't get Wenger at times.I would have also started Coquelin in this match who looks to be really impressive.This result determines nothing in our season as many preseason matches have taught us.

Stats do mean nothing when the score result is miserable.

negatives -LRB--)-- terrible result — wengers team selection (arteta + ozil in particular)-- generally poor work - rate across the pitch and nothing like the backbone we showed against man city — handing dortmund initiative to top the group (we all know what finishing 2nd means)-- lack of hunger + desire — welbeck misses — still no joel campbell (who in my personal opinion is a big game / stage player)-- in all our «set - piece» training we totally forgot about the bread and butter of football which is making an impact in open play

If their only consideration is money it means they've learnt nothing from last season and the result will be inevitable..

When they don't — meaning, when the staff doesn't pat them on the back for their decision and assure them that resulting trainwreck had nothing to do with being at home, they take it as the staff being «unsupportive.»

From the viewpoint of the EU law, the result of the U.K. referendum means absolutely nothing.

Much has been written in the past week about what the results mean for each of the parties, with a good deal of advice about what David Cameron should do - ranging from tacking right to tacking left to doing nothing at all.

The Results Are In Although one person trying multiple methods simultaneously means nothing scientifically, I did have my IQ tested before and after.

Despite being trumpeted in certain circles as meaning that there's really nothing to worry about regarding the Greenland ice sheet, the authors made a point of noting (although not in this press release) that an additional source of mass loss needs to be identified in order to reconcile their results with the GRACE data (which do not show a reduction in mass loss for the same period).

Every word I've written and every studied I've linked ultimately mean nothing if you can't use this article to get results.

In my opinion if what your doing is achieving the results you are after, then all the science and research in the world saying you are wrong means absolutely nothing.

Amazon can learn nothing solely from the data request sent to it, because it has no idea what your request is meant for, or how the results will be used.

I mean, I already saw a lot of indicators and until now, nothing with a good results.

Just because the FTC TSR didn't mention tax resolution, tax negotiation, or tax relief doesn't mean that its ok Mislead or Confused a consumer into thinking they will get a specific results and later to find out nothing has been done and most of the fees is already collected upfront.

Just because the FTC TSR didnâ $ ™ t mention tax resolution, tax negotiation, or tax relief doesnâ $ ™ t mean that its ok Mislead or Confused a consumer into thinking they will get a specific results and later to find out nothing has been done and most of the fees is already collected upfront.

* Training / Behavior Modification hasn't resulted in an acceptable change in the dog; * There is significant risk and / or evidence that dog is going to seriously injure someone; aggression problems don't automatically mean the dog will injure someone or is dangerous; I am referring to the idea that even with reasonable precautions, supervision, training and behavior modification, the dog is still going to get around all of that and hurt someone; * You have made a reasonable effort to work with the dog and situation; meaning you have PAID a professional to help you, worked the situation properly and diligently, and you still can't trust the dog to not hurt itself, another animal or a person; * The dog is so dangerous you can't place the dog with someone else; * The owner isn't willing, or is unable, or unqualified, to work with the dog any further, even with supervised professional help; some people won't follow instructions, so some of these dogs would be fine in the hands of someone else, but not the current owner; * Regardless what you do (behavior modification, training, and / or behavioral medications) nothing has made the dog manageable, and your trainer is recommending you consider euthanasia; * Even behavioral medications can't alleviate the problem; I am experienced working with drugs prescribed by veterinarians and can give you feedback as to how things are going, or when you might wish to consider another drug; * This dog is too dangerous to work with.

Standards also vary by breed, so comparing passing percentages of breeds means nothing, if the same behavior from two separate breeds can result in one passing and one failing.

Another example is how they have fragile bones, meaning that they have a very difficult time surviving incidents that would result in injuries but nothing more for bigger, healthier dogs.

but that would just give me an irrelevant number as the end result as it means absolutely nothing.

It only takes a minute and the result meant the different between hitting most everything and nothing.

I mean, put auction results aside and whatever it is that the art world thinks defines a big young artist in 2016, because it's nothing compared to Ryan.

It gets confusing, because some of the great pictorial inventors of the twentieth century, like Andy Warhol, obviously, appeared to be doing nothing more than choosing — but that was an illusion, something borrowed from the beauty industry, where the amount of time spent in the makeup chair is meant to result in an effortlessly natural look.

In a system with multiple properties, causes and effects, averaging certainly can be done but the calculated result may not only not mean what you think it means, it may mean nothing at all in describing reality.

Being a genuine sceptic, and there's is nothing wrong with that, doesn't just mean accepting the results you like and rejecting rest.

Therefore it's very difficult, if not impossible, to tell, why the result differs from those of others, but the lack of those details means only that we have nothing else to support the result than the word of the author.

To anyone who actually cares about evidence, data or reality, it means these guys use a flawed methodology which biases the results and do nothing to correct for that.

DeWitt, I know nothing of OCTAVE, but Jan Pompe used to easily convert my matlab scripts for use with OCTAVE... it should not be that difficult... Here are my HARTCODE results (U means usst - 76 atmosphere), the tau vector, and the plot command:

Despite being trumpeted in certain circles as meaning that there's really nothing to worry about regarding the Greenland ice sheet, the authors made a point of noting (although not in this press release) that an additional source of mass loss needs to be identified in order to reconcile their results with the GRACE data (which do not show a reduction in mass loss for the same period).

Its a burden that the modelers have to bear or their results will always mean little to nothing.

It is possible to execute a post-nup, but in that case, if it was truly voluntary, the wife probably wouldn't sign it because it would mean that she would be giving up rights that she had already acquired as a result of the marriage for nothing in return, and if it was involuntary, then it wouldn't be valid.

Nothing about moving trucks is or random houses that simply «look abandoned» has any meaning here, further than the truck - moving thing actually tended to show that the homeowner took deliberate steps to falsely portray a situation in order to take his intended action against those who he expected to act as a result of that false portrayal.

We handle all motorcycle accident cases on a contingency basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we get results.

Failing to meet other time limits or deadlines could also result in your ICBC injury claim being dismissed, meaning that you get nothing whatsoever for your injuries.

The photography of JK Rowling's son without his parents» consent raises a real question as to the nature of the expectation of privacy, where the resulting photo showed nothing demeaning and was not obtained by means of harassment.

You're thankful nothing bad happened as a result of your carelessness, but you can't help but wonder what this will mean for your car insurance rates.

Whilst there's nothing wrong with being ambitious, I can recognise that this kind of thinking can result in you placing too much pressure on yourself, meaning you don't always celebrate or give yourself credit for your most recent achievement.

Anyone can claim that they have skills in marketing, technology, finance, sales, etc., but unless you PROVE those skills through measurable results, those skills mean nothing to the reader.