Sentences with phrase «results of a frontal crash»

The Overall Vehicle Score combines the results of a frontal crash test, side crash tests and rollover resistance tests and compares those results to the average risk of injury and potential for vehicle rollover of other vehicles to give vehicles an indexed single score that consumers can use for comparison when vehicle shopping.

Not exact matches

A new frontal oblique test to address a crash type that continues to result in deaths and serious injuries despite the use of seat belts, air bags, and the crashworthy structures of late - model vehicles;
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluation is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.
As a convenience to new car shoppers, the Overall Vehicle Score represents the combined results of the overall ratings from the frontal crash tests, the side crash tests2 and the rollover - resistance3 into a single, summary score between one and five stars.
«These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the Institute's frontal crash test program in bringing about improvements in vehicle designs,» says Adrian Lund, the Institute's chief operating officer.
The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based primarily on results of the frontal offset crash test at 40 mph.
The frontal crashworthiness rating is based on results of a 40 mph frontal offset crash test.
Concern: In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the passenger's frontal air bag, excessive internal pressure could cause rupturing of the inflator resulting in metal fragments striking and potentially seriously injuring the passenger seat occupant or other occupants.
Studies of frontal crashes have shown similar results: Drivers of vehicles with good ratings in the Institute's frontal offset crash test are much less likely to die in frontal crashes.
Concern: In the event of a motor vehicle crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
In a release issued yesterday the institute said results from 2009 testing showed that small overlap crashes accounted for nearly a quarter of the frontal crashes involving serious or fatal injury to front seat occupants in vehicles that otherwise had good rating for frontal crash protection.
About the only negative press we've seen on the car was marginal crash test results by the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety in its small overlap frontal crash testing.
[36] U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results in 2004 rated the RX 330 the maximum five stars in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, Side Driver, and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four of five stars in the Rollover category.
The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test results has given the RX 350 the maximum five star rating in the Frontal Driver, Frontal Passenger, Side Driver, and Side Rear Passenger categories, and four of five stars in the Rollover category at a risk of 16.4 %.
IIHS testing reveals that in crashes of this type the impact occurs toward the car's outer edge; the vehicle has a tendency to rotate during the collision, resulting in the driver's head moving outboard, away from the frontal airbag.
Frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at Frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.
As a result of all these measures, the new Cayenne models comply with all legal requirements for all types of crash protection, including frontal, side, diagonal and rear impact, as well as rollover damage and frontal - or sidepost impact.
The Euro NCAP crash test result for Hyundai Kona states that the passenger compartment of the Kona remained stable in the frontal offset test.
Details: An electrical short could occur in the steering wheel wiring harness, which could result in an inadvertent unwarranted deployment of the driver frontal airbag, which could lead to minor injuries or a crash if the driver loses control of the vehicle because of the surprise deployment.
The researchers compared injury data reported from real crashes with results of both the Institute's frontal offset crash tests and the federal government's full - front tests.
The Institute's crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.
Concern: In the event of a crash necessitating deployment of the driver's frontal air bag, the inflator could rupture with metal fragments striking the driver or other occupants resulting in serious injury or death.
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests.
The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of frontal offset crash tests at 40 mph.
As well as «excessive footwell deformation» occurring in frontal offset crash testing, which can results in lower leg injuries, ANCAP noted that elements of the dashboard were «a potential injury source for both the driver and passenger».
According to a study by the IIHS, small overlap crashes of this type accounted for nearly 25 - percent of frontal crashes resulting in a serious injury or fatality.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z