It said the programme was unlikely to get better
results than previous Government schemes.
Not exact matches
The
result was the opposite: the isolated interference brought about a condition which — from the point of view of the
government — is even more undesirable
than the
previous state of affairs which the
government wanted to alter.
To this I'd submit the way the
government calculates CPI has changed many times since the 1970's... every time it
resulted in the CPI being stated lower
than before using the
previous method of calculation.