Employers have to be especially careful when making adverse employment decisions, such as firing or demoting, because such decisions could open the door for potential
retaliation claims against the employer if the subject employee is a member of a «protected class.»
Patrick joined Premier Law Group as a partner in 2004 and has since helped numerous individuals in their discrimination and / or
retaliation claims against their employers as well as claims of non-payment of wages.
Not exact matches
If an
employer suddenly terminates an employee because he asserts his civil rights, the employee might have a
claim of
retaliation against his
employer, based on the timing of the
employer's actions.
As experienced Hartford
retaliation attorneys, we are familiar with the laws governing employment
retaliation, and can help you file a
claim against your
employer.
The two litigators defend
employers against a variety of discrimination,
retaliation, harassment, and wage and hour
claims.
Shannon has more than 20 years of experience and has successfully defended
employers before federal and state courts and agencies
against claims including discrimination, harassment,
retaliation, wrongful termination, breach of contract, violations of wage and hour laws, and violations of leave laws.
If you were fired as
retaliation for filing a workers compensation
claim, you may be able to file suit
against the
employer (Section 65.2 - 308 of the Code of Virginia).
Adriana is a seasoned litigator, and defends
employers against claims brought
against them for wrongful discharge, discrimination, sexual harassment,
retaliation, and wage and hour disputes.
Her practice includes defending
employers against claims of discrimination, harassment,
retaliation, wrongful termination, and wage and hour disputes.
Melissa regularly defends
employers against claims of discrimination,
retaliation, harassment, and breach of contract...
Holding that a new statute covered cases filed before it was enacted, the Court of Appeal held that Labor Code section 98.7 does not require an employee to exhaust that statute's administrative remedies before filing suit on a
claim for
retaliation against a private
employer.
olding that a new statute covered cases filed before it was enacted, the Court of Appeal held that Labor Code section 98.7 does not require an employee to exhaust that statute's administrative remedies before filing suit on a
claim for
retaliation against a private
employer.
Represented scores of individuals in lawsuits
against their former
employers regarding
claims of discrimination, harassment, and
retaliation based on disability, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, race, and other protected classes and activities in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), California Family Rights Act (CFRA), Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), American Disabilities Act (ADA), and public policy.
Her practice focuses on defending
employers in federal and state courts and before administrative agencies
against claims of wage and hour violations, discrimination, harassment,
retaliation, and wrongful termination.