We need to determine how that general allocation strategy affects incentives for lawyers to bring
retributive damages actions.
Though the state ought to receive the bulk of the retributive damages (for reasons I explain in the next Section), it needs to provide incentive for plaintiffs and their lawyers to bring
retributive damages actions to the attention of the state.
If the government brought and won
a retributive damages action, a portion would go to the PAG as a reward for bringing this misconduct to public attention, much like many jurisdictions reward those who call in crime - stopping tips.
Not exact matches
Although such coordination efforts can happen through the promise of compensa - tory
damages alone or in a class
action, there are two reasons to think
retributive damages as I've described them are be an important supplemental tactic to achieve adequate detec - tion and punishment of private or complex misconduct.
Section C summarizes these benefits and articulates the comparative advantages of
retributive damages vis - à - vis compensatory
damages, class
actions, criminal sanctions, and extra-compensatory
damages awarded for victim - vindication or cost - internalization.
Plaintiffs who were harmed by a defendant's violation of the
retributive damages statute could seek
retributive damages as a remedy in a traditional tort
action.
Drawing upon some of the materials embedded in the social justice accounts of tort law, [16] Part IV clarifies why creating an intermediate
retributive sanction under the right safeguards to the tort system is a superior way of punishing and preventing misconduct than strictly relying on compensatory
damages, class
actions for compensatory
damages, extra-compensatory
damages for victim - vindication, the criminal justice system as we know it, or even a privately enforced criminal justice system.
That holding is only true for the
retributive (and arguably the complete, not optimal, deterrence) part of extra-compensatory
damages; by their nature, augmented
damages for the sake of cost - internalization involve only matters of empirical estimation (ie, what's the likelihood the defendant would escape having to compensate this plaintiff), and thus are no different than compensatory
damages (which ask, among other things, what kind of pain and suffering did the defendant's
action cause?)
Unlike the current regime, the
retributive damages structure would permit a de-fendant to credit any
retributive damages paid against any fines imposed in subsequent criminal
actions brought by the state for the same misconduct.