And while CCS could theoretically be used to
retrofit coal power plants, the study shows that hundreds of power plants would need retrofitting in a short period of time — a lot of pressure on a technology that as yet remains both technically and politically uncertain.
The project would have
retrofitted a coal power plant with new technology that sequestered 1.1 million metric tons of carbon pollution underground each year.
Not exact matches
Instead of building a new zero - emission
coal - fired
power plant in Illinois, the Obama administration will
retrofit an old
plant instead
Yohe estimates the cost of achieving a more modest goal of holding warming to roughly 2 degrees C at a cost of 0.5 to 1.5 percent of gross domestic product for the U.S. by 2050, thanks to the expense incurred by, for example, replacing existing
coal - fired
power plants with renewables or
retrofitting them with carbon - capture technology.
If the price on carbon is high enough to penalize
coal consumption, the theory is it creates economic incentives to
retrofit coal plants or use gas or wind
power to generate electricity.
In this future scenario with a high need for CDR, if the PUC had built the
coal + CCS project, it could choose to
retrofit the
plant to a biomass + CCS
power plant capable of removing carbon from the atmosphere at a relatively small incremental cost.
Even though the PUC might never exercise the option to
retrofit its
coal + CCS
power plant to a bio-CCS one capable of CDR, the option to do so has value today.
The federal law calls for the states to require energy companies to install «best available
retrofit technology» on old
coal - fired
power plants because their sulfur and nitrogen oxides are leading contributors to the haze that obscures vistas from the Grand Canyon to the Great Smoky Mountains.
The potential for carbon capture and storage in China One - third of
coal - fired
power plants in China meet a broad range of criteria for CCS
retrofit, representing a significant opportunity for meeting climate goals and setting a challenge for government and industry 17 January 2017
The only other American project to receive funding is another Tenaska effort, a plan still in its early stages to
retrofit with carbon capture technology a
coal - fired
power plant in Louisiana.
Similarly, emission reductions in the UK
power sector were largely driven by the retirement of old, inefficient
coal plant during the 1990s, through sulphur regulations which meant
plant owners were faced with the choice of either
retrofitting stock or retiring it (Eyre, 2001).
Coal and lignite
power plants that were earlier expected to be retired under today's conditions have simultaneously been
retrofitted for more flexible operation, extending their competitive service life.
The review also notes that
coal combustion remains the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions and local air pollution in the Czech Republic and highlighted the benefits of
retrofitting existing
coal - fired
power plants with cost - effective emissions controls, and replacement of ageing
plants with high - efficiency technology.
Since
coal - fired
power plants have a fairly long lifetime, and in order to meet climate constraints, there is a need either to apply CCS
retrofit to some of today's installed
coal - fired
power plants once the technology becomes available.
NRG has partnered with JX Nippon and the US Department of Energy to fund their «Petra Nova» project: a
retrofit of NRG's «WA Parish»
coal - fired
power plant outside of Houston, Texas with a post-combustion CO2 capture and storage (CCS) system.
Investing heavily in
retrofitting old
coal - fired
power plants or in building new ones makes no economic sense.
In addition to being used to simply produce cyclic carbonates, North believes it could also be
retrofitted on
coal - fired
plants: «If our catalyst could be employed at the source of high - concentration CO2 production, for example in the exhaust stream of a fossil - fuel
power station, we could take out the carbon dioxide, turn it into a commercially - valuable product and at the same time eliminate the need to store waste CO2.»