Sentences with phrase «return as the risk»

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
In his current role as President and Chief Strategist of Optimize Advisors, Mike uses pioneering and proprietary artificial intelligence technology to advise hedge funds, banks, pensions, mutual funds, insurance companies, and family offices in the effective use of listed options for enhancing returns and managing risk.
He then returned to the NAB as the Global General Manager of Operational Risk and Compliance for the Group.
CPPIB says farmland is an «attractive asset class» for the board because it delivers historically «stable, risk - adjusted returns» as demand for agricultural products continue to grow.
Constituent companies are chosen based on their score on two sets of measures: a quantitative assessment consisting of their return on equity, balance sheet accruals ratio and financial leverage ratio; and a qualitative score derived from management's responses to a survey about such topics as corporate governance, risk and crisis management, customer relationships and tax strategies.
Finally, the fourth conundrum is that as companies grow larger and management falls prey to the fallacy that it only exists to maximize shareholder short - term return on investment, companies become risk averse.
«There is an immediate expectation that as interest rates go up, investors can find greater return on capital by investing it in lower - risk portfolios.»
While the company failed to return a request for comment, in its S - 1 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, it recently cited Brexit as a major risk factor.
The terms alpha and beta are both associated with the risk ratios that investors use as a tool to calculate, compare and predict returns.
While Bond King Bill Gross, founder of world's largest bond fund PIMCO, is going deep into California and New York munis, claiming the returns are still the best in the market despite the headline risk, even the discussion of bankruptcy as a bargaining chip has caused some to fear bond market hysteria.
As risk - averse as investors have become since the recession, a lot of people remain fixated on returnAs risk - averse as investors have become since the recession, a lot of people remain fixated on returnas investors have become since the recession, a lot of people remain fixated on returns.
Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.
Asked about risks of being heavily involved in Tesla's aggressive production plans, Ito said Panasonic «hopes to play a balancing act» of ensuring investment returns and filling responsibilities as a supplier.
Even as derivatives trading may demonstrate a certain sophistication among millennial traders, it could also reflect their outsized stomach for risk, since they have a longer runway to earn returns from the market.
While it's better to invest than keep money under a mattress, buying risk free securities, such as guaranteed income certificates or low - yielding government bonds, could actually be riskier than purchasing higher returning products, says Ted Rechtshaffen, president and CEO of Toronto's TriDelta Financial Partners.
«The idea is that as institutional investors seek out increasingly higher levels of risk / return, that Bitcoin may represent the most risky / potentially highest return available, and hence could be evolving quickly into a primary barometer / leading indicator for broader financial markets and risk appetite.»
As a result, pension funds have had to go out on the risk curve, taking more risk to glean more return by investing, in part, in assets that are not as liquid as stocks or bondAs a result, pension funds have had to go out on the risk curve, taking more risk to glean more return by investing, in part, in assets that are not as liquid as stocks or bondas liquid as stocks or bondas stocks or bonds.
WASHINGTON, Nov 13 - Congressional Republicans pushed ahead on Monday on a U.S. tax code overhaul as a Senate panel considered the issue, but risks lay ahead with major intraparty disputes unsettled and President Donald Trump returning soon from Asia as the debate heats up.
He returns to her mother - in - law when he loses the money, seeing her wealth as a type of reserve fund and not appreciating the true risk of his financial decisions.
As financial advisors, it's our job to make sure our clients understand the type of returns to expect, depending on the level of risk they accept when they invest.
Alternative financing procurement — better known outside of Ontario as public - private partnerships — allow the public sector to pass on risks of delays and cost overruns to the private sector, in return for a small premium.
As a result, it is now clear that the U.S. is in the latter stages of the multi-year credit cycle, a period when rising corporate leverage negatively affects returns to corporate debt as investors demand higher risk premiums to compensate for the greater volatility created by increased leveragAs a result, it is now clear that the U.S. is in the latter stages of the multi-year credit cycle, a period when rising corporate leverage negatively affects returns to corporate debt as investors demand higher risk premiums to compensate for the greater volatility created by increased leveragas investors demand higher risk premiums to compensate for the greater volatility created by increased leverage.
Ideally, for any given time period, you want your investment to appear in the upper - left quadrant, as this indicates you've received higher returns for a relatively low amount of risk.
Martin: As an active portfolio manager, most of your day job involves trying to achieve superior risk - adjusted returns for clients.
Yet risks could return in the second half as U.S. rates increase and China's credit - fueled growth improvement slows.
As always, more return leads to more risk but by spreading out your portfolio over a number of different assets you can continue to decrease your risk of holding only one type of investment.
They also allow those investors to avoid the high costs of stock - brokerage commissions and financial planning fees that eat into returns, as well as the risks of investing in individual companies that may choose less - competent leaders or run into unforeseen problems.
By taking on more risk as an equity investor, one can economically participate in a company's value creation activities providing an enhanced return profile relative to a company's debt offerings.
As an active investor, I am seeking the highest after - tax return on my capital with low risk to permanent loss of capital.
As far as excess reserves are concerned, B&K argued back in 2016 (when the IOER was a mere 0.25 %), «the only potential loans that would have been affected by the Fed's payment of interest are those with risk - adjusted short - term returns between precisely zero and one - quarter percent — surely a tiny fraction of the total.&raquAs far as excess reserves are concerned, B&K argued back in 2016 (when the IOER was a mere 0.25 %), «the only potential loans that would have been affected by the Fed's payment of interest are those with risk - adjusted short - term returns between precisely zero and one - quarter percent — surely a tiny fraction of the total.&raquas excess reserves are concerned, B&K argued back in 2016 (when the IOER was a mere 0.25 %), «the only potential loans that would have been affected by the Fed's payment of interest are those with risk - adjusted short - term returns between precisely zero and one - quarter percent — surely a tiny fraction of the total.»
It represents the difference between a fund's actual returns and its expected performance, given its level of risk as measured by beta (see definition of Beta).
As confirmed in the next chart, our model correctly identified equity risk as being the likely primary driver of returns for both 2015 and 201As confirmed in the next chart, our model correctly identified equity risk as being the likely primary driver of returns for both 2015 and 201as being the likely primary driver of returns for both 2015 and 2016.
Higher proportion of funds focused in higher risk assets, such as shares for the potential of higher returns
If I can achieve a 8 % annual return with relatively low risk, I am allocating as much capital as possible to such an investment given our low interest rate environment.
While there is no such thing as «the right amount» when it comes to cash or any other asset class, investors need to consider both their return objectives and risk tolerance when making allocation decisions that are right for them.
Far from being perma - bearish, our present methods of classifying market return / risk profiles encourage a leveraged long position about 52 % of the time in market cycles across history, encouraging a partially - hedged stance about 12 % of the time, fully - hedged about 31 % of the time, and hard - defensive as we are today about 5 % of the time.
Reasonableness would be determined by looking at contributions to the business, as well as risks assumed and previous returns and remuneration paid to the individual.
Finally, while there is certainly a risk that bonds deliver lousy returns going forward, I view the chances of significant nominal drawdowns as pretty far down the list of concerns, regardless of what the Fed does.
As always, the strongest prospective market return / risk profile is associated with a material retreat in valuations followed by an early improvement in broad measures of market internals.
The most severe return / risk profiles we identify have sometimes persisted for several months without a material market correction... The perception of a Goldilocks economy may drag that out for a bit longer here, so again, we can't be impatient, and we'll take our evidence as it arrives.
The capitalization factor is a reflection of what rate of return a reasonable purchaser would expect on the investment, as well as a measure of the risk that the expected earnings will not be achieved.
«If we look historically at periods when conditions fell into the most negative return / risk profile we identify (as they are at present), we find that top formations often involve extended runs of severely negative conditions.
[For mathematically inclined clients, a simplistic, but useful way to see this is to examine the dividend discount model: Price = Dividend / (k - g) where g is the long - term growth rate of dividends and k is the long - term return required by investors, written as the sum of the risk free rate and a risk premium (k = Rf + z).
I would define long - term risk as failing to achieve the returns you're counting on for a comfortable retirement.
In fact, despite the added risks and work they entail, many see alternative investments as the perfect antidote to the anemic returns forecast for the broad - based equity and bond markets.
I think high costs [eroding already lower returns] are as much of a risk for investors as the [economic situation] in Europe or China.
We enhance the potential for incremental return as well as risk management by accessing select externally managed solutions to build prudently diversified portfolios.
Bottom Line: I think this is a good time for investors to return to tried - and - true risk management techniques, like diversification (including into foreign markets) and active portfolio management, as opposed to indexing.
Many traditional return to risk measures are not apt for intuitive interpretation The Keller ratio is expressed as an adjusted return and therefore easy to interpret The Keller ratio allows for strategy selection optimally aligned with an investor's risk appetite In our VAA - paper we introduced a
The annualized percentage difference between a fund's actual returns and its expected performance given its level of market risk, as measured by beta.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z