Sentences with phrase «return cash to shareholders if»

Covestro has announced that it will return cash to shareholders if it can't find a suitable takeover target within two years.

Not exact matches

Today, Apple got credit for its bountiful buyback plans, but there are tons of other companies returning huge slugs of cash to their shareholders and I think you'll miss out if you ignore them,» the «Mad Money» host concluded.

If you want companies to return less money to shareholders, then you should be able to defend an alternative choice for what they should do instead with their cash.

If shareholders start demanding that more drillers use their cash to grow returns instead of production, it could be just the thing the industry needs to prevent drilling itself into another hole by causing OPEC to fight back again.

In the long run companies must create enough cash flow to pay expenses, invest in the future (capital expenditures), service their debt (if any), and return money to shareholders.

If these companies have capital to allocate, and can't reinvest it attractively in the business, make sensible acquisitions with it or pay down debt, they have to either keep it around as cash equivalents or return it to shareholders.

If used correctly, there are a tax - efficient way to return cash to shareholders: a virtual dividend without the double taxation aspects that go along with a cash dividend.

Tax policy can also influence how companies choose to return cash to shareholders — if dividends are taxed at a higher rate than capital gains, this creates incentives to return cash via buybacks and debt reduction.

A good Score (i.e., value of 1) is assigned if the current ratio exceeds two, or net current assets exceed long - term debt, or 10 - year history of positive earnings, or 10 - year history of returning cash to shareholders or EPS are at least a third higher than they were 10 years ago.

If you think that this cash will most likely be returned to shareholders you have a great deal, if you think the company will find a new way to light money on fire it's not attractivIf you think that this cash will most likely be returned to shareholders you have a great deal, if you think the company will find a new way to light money on fire it's not attractivif you think the company will find a new way to light money on fire it's not attractive.

Is that a good value for shareholders, maybe not if a company burns through all it's cash only to have the share price return to normalcy.

Once (or should I say if) this pension / labour dispute is put to rest, I'd actually expect a rapid & substantial improvement in shareholder value — this might be a substantial return of capital or a tender offer (to distribute surplus cash), and / or a potential new partnership or even a takeover offer..?!

Furthermore, Rose says, the company is «reasonably» priced at a multiple of 16 to 17 times earnings if you assume that all the cash is being returned to shareholders.

If these companies have capital to allocate, and can't reinvest it attractively in the business, make sensible acquisitions with it or pay down debt, they have to either keep it around as cash equivalents or return it to shareholders.

As it stands, KGP / shareholders effectively earn nothing from this cash — but if this cash, for example, were returned tomorrow morning to shareholders, there's no reason to believe that would negatively affect Kingspan's P / S multiple (or its financial strength), and shareholders would have an additional 212 M cash to re-invest (or invest elsewhere).

If a company's financially strong, gross cash these days is a non-productive asset that could be returned to shareholders, or used for an earnings - enhancing acquisition.

All these look good for Kingspan, so if they utilised their «surplus» cash on an acquisition (for example), I see no risk / impairment to the business (& no impact on their usual working capital cycle)-- and obviously the return for shareholders should be far superior to an effective zero rate on idle cash!

If a company has too much spare cash, it may consider investing the surplus funds in new ventures and in case company is out of investment options it may be prudent to return the excess funds to shareholders in the form of increased dividend payments.

[And if cash were returned to shareholders, that potentially equates to an astonishing 28.5 % RoE!]

If a security is a stream of cash flows, returning those flows to shareholders over time (dividends, buybacks) will drive the stock price and help it trade (up presumably) with intrinsic value.

Forgone capital expenditure can be used to increase shareholder cash returns — buybacks if management believes that the company is undervalued, dividends if not.