Sentences with phrase «return defense verdicts»

Insurance carriers wont listen because juries often return defense verdicts on those facts.

On November 19, 2008, a Lee County, Alabama jury returned a defense verdict for Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. in a product liability suit in which the plaintiff alleged that a Dewalt small angle grinder was defectively designed.

The jury returned a defense verdict for our client while finding the other attorney liable.

After the jury returned a defense verdict for Resurgens and Dr. Daftaria, Elliott appealed to the court of appeals arguing that the trial judge's exclusion of Sullivan was an error.

Jury awarded a portion of the damages claimed on the drainage and development claims and returned a defense verdict on other claims.

After more than eight years of litigation, the jury returned a defense verdict on all five claims submitted.

The jury returned a defense verdict after deliberating for 50 minutes.

Both phases of the case took two weeks to try and at the conclusion of the second phase of the case, the jury returned a defense verdict after deliberating just 30 minutes.

After deliberating for two days, the jury returned a defense verdict.

The jury returned a defense verdict in 22 minutes.

After hearing the evidence, the jury returned a defense verdict after roughly two hours of deliberations.

The jury returned a defense verdict.

After a two week jury trial, the jury returned a defense verdict.

Not exact matches

In returning its verdict Thursday afternoon on the sixth day of deliberations, the Superior Court jury also pronounced Jose Ines Garcia Zarate not guilty of assault with a firearm, finding credence in defense attorneys» argument that the shot that ricocheted off the concrete ground before piercing Steinle's heart was an accident, with the gun discharging after the defendant stumbled upon it on the waterfront on July 1, 2015.

For example, defense attorneys» scores for Courtroom Demeanor, Sincerity, and Competence dropped twice as much as those of plaintiff attorneys when the juries returned unfavorable verdicts.

For example, on a scale of 1 = Excellent and 5 = Very Poor, jurors gave defense attorneys, on average, a competence score of 1.68 when they returned a verdict that was completely in favor of the defendant, 1.95 when they returned a split verdict, and 2.23 when they returned a verdict that was all in favor of the state / plaintiff.

However, even in the categories where jurors come close to rating both sides equally, the plaintiff attorneys are still not rated as low as the defense attorneys when the verdict is not returned in their favor and they are rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the verdict is returned in their favor.

If the jurors rated similarly situated attorneys equally, as one might expect, the lines on the graphs would appear as a perfect «X.» One would expect the defense attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the plaintiff attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the defendant on all counts and the plaintiff attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all counts.

After a five - day trial, the jury returned a unanimous defense verdict.

After a two - week trial and less than an hour of deliberations, the jury returned a complete defense verdict for our client, finding no conspiracy.

The jury of 12 returned a unanimous defense verdict.

The case was tried reverse bifurcated and after phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, finding that the decedent's mesothelioma was not caused by his asbestos exposure.

The case was tried reverse bifurcated and after 40 minutes the jury returned a verdict for the defense after the first phase of the case.

However, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, based on the plaintiff's inability to establish that her damages were a result of the accident.

Are there «classes» or types of criminal defense lawyers (like those who cop a plea and make a buck versus those who get crushed when the jury returns a guilty verdict)?

Siding with the arguments of an Orrick litigation team, a Los Angeles jury returned a complete defense verdict on behalf of Union Carbide Corp. and...

A California jury returned an 11 - 1 defense verdict in favor of Nissan North America, Inc. in the case Steiner v. Nissan.