Sentences with phrase «return of capital to shareholders for»

1,900 companies have spent money on buybacks and dividends since 2010, and the combined return of capital to shareholders for those companies equals 113 % of capital spending, according to Reuters.

Not exact matches

Otto Energy says the sale of its Galoc oil field assets in the Philippines to Singapore - based energy company Risco Energy Investments for $ 113.4 million will help fund exploration activities for two years and return capital to shareholders.

«We are moving forward with a continued sense of urgency on our four strategic priorities: narrowing our focus on clients, products, and geographies where we can grow profitably; driving for efficiency; growing through innovation and optimizing our data assets and client relationships; and returning excess capital to shareholders,» he added.

That said, we will continue to evaluate opportunities that maximize the risk adjusted returns on our capital for the benefit of our common shareholders.»

«RESOLVED, that the shareholders hereby approve, on an advisory basis, High River's proposal that Apple commit to completing not less than $ 50 billion of share repurchases during Apple's fiscal year ending September 27, 2014 (and increase the amount authorized for share repurchases under its Capital Return Program accordingly).»

Upon a «liquidity event» (a liquidation, return of capital, refinancing, sale or listing), the articles of the company provide for the exit proceeds to be distributed amongst the shareholders as follows:

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that shareholders invested in the fund is paid back to them.

This could potentially dash expectations for greater return of capital to shareholders.

«2014 was a great year for Marriott Vacations Worldwide, with adjusted EBITDA of $ 200 million, adjusted free cash flow of nearly $ 300 million and over $ 210 million of capital returned to our shareholders.

Management has made a priority of selling non-core assets to return capital to shareholders, but the company's prospects for sustainable long - term profit growth in a low - rate environment look increasingly bleak.

Reflecting a strong capacity for internal capital generation, the Group's Shareholders» Fund grew by 8 percent to N483.1 billion, whilst it delivered an annualized 18.2 % return on average equity (RoAE) and an Interim Dividend of N0.20 per Share.

«Your board recognises and accepts that remuneration levels across the industry have to adjust to the new reality of higher capital and lower returns for the sector,» he will tell shareholders.

We aim to generate value for our shareholders by delivering sustainable returns in the form of a regular, reliable and growing dividend, share repurchases, and long - term capital appreciation.

The dividend aristocrats are a great place to pick up some good companies and an excellent starting point for additional reseach into high quality dividend stocks with strong histories of returning capital to shareholders.

Well, except I'm not at all happy to see the board opting for a B Share return of capital, rather than a share buyback / tender — supposedly favoured by major shareholders, though I struggle to understand who would turn down an opportunity to enhance NAV?!

In the end, an AGAINST vote is a rejection of this no bid / no premium takeover of the company... it doesn't change the fact that shareholders deserve & should / will continue to push for a fairer & more sensible return of capital (ideally at a premium & for a larger amount).

With most of the consideration now in escrow & a successful EGM approval, the company will shortly propose a wind - up to yield an estimated GBP 54.4 p per share capital return (reflecting a 1.2191 GBP / USD rate) for shareholders.

One of our themes for investing in JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Morgan Stanley (MS) is increased returns of capital to shareholders.

The strong growth and cash flow from Humira, the continued development of their drug pipeline, and management's commitment to returning capital to shareholders through dividends has increased our estimate of fair value for the company and changed our holding period from one year to multiple years.

In fact, the return of capital via a tender offer should also provide further reassurance: Shareholders could be unfairly penalised if they accepted a tender offer based on incomplete info, and / or an NAV per share that did not represent market values for all assets (& liabilities)-- potentially exposing the board / company to legal action.

Cash & Share Buyback / Tenders: Consider the scale of the potential cash generation implied above, and Donegal's equally large discount to intrinsic value... A strategy of shrinking their outstanding share count is often the simplest & best way for companies to utilize cash, return capital & enhance shareholder value.

i) Tender Offer: Following last year's transfer of GBP 20 mio from EIIB's share premium account to distributable reserves, you stated «We are now reviewing options for possible future capital returns to shareholders and expect to reach a conclusion early next year after having finalised our long term capital requirements in consultation with the regulator.»

I think Death wins it slightly for me, lower depreciation and higher FCF suggests its less capital intensive, and EPS growth is close to Net Income growth which suggests a management mindful of shareholder returns.

Freeing up capital and management time & attention, to better exploit Asset Protection's growth opportunities (and perhaps return capital to shareholders), might be the catalyst required for a step - change in investor sentiment & the value of the business.

«The Board has decided that conditions are now right for a change in our capital policy and is considering a return of approximately # 10 million of excess capital to shareholders, more details of which will be provided to the market shortly.

The Board intends to continue its approach of considering returning to shareholders any excess of earnings over the sum of ordinary dividends for the financial year and increased capital requirements, normally in the form of special dividends.