Sentences with phrase «return on your money even»

You want to get the best return on your money even if it's your emergency fund.

Not exact matches

Even when investors stick to stock, bond, and mutual fund ownership, their rejection of simple investing basics such as low turnover results in pathetic returns on their money.

Even without suggesting that money will move «out of cash and into stocks,» one might argue that relative valuations are too wide, and that stocks should be priced to achieve lower long - term returns, given the poor returns available on bonds.

And you won't be taxed on that $ 5,000 contribution (or any returns it earns) until you take the money out at retirement, so your investment has a chance to grow even faster than in a regular investment account.

Even with the required private mortgage insurance when putting less than 20 % down, you can get a better return on your money in non-equity assets.

If you're earning an average of 10 % per year in your stock portfolio, but paying 12 % per year in interest on your credit cards, you are losing money — even though you seem to be making a higher return on your stock positions.

The Virginia Slims Championships will return to L.A. next year (in April) with even more prize money offered, and the details are being hammered out now on a contract with CBS calling for live TV coverage of six 1975 tournament finals on Saturday afternoons.

We should swap Walcott for Ross Barkley or even Lucas he's new podolski poor fella looks good player too» and why arsenal let szcheny go for 10 million we could of got atleast got sum juv player in return bad beisness if u ask me arsenal are already trying get back da lacasette cash if u ask me plus a free player come on wenger give us a. Big name we deserve it oh we should stayed at Highbury talking Highbury we had 11 world class players and no money compared to now and some1 please tell me we maybe have 3 world class players now and have massive cash makes no since I don't want be like citch but just 1 player just 1 to wake us all up like verrotti or naggnaliom of Rome I think that's how u spell it ok I'm done going watching fever pitch over and out fella gunners

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

There is no doubt that Bale needs to get the hell out of Real if he ever wants to be the kind of player he once was... this isn't to suggest that he his skills have diminished, he simply isn't the fiery, determined and aggressive player that struck fear in the hearts of his opponents... the small fish in a big pond just doesn't fit his profile... I can't even remember the last player I've seen who has become so invisible on the big stage (maybe Pogba last year)... maybe it's a case of culture shock or maybe he wasn't able to handle the notoriety that invariably came with his big money signing, but regardless of how it happened this guy is a shadow of his former self... although I doubt he would ever come to a team in such disarray, he could quite easily fill the shoes of Sanchez, who ironically was in a similar predicament in Barcelona, as Bale would return to his favoured left side and would be given the same freedoms that have allowed Sanchez to flourish... ultimately I think the cache of wearing a Real jersey and competing for the top trophies would be too difficult to give up for a wannabe club run by suits who care little about those kinds of accolades

I purchased them as my annual «Tax Return Splurge,» so even though they're wildly indulgent, I don't feel too bad about spending the money on something so quirky.

Sequels to comedies used to be pretty rare, but these days if you make even an okay amount of money studios are going to be much more willing to let you return for another go around rather than take the risk of making an original property on a large budget.

That was 58RMB, it was to expensive for me to afford.At first.I thought it was a good book, and I spend all my money on this book.And I was pretty annoyed about this I don't have any other money for my breakfast, lunch, and even dinner.I haven't drink juice for the whole year.Reading this is a waste of time, no one want to see this book again.It was just rubbish, and smelly book.It tells my nothing.I even want to sell this to the writer, and ask to return my money and some extra.It cost me too much time, and too much money on it.I prefer to see a movie instead!!!

We can't figure out how to save money even though we no longer have shipping or storage or printing or returns — Let's just pass on our anti-savings to readers.

And going trad may not require spending money up front, but you will be paying on the back end, and paying a lot: agent's fees, return reserves, and eternal rights giveaways (ebooks mean that your book will forever be «in print» so good luck getting it back even if it's selling a couple copies a year, unless the language in the contract stipulates otherwise).

You can even claim money back if you have the legit evidence for the same and the complete amount will be returned to you that you have spent on taking thermodynamics assignment help service.

The takeaway here is that you should always file your returns on time, even if you owe money and can't afford to pay.

Conversely, don't save your college or retirement money in safe, but low yielding money market funds when college or retirement are many years away; you will likely be missing out on many years of fat returns and your savings will even lose buying power from the erosion of inflation.

But I'd say the higher priority should be getting money into a tax - advantaged retirement account (a 401 (k) / 403 (b) / IRA), because the tax - advantaged growth of those accounts makes their long - term return far greater than whatever you're paying on your mortgage, and they provide more benefit (tax - advantaged growth) the earlier you invest in them, so doing that now instead of paying off the house quicker is probably going to be better for you financially, even if it doesn't provide the emotional payoff.

Even if a 401 (k) has limited investment choices or higher - than - average fees, carve out enough money from your paycheck to get the full company match, aka a guaranteed return on those investment dollars.

Even though a seller will not receive any money from a short - sale transaction, he or she may have to declare the discounted amount of the sale — the difference between the mortgage balance and the short sale — as income on federal tax returns.

But even double - digit investment returns won't do much good if you're not putting money aside on a regular basis.

Terekhova calculates that if Janice stashes $ 167,655 away annually for 18 years, she'll have over $ 3 million at age 52 when payments stop — even if she gets zero return on her money.

The one arguable reason to own commodities is to treat them as a random bouncing number, which may enhance returns (as long as you rebalance) even if on average commodities don't make money over inflation.

If you think it's going to go up even further, more than the return on your other options for where to put the money, keep the...

Learn to garner the best return possible on your invested money even in a bad market.

So consider how much banks are truly profiting on your money when a savings account offers you less than 1 % return on your money and the bank creates a loan with a 5 %, 10 % or even 30 % interest rate.

Earning high - interest returns on your money is certainly possible when using investment vehicles like the stock market and even cryptocurrencies.

IPOs, or new issues, can arise after venture capital financing, but these investments can lead to even lower returns Venture capital investors often only expect to make money on perhaps one in 10 of the companies they invest in.

Unlike many other investments, with a solar panel system you should expect to see immediate returns on your investment by saving you money on your electricity bill right away, even as you're paying on the lease or loan.

So you can see that high inflation (or even the fear of high inflation) causes bond buyers to demand a higher return on their money to protect their purchasing power.

If your employer matches your contributions, even just half of your contributions, that is an instant 50 % return on your money.

But a 1 % or 2 % return on your money — even if it is absolutely free of risk — is simply not enough for most people.

With the fifty cents per dollar match, you're making a 50 % return on your money, even before you invest it in the market!

I just would like to know if paying off debt (especially paying down a mortgage) is including as a part of that savings rate or even if part of that savings goes into a money market account paying non existent returns (to have cash on hand).

Of course, you may be able to get even better returns on your money if you forgo the targeted funds and pick and choose from other available options.

Obviously the best returns come in the latter situation but by focusing on expected returns, I have sometimes bought high P / E businesses too because even if there was a multiple contraction, there is good money to be made in a decade...

The example was used to show how irrational some clients can be; even when your returns are in the top 1 % of all investment managers out there, some people can still find something to complain about (as an aside, that is why the truly successful mutual fund managers quickly exit the public domain once they have made «enough», and then they tend to go super private by either managing their own money or investing privately on behalf of some particular clients that they know to be rational — when you're worth tens and tens of millions of dollars, you don't need to deal with people that don't truly believe that good value investing often means underperforming the S&P 500 at least one out of every three years).

As for people in the comments that point out you don't like mutual funds (I assume especially mutual funds with loads and / or high expense ratios)-- to that I say, as long as your employer is matching contributions (let's say 1:1) you start out with a 100 % gain on your money so even a miserable fund that only returns enough to cover fees — you still DOUBLE YOUR Mmoney so even a miserable fund that only returns enough to cover fees — you still DOUBLE YOUR MONEYMONEY.

Also, with Kasasa Cash and Kasasa Cash Back you can also get a Kasasa Saver savings and earn high rates of return on even more money.

Earn quarterly dividends on a variable - rate IRA, with rates adjusted monthly based on money market conditions, or earn an even higher rate of return with a fixed - rate Tax - Deferred IRA Certificate of one to five years.

my bank sent my check back because my husband not on my account every year they took it, but my husband passed away last year and they put that on my return we filed jointly and now i guess we wait ive learned that if you call it will take longer so i guess i just wait, the only thing is i had to pay my friends back that helped me with both my husband and daughters funeral, both were sudden so i wait the good news my husband was a vietnam veteran and the VA will be giving me money back not all for his funeral he was service connect disability after he passed away agent orange exposer but they do give me a dic benefit which is tax exempt, so just sharing so your people know a couple of things thank you, question when they issue a check willit still have my husbands name on it even tho he passed away and yes it is on the irs paper work just wondering thank you blessings

Even if the funds aren't the best, you don't want to turn down a 100 % return on your money.

And if you owe money on your tax return, the urgency to file your return is even greater because the amount you owe is only going to grow the longer you delay.

All costs (even small costs spread over time) reduce the return on your money.

JA: It's funny that international stocks outperformed the US, but there's this home bias that people have, and I think a lot of individuals might have missed out on some even greater returns because they might have just kept their money in the U.S.

The growth of software - based asset management firms that help individuals minimize fee expenses, such as FeeX, don't even bother projecting potential returns for actively managed funds, instead pointing out to consumers how much money they can save on fees by investing in low - cost index funds.

Without getting overly complicated, even if you had to pay PMI because you put less than 20 % down, the added costs of the PMI would not exceed the additional return you would gain on the money invested elsewhere.

For our example, with AAA bonds at 5 %, investors would on average require an 8 % return to even consider committing money to stocks.

You can also allocate your scheduled work bonus or even tax return money for this instead of using that significant amount of money on non-essentials.