Sentences with phrase «return on your money if»

Using round numbers as an example, an employee earning $ 100,000 contributing 5 % can sock away $ 5,000 and get a 100 % return on their money if the employer matches that contribution.

Another reason we went for Costa is due to the «Buzz» chart, which gives you daily returns on your money if one of your players ranks highest in news coverage on any given day.

I will get a lot better return on my money if I do as those loans have a 4 - 7 % intrest rates compared to the pathetic intrest rate on my savings account.

Of course, you may be able to get even better returns on your money if you forgo the targeted funds and pick and choose from other available options.

However, with these tips, there is a possibility that you could get a good return on your money if you are willing to take the time to do the research.

Not exact matches

If too much money is invested in safe, risk - free U.S. Treasury bonds, that basically insures a very low return on an investment.

If your company has no strategy for growth, you are saying to investors that their money may be going to a good cause, but they are not going to see a return on their investment.

Those who put all the money they can back into their business often believe they will get a better return on investment than if they had used the money investing elsewhere.

If you want to really get into the nitty - gritty of it, there are certain instances in which you can claim a Child and Dependent Care Credit on your federal tax return — but those instances come with a host of restrictions, and the amount of money you can claim is capped.

A standard lease states the landlord is required to release the money within 30 to 60 days after you vacate the property if you've met all of your obligations, such as making all rent payments, moving out of the apartment on time, returning the property in good condition, etc..

After a slow and grudging response to the initial revelations, Cameron finally published six years of personal tax returns at the weekend, and for good measure Monday promised new legislation to make companies criminally liable if they fail to stop their employees laundering money on clients» behalf.

For instance, if you realize that you've been spending a great deal of money advertising on Facebook without getting good returns, seek out that expert in Facebook or paid advertising who can best guide and coach you in leveraging this medium (along with other options).

Again, putting money into the market involves taking on a certain amount of risk so this isn't a strategy you should jump into if you're not comfortable with the possibility of losing some of your money or waiting a bit longer to see a return.

There's quite a bit of research, based on historical returns, that finds if you retire at age 65, you can withdraw 4 % a year (plus inflation adjustments) from your nest egg with only a small risk of outliving your money.

If you do, you risk wasting money on a person, in addition to a monthly subscription fee, potentially tripling your costs, just to outsource work that offers you no return on your investment.

For a mine project like Suncor's Fort Hills, with about 25 per cent of construction already completed, the forward - looking decision would imply a return on the balance of capital invested of 12.5 per cent — now, the project returns overall might be lower than that, but when you're considering a decision to abandon a partially built mine, you're not likely to get much of a return on they money you've already invested in it if you don't continue building.

If you so choose, the return on your money can be had over months 12 - 24 in the form of repayments.

After bills, you may find yourself compelled to use up the rest on some Boxing Day sales, but if you have the willpower to sustain those ideas, you'll walk away with extra money you can use for emergencies or reinvesting in your business when you return from your vacation.

If you can keep your savings above the required minimum balance, a money market account can offer you greater returns on your savings over time.

Based on the above example then, if the liquidation preference is 2.0 X, Seed investors are guaranteed 2.0 X times their money back assuming the startup returns at least $ 500,000 to its shareholders (i.e. 2.0 X the $ 250,000 Seed round size).

That cash remains offshore, but Apple, which paid more than $ 6 billion in taxes in the United States last year on its American operations, could still have to pay federal taxes on it if the company were to return the money to its coffers in the United States.

A lot of insiders are thus willing to pay what is in effect a custodianship fee to those they reckon can be relied on to return their money... That only makes sense if they expect any borrower offering positive interest rates to be essentially insolvent, either already or soon.

I also told her that if she would not supply the information I would be buying a money order and returning it to the address on the envelope I received.

Iran moved this month to formally unify its official and open market exchange rates and banned money changing outside of banks, after its currency, the rial, plunged to an all - time low on concerns about a possible return of sanctions if the United States exits a multilateral nuclear accord.

Assuming the exact same investments above, if you were to pay 20 % carry on each of your investments, despite not generating any profit, you would still have to pay the full $ 20K in carry on the one successful investment, and would therefore end up with less money than you started with, or $ 80K returned (probably less after other fees and expenses).

If you are looking for a way to earn significant returns on your money without needing to actually own the property, consider becoming a hard money lender.

Thus, if we look at bonds from a historical perspective, interest rates are very low — which is great for those borrowing money — but not so great for those that wish to see higher rates of interest, and return, on their money.

Manafort, 68, and Gates, 45, remain under home confinement on pledges to pay $ 10 million and $ 5 million, respectively, if they fail to return to court after pleading not guilty Oct. 30 to charges of conspiracy, money laundering and making false lobbyist registration statements in connection with their work advising a Russia - friendly political party in Ukraine.

But then if you save or if you retire and you withdraw money, then the sequence of returns will matter and then you should be scared about a stock market drop early on in your retirement.

If the holders of these funds can not show how they earned the money legally and properly declared it on their tax returns and other financial statements, a legal case can be made that it belongs rightly to the Russian people.

If the rate of return on your money is lower than the inflation rate you're actually losing money by keeping yours in a money market account.

If you're earning an average of 10 % per year in your stock portfolio, but paying 12 % per year in interest on your credit cards, you are losing money — even though you seem to be making a higher return on your stock positions.

If youre wealthy you likely make money through a business or capital gains where you can squeeze out lower rates than normal workers or deduct more on your returns to acheive a lower rate.

Therefore, if your investment totals $ 1,050 12 months later, that means the annual return on your money is 5...

If you use the money for something that does not qualify, or you simply withdraw the money for no specific reason, you will likely have to include it as income on your tax return and pay income tax on it.

If you are looking for a dependable return on your money, but don't need to tap into your money for a length of time, a CD may be a good savings option.

Discover also offers a 30 - day money back guarantee on its personal loans, so if you find a better rate elsewhere, you can return your loan money with no interest charged.

Yes the «standard» balancing the books stuff is monotonous but I'd wager a hefty amount if it was your money / investment you wouldn't be so gung - ho on the spending front — especially if you could see a decent return at low risk with the current business model.

I think we have money there to devote to the secondary — and it's our highest marginal return in terms of on field production (or second highest if you're all about edge).

But say if Arsenal hadn't spent money on securing Lucas Perez, could Campbell have played backup to Giroud until Welbeck returned from injury?

Learn how to cover for per, learn how to cover rhe left side if ozils playing there, learn how to take free kicks, learn how to defend set pieces, (mtm and zonally), learn how to communicate well on the pitch especially with the goal keeper, learn to be a leader and motivate and instruct clearly during a match, learn to not get any hopes up for a diaby return, learn to accept wenger does nt like campbell or poldi, learb to accept our club is 100 % in it for the money..........

We should swap Walcott for Ross Barkley or even Lucas he's new podolski poor fella looks good player too» and why arsenal let szcheny go for 10 million we could of got atleast got sum juv player in return bad beisness if u ask me arsenal are already trying get back da lacasette cash if u ask me plus a free player come on wenger give us a. Big name we deserve it oh we should stayed at Highbury talking Highbury we had 11 world class players and no money compared to now and some1 please tell me we maybe have 3 world class players now and have massive cash makes no since I don't want be like citch but just 1 player just 1 to wake us all up like verrotti or naggnaliom of Rome I think that's how u spell it ok I'm done going watching fever pitch over and out fella gunners

If you pay your hard earned money on the club, you expect them to give you something back in return.

Steve Bould should do the right thing and question Wenger on this aspect of our game, if he is told it will stay the same way Bould should walk, instead of collecting easy wage the rest of the back room staff and manager do all because they return big money for Kronke.

«Sometimes we have to spend part of Monday on the road, but if we don't we try to get some of our business done that day, like sending our accounts to the man who handles our money and makes out our tax returns.»

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

There is no doubt that Bale needs to get the hell out of Real if he ever wants to be the kind of player he once was... this isn't to suggest that he his skills have diminished, he simply isn't the fiery, determined and aggressive player that struck fear in the hearts of his opponents... the small fish in a big pond just doesn't fit his profile... I can't even remember the last player I've seen who has become so invisible on the big stage (maybe Pogba last year)... maybe it's a case of culture shock or maybe he wasn't able to handle the notoriety that invariably came with his big money signing, but regardless of how it happened this guy is a shadow of his former self... although I doubt he would ever come to a team in such disarray, he could quite easily fill the shoes of Sanchez, who ironically was in a similar predicament in Barcelona, as Bale would return to his favoured left side and would be given the same freedoms that have allowed Sanchez to flourish... ultimately I think the cache of wearing a Real jersey and competing for the top trophies would be too difficult to give up for a wannabe club run by suits who care little about those kinds of accolades

... i believe the kind of investment that arsenal puts on the team is not proportional to the profit thats gained by the club and thats why you will hear year in year out how our returns eclipsed all the other teams but when it comes to investing in the team that brings these profits, its the other way round... what is the use of having money just laying in the bank idle while we can make better use of it by investing well on it???... i honestly don't believe that we will lift another major trophy with mr arsene as our manager... i just don't see it and if you disagree then care to tell me how

Is this guy for real, he says he can't fault the commitment WHAT commitment, if he can't see that he is killing this club by his arrogence and his lack of judgement in buying players on the cheap and sticking with the ones who have nothing to add to the game, Walcott Oxy Gibbs earn huge money but give nowt in return.

It is rather unfortunate that us fans suffer from not winning any major trophy over the years.What Leicester did was just one off, it will not happen for the next few decades.Football is all about investment, to win u have to invest well with some luck.Everton did look at where they are now.We are not at the level of Real, Barca Manu u name them.The big clubs invest heavily and still get some return on their investment.Arsenal will not spend like city or chelsea or PSG.We will go down like Leeds.Let us be honest with ourselves, if u were the owner of this club u will never sack Wenger.He brings u lot of money year in year out.