Sentences with phrase «return on your money less»

In turn, it makes the overall return on your money less volatile.

Not exact matches

Other benefits of investments using debt include tax advantages and a higher return on my investment (ROI) because I've used less of my own money to purchase the asset.

Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?

Assuming the exact same investments above, if you were to pay 20 % carry on each of your investments, despite not generating any profit, you would still have to pay the full $ 20K in carry on the one successful investment, and would therefore end up with less money than you started with, or $ 80K returned (probably less after other fees and expenses).

This new money means he will have to buy stocks in a company he is less keen on, and accordingly which will are likely to make lower returns.

Even with the required private mortgage insurance when putting less than 20 % down, you can get a better return on your money in non-equity assets.

Now take the money you have put aside into cash when times are good and reinvest after market correction and you are looking at a significant market return that will put the look of envy on others less savvy then yourself.

They say it shows that venture capitalists, desperate to invest in the next Facebook or LinkedIn, are blindly throwing money at start - ups that have not shown they can build something useful, much less a business that can provide decent returns on investment.

McLaughlin said she knew from the beginning she would have less money than other candidates, remarking that during her time as Albany County Democratic Committee chairwoman she focused her efforts on raising funds for the party, but now those she helped haven't returned the favor.

But many have questioned throwing money at the problem — Newark schools already spend $ 22,000 a pupil, more than double the national average, and like many inner - city districts has hardly seen a return on that investment at test time (less than half of fourth graders are proficient in English).

Thanks to the innovation and creativity of fund sponsors â $» and, yes, the greed of investors â $» the return that investors received on their money was less than a third of the return offered by the stock market itself.

When you have to sell stock for less money than you invested, you can write off the loss on your tax return.

Since the Fund's launch in 1989, investors have doubled their money every 10 years, no matter when they bought the fund... The fund has outperformed global equities with 1/3 less risk [based on annualized standard deviation of monthly returns for Institutional shares from 2/28/89 to 12/31/13, compared to the FTSE World Index].

So consider how much banks are truly profiting on your money when a savings account offers you less than 1 % return on your money and the bank creates a loan with a 5 %, 10 % or even 30 % interest rate.

By leaving you less money to invest, moreover, you end up losing not only the commissions and fees themselves, but also the big returns that the money you spend on them would have produced had you been able to keep it in your portfolio.

My original calculations estimated I would basically be getting about a 20 % annual return (based on the rent money that was now no longer going to be spent on utilities), but after it was all said and done it has only proven to yield about 6 % (which isn't the end of the world, but a lot less than I wanted).

Unless you've parked your money in government bonds, with their guaranteed rates of return, you need to check on your investments regularly to make sure they're beating the market — and doing so more substantially and less expensively than other, similar options.

The biggest selling point of eToro is supposed to be it's copy trade feature, but it has been made very dangerous because many outside traders come to eToro with a small capital and take insane risks to make huge returns and get copiers and guru bonuses fast; this never works as they always blow the account anyway; this week a star trader called TheSizzle blew his account and the money of over 3000 copiers, and it's his third blown account on eToro in less than 1 year.

Many thanks for the people contributing to SM discussion, some one mentioned that the return of seg fund is only less than 5 % for segreagated funds, let me assure you I have invested 25K in segregated fund and the return of that fund since 1998 is above 13 %, I invested my client's RRSP money in segregated funds most of them have a return of above 1o % and the MER is 2.5 %, when I invest my clients money I made sure that it is my money, if any one is planing SM and if you invest in Seg fund, it is almost 100 % guarentied at the same time based on the past performance, the reurn is above 10 % since 1998, I can not predict the future performance but the past performace is above 10 %, if you are skeptical please email I will send the details `, my email ID is [email protected], this is not a business pitch just an expression and exchange of details based on my experience and research

Less money spent on goods and services will eventually hurt the revenue and profit of businesses, which will impact stock market returns.

My point is simply that it's very likely that if you are moving money in and out of stocks based on volatility, you're much less likely to get the full market return over the long term, and might be better off putting more weight in asset classes with lower volatility.

Sure, it's great that it still earned money, but based on the risk that you took on by investing in this fund, your return is much less than expected, which is why your alpha will display as − 4.0.

Baby boomers, on the other hand, were more likely to prefer conservative growth, with smaller returns but less chance of losing money.

(When a higher rate of return on pension assets is assumed companies can set less money aside, boosting earnings.

To get the most out of your money, select a savings account with a high rate of return like First IB's Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250money, select a savings account with a high rate of return like First IB's Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250Money Market Savings account which earns a 0.90 % APY (annual percentage yield) on daily balances of $ 250,000 or less, and 1.16 % APY on balances greater than $ 250,000.

Why leave money in equities, and risk another year of lost opportunity, when fixed income securities seem to be on the road to higher (and less risky) returns?

The stock market has averaged around 6 - 7 % annual total return over the long - term, so by investing instead of paying down debt you are in fact earning an incremental profit (or less opportunity cost on your money).

Believe it or not, the less money you put down on a rental property, the higher your return on investment will be.

You can still make money doing this, but you will make less and take on more risk to earn those lower returns.

It's not great that your money is growing at less than inflation but if you're saving for something like a downpayment on a house I would think that (nominal) capital preservation is probably more important than the potential for a higher return with the associated higher risk.

In 2011, the five big banks in Canada paid out less than 2 % on their RESP's Group providers are fewer and some of these are non-profit foundations — this will explain the higher rate of interest earned (4.7 to 7.4 % in 2011) Students also benefit from additional monies from attrition and enhancement, and group plan fees are up front, yes, but some providers refund some or all of your fees at maturity — you will never see a bank return your fees (or any mutual based investment) Investing in bonds or GIC's is certainly safe, but you won't collect any government grant unless you're in a registered RESP — this can mean 20 - 40 % more money for your child.

Without getting overly complicated, even if you had to pay PMI because you put less than 20 % down, the added costs of the PMI would not exceed the additional return you would gain on the money invested elsewhere.

If Pimco abandons them (unlikely, but not impossible), Janus would get the chance to use them on much less money, which would make the excess returns greater.

Thus, if you are spending less than $ 6000 annually on travel / dining, your net return is less than 2 % and you could be putting more money in your pocket with a no annual fee 2 % cash back card.

I then showed him that to achieve his $ 4 million goal in 10 years, including the savings from his salary over that period, he would need to earn less than the rate of return on a money market account.

If you only use a card for optimal use scenarios, card issuers make less money because you are reducing the average return on each transaction.

To make paying up sting a little less, JetBlue is giving away 1,000 free flights to tax payers who owe money on their returns this year.

If spending on carbon schemes isn't necessary, then the money should be returned to the tax payer in the form of less tax.

And as you begin to pay down your loan, (perhaps with the cash flow from your new rental property), you are actually increasing your rate of return on your money because paying down your principal in your loan is causing less interest to accrue.

But the rate of return is lower on average than simply investing the money in an IRA, and the fees involved in redeeming the cash — called surrendering the policy — make it less than ideal.

So consider how much banks are truly profiting on your money when a savings account offers you less than 1 % return on your money and the bank creates a loan with a 5 %, 10 % or even 30 % interest rate.

Based on my math, the senior that can borrow the money for short - return improvements for energy efficiency will be cash - flow positive with lower energy bills and a debt service that is less than energy savings.

If I can spend less on the renovations than the return on my money will be even more so conservatively renovating makes the most sense.

Why would a Realtor who is already (by dint of his / her own efforts) making a good living «without» giving away a significant percentage of his / her income on a deal - a-month-or-more standard then decide to start giving away significant money in an effort to gain more business for «less» income per transaction... (has anyone heard of the negative economic principle known as «the principle of diminishing returns»?)

Through borrowing money, investors have less of their own cash tied into each of their real estate properties and are able to make a greater return on their cash invested.