Sentences with phrase «return on your money rather»

That way, you can start earning high rates of return on your money rather than paying high rates to fill up a bank's coffers.

It's more of a passive source of return on your money rather than a business you can start from home.

That way, you can start earning high rates of return on your money rather than paying high rates to fill up a bank's coffers.

That way, you can start earning high rates of return on your money rather than paying high rates to fill up a bank's coffers.

Not exact matches

Rather, it simply tells us we should definitely be on the lookout for the possible return of institutional buying and money flow into leading stocks.

Some amazing ventures have been funded through Crowd Sourcing, but many investors are looking for returns on their money and would rather own shares of a business than receive a pre-order for a product.

Coworkly, a side project that's currently dominating the majority of Arar's time, arose from a desire to fill a gap he's seen in Ottawa for many years now — namely, a community of startups that focus on venture capital and raising money rather than returning to the basics of bootstrapping and profitability.

Moreover, many advisers said that executives now feared that spending money on a deal rather than returning it to shareholders would invite activist scrutiny.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It is rather unfortunate that us fans suffer from not winning any major trophy over the years.What Leicester did was just one off, it will not happen for the next few decades.Football is all about investment, to win u have to invest well with some luck.Everton did look at where they are now.We are not at the level of Real, Barca Manu u name them.The big clubs invest heavily and still get some return on their investment.Arsenal will not spend like city or chelsea or PSG.We will go down like Leeds.Let us be honest with ourselves, if u were the owner of this club u will never sack Wenger.He brings u lot of money year in year out.

«In the end, we would save more money than we would spend by having a public financing system that allows people to run based on contributions from ordinary citizens rather than from special interest looking for something in return from the federal or state budget,» she said.

«Rather than force New York City riders and low - income families to pay more... the governor should return the money he diverted and support a tax on millionaires to bring the system into the 21st century.»

Sequels to comedies used to be pretty rare, but these days if you make even an okay amount of money studios are going to be much more willing to let you return for another go around rather than take the risk of making an original property on a large budget.

If you're far enough along on your home loan such that your mortgage - interest tax deduction isn't worth much, and you plan to invest the money through a tax - qualified account such as a Roth IRA rather than a taxable account, that may skew the numbers in favor of investing over paying down the mortgage — assuming you're fairly certain about your market returns.

Walk into a fast food restaurant and give them some money, in return you'll be happy to get a rather quick return on your investment in the form -LSB-...] Read More

I would rather borrow from the bank at 2.5 per cent on my mortgage and invest my RRSP at a higher return, thereby making money on the spread between those percentages.

There is also good data about buying when the market is as low as it is (which could be negative as in example # 1), but if you're a newbie to that, I would still suggest paying off the CC first (a good 20 % return on the money, to your pocket and not to the CC company's) rather than entering into a volatile (read risky) market that you do not understand.

I have been considering different ways to generate some returns on my money, rather than just having it sit in a savings account at the bank.

So rather than tying your retirement prospects to a bet on one or two assets, you're better off spreading your money around and owning a wide array of stocks and bonds that can generate reasonable returns without gut - wrenching volatility.

The more you pay in fees, rather than investing the money and earning a return, the more you are missing out on.

Second, when a hedge fund charges excessive management fees, which are based on size of assets under management, rather than performance fees which are based on how much money they make for you, a hedge fund manager tends to focus more on growing AUM rather than generating the highest possible risk adjusted returns.

On top of the fact that your money is going towards an asset that isn't giving you much of a return, a house has costs that a rental simply doesn't have (or rather, it does have them, but they are wrapped into your rent)- closing costs as a buyer, realtor fees and closing costs as a seller, maintenance costs, and constantly escalating property taxes are examples of things that renters deal with only in an indirect sense.

Let's assume that the goal of diversification is to reduce our risk by taking on new, uncorrelated risks in order to seek equitylike returns at bondlike risk — our industry's holy grail — rather than merely to invest some of our money in low - volatility markets.8 Most would suggest that other risky assets should serve this purpose — if they offer an uncorrelated risk premium (e.g., if that risk premium is related to risk, not to beta).

Also, the high costs involved may raise questions regarding the expected returns from such very expensive deals, and if the principle aim is to capture a large number of newcomers rather than showing existing clients that their broker is so well established and capitalized that it can spend money on such costly partnerships.

Wilson says Gambitious got into this business not for a gold rush, but rather the opposite — to carefully protect and enhance the massive opportunity that the new funding models present for independent developers, rather than see it squandered by over-promising and under - delivering on projects, especially in cases where people are investing significant amounts of their money hoping for a return.

Even so the return you get from going solar in Georgia is likely to be around the 10 % mark and at this level it seems crazy that people prefer to have their money in the bank at 1 % rather than in a solar system on their roof that returns 10 %.

I'm assuming they would rather finance to me because (charging 10 % interest) i'm going to pay them 10 % on their money for 15 - 30 years which is a great return for them, and they have no landlord duties.