Sentences with phrase «return over long»

Stocks give the highest return over the long term.

Any asset that provides a secure regulated rate of return over a long period can be valued as a utility which may trade at higher multiples of revenue than traditional integrated telecoms firms.

The EEG required utility companies to plug all renewable power producers, down to the smallest rooftop solar panel, into the national grid and buy their power at a fixed, slightly above - market rate that guaranteed a modest return over the long term.

Core real estate, as represented by the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries Property Index, tends to have similar volatility to corporate and government bonds with a higher return over the long term.

History has also shown that a diversified portfolio of Canadian and foreign investments offers the right mix of lower risk and higher return over the long run.

Such a distribution would result in roughly a 7.3 % average annual return over the long haul.

Since we know that stocks are ultimately likely to give you the best return over the long run, your job is to make sure that you have as many of those assets as possible, so that your returns will be multiplied across all those assets after a long, healthy period of investing!

Investments that are able to compound at a steady rate of return over a long period of time can grow into a much larger future value.

The managers seek total return over the long term.

Figure # 1 tells us that higher risk investments will carry a higher average return over the long run.

However, from a mindful perspective, it feels like nothing much is lost by taking a reasonable chance of suffering a 41 % draw down instead of a 32 % drawdown, and something is clearly gained by having a good chance of an added percent or so of return over the long term.

A dividend can produce as much as a quarter of your total return over long periods.

Like our Fidelity Fund Portfolios, these Fidelity Fund Portfolios — Income, have a focus on total return over the long run.

In a good business, i.e. one that is able to reinvest capital at a high rate of return over a long period of time, the results can be dramatic, as seen in the coffee can portfolio.

But you may want to allocate more of your funds toward the riskier investments that hopefully provide a higher return over the long term.

So by investing in small cap stocks, you have a good chance of earning a higher return over the long term compared to large cap stocks and you can do so on a regular basis too.

I'm not saying a lot more aggressive, but maybe a little bit less conservative, having a little bit more stock allocation for the long term, staying invested, than their percentage rate or return over the long term would be actually significantly higher than men, I would say.

The stock market has averaged around 6 - 7 % annual total return over the long - term, so by investing instead of paying down debt you are in fact earning an incremental profit (or less opportunity cost on your money).

Namely, stocks, having no expiration (unlike most bonds) and being the most junior stakeholders in a company's capital structure (therefore paid after bondholders in a hypothetical bankruptcy scenario), typically provide the highest return over the long - run.

You may not be able to generate an 8 % RRSP return over the long - run, but 4 - 5 % in a balanced portfolio or 6 - 7 % in an aggressive one may not be unrealistic.

These are riskier but may provide higher return over the long - run.

The ETF seeks after - tax total return over the long - term by focusing on investment - grade taxable and tax - exempt bonds

But with the stock selection that you're using, make sure that you understand risk and expected a return and use the right asset classes to kind of boost your return over the long term.

That mix should be enough to provide a 4 % expected return over the long term, with relatively low volatility.

George can reduce his mutual fund fees and get broad diversification in his RRSP with a simple balanced fund that should reward him with a decent 4 % annual return over the long run.

My point is simply that it's very likely that if you are moving money in and out of stocks based on volatility, you're much less likely to get the full market return over the long term, and might be better off putting more weight in asset classes with lower volatility.

Keep in mind that this yield is also more than 150 basis points higher than its five - year average, which leads back to one of the points I made earlier about undervaluation and higher yield (which then results in more current income, more aggregate income, and potentially higher total return over the long run).

Dividends can produce as much as a third of your total return over long periods, and you can even retire on dividends.

The truth is that dividends aren't just a component of the market's total return over the long term; they're the main component.

Most have achieved their fortunes by compounding a moderate but consistent rate of return over a long period of time.There is a simple mathematical explanation for why these two factors are most important in building wealth:

Further, there is substantial evidence that periodically rebalancing to target adds an additional 50Bps annualized return over the long term.

If you have any real experience with socking wealth away, protecting it in some form or helping others to do so, you will be profoundly happy with a 9.7 % average return over a long period of time.

Stock index funds will average about 10 % return over the long - term.

The last of this thread - money market funds, which tend to offer lowest risk, but with attendant lowest return over the long run.

Most of our investments have characteristics that have been associated empirically with above - average investment rates of return over long measurement periods: a low stock price in relation to book value, a low price - to - earnings ratio, a low price - to - cash - flow ratio, an above - average dividend yield, a low price - to - sales ratio compared to other companies in the same industry, a significant pattern of purchases by insiders, a significant decline in share price.

A dividend growth portfolio is the sole way to maximize your total return over the long - term.

By sticking to companies that have the means to pay high dividend yields, you not only get the added bonus of a regular paycheque from your portfolio (now electronically deposited in your investing account), but studies show that you'll likely enjoy a higher rate of return over the long run than the market typically provides.

Dividends can produce as much as a third of your total return over long periods.

Perhaps we may even eke out a bit more return over the long run (but don't count on it!).

I think a 50/50 small and large value allocation will produce a 10 to 12 percent return over the long term.

Thus, maximizing your overall total return over the long - term.

I'm banking on the average return over the long term to be positive.

Clearly not all consumers are going to buy into the idea of an 8 % rate of return over the long term.

Posted fixed mortgage rates have always been above government bond yields so paying off your house will offer a higher return over the long - term.

A value stock, and value stocks do have a higher expected return over the long term.

This isn't necessarily a bad thing, because as I pointed out above, momentum exposure can add to a fund's return over the long term.

This process clearly involves more by the farmer (investment, time, etc) on the front end, but may provide a higher return over the long term.

The truth is that dividends aren't just a component of the market's total return over the long term; they're the main component.

In short, investors have gained about a 5 % annualized excess return over the long term by investing in stocks rather than bills or bonds.

Very simply, they are high quality businesses that can grow their intrinsic value at high rates of return over long periods of time.