Sentences with phrase «returns on your money because»

Growth and income mutual funds are fine tools, but they won't make you anywhere near optimal returns on your money because they're too conservative.

And as you begin to pay down your loan, (perhaps with the cash flow from your new rental property), you are actually increasing your rate of return on your money because paying down your principal in your loan is causing less interest to accrue.

Not exact matches

«The more you put in today, the much more you'll have later down the road because of the time value of money and the growth on investment returns,» Michael Solari, a certified financial planner with Solari Financial Management, told Business Insider.

Just because you don't shoot for double - digit returns doesn't make you a bad person; it just makes you the investor that you really are when you put your money on the line.

Noting that the San Francisco ride - sharing startup lost somewhere north of $ 1.2 billion in the first half of 2016, Bloomberg's Justin Fox says that's a problem not because Uber's in danger of running out of money — it has raised around $ 15 billion — but because it spent that money without getting anything concrete in return, on ephemeral stuff like incentives to attract new drivers.

Other benefits of investments using debt include tax advantages and a higher return on my investment (ROI) because I've used less of my own money to purchase the asset.

Not only will Whole Foods be able keep construction costs relatively low, it can also save money on occupancy costs because of the smaller size of the stores — thus achieving higher returns on capital.

Saving more money can offset lower returns because you're compounding on top of compounding.

Loads of startup companies out there have the potentials to grow, expand and make huge returns on investment, but their growth and profitability is limited because the owners might not have the required money to invest into it.

Because the income is guaranteed, you probably won't earn a large return on your money.

Managing lots of money acts as an anchor on returns because the opportunity set becomes smaller when managing more money.

Steve Bould should do the right thing and question Wenger on this aspect of our game, if he is told it will stay the same way Bould should walk, instead of collecting easy wage the rest of the back room staff and manager do all because they return big money for Kronke.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Ticket Prices rise (as do players wages because of the amount of money in the game: TV rights, facility and stadium development etc) So why can't we expect a little more success and return on our investments?

We should not dream high about euphoric transfer market signings because we have to accept that though we may be a wealthy club because recently KPMG had valuations of Football Clubs where Arsenal stands 6 in most Valuable Football brands but still we have to accept that our Owner don't want to spend money to improve team... Owner is happy on the returns he is earning from Arsenal...

How can you be accused of neglect when there is no abuse well cps said we both need to see doctors we both need to see them for a medical physiological evaluation all because we objected to a false claim from a hospital a hospital that did a forced c section on my wife so that they could receive more money from DSHS The cash machine for the poor who in return take's babies to keep there service going selling babies for 25.000 dollars yes it's a sick system one that «Hitler Would be proud of The SS worker who brought a Sheriff with her all to see yes our child, is safe yes we care for him!

It stands without challenge also that individuals would prefer investing monies in treasuries because they assure returns on investments.

Singas said those funds were some of the same monies at issue in Ippolito's federal case — with a $ 400,000 difference because Nassau prosecutors focused on Ippolito's return to a period of government employment that started in 2009.

Meanwhile, on Thursday, Edward Mangano's defense attorney, Kevin Keating of Garden City, sought to establish that the money Gulino gave Mangano couldn't have been a bribe because the contractor got nothing improper or unusual in return from the county executive.

The New York State Pension Fund, and the taxpayers who have to backstop it, have lost billions of dollars because Tom DiNapoli made risky investments on Wall Street in an attempt to meet an unrealistic return expectation that any private sector money manager in America — except maybe Bernie Madoff — would know is a fallacy.»

Most of the companies and manufacturers of these kinds of products do not focus on the benefits their products can give to patients and consumers because they focus more on the return of money.

We can do it in scale now because we have it on Mondeo, S - Max, Edge, and now Fiesta - so the dealer can invest the money and get a return.

If you supply us with your taxpayer ID at a later date, we can not return the withheld tax money because we do not retain it — it is passed on to the government by law.

Because it helps us focus our sales and marketing efforts on the sales channels that deliver the highest return on our investments of time and money.

That's a big advantage because you can earn returns on the money in the account — and the returns are never taxed.Roth IRAs provide after - tax savings, meaning there's no tax break today, but all contributions grow and can be withdrawn tax - free in retirement.

But the new addition might cause more than a little confusion because it depends both on the returns generated by the portfolio and the flow of money into, and out of, it.

«Anyone who has significant consumer debt should probably pay down debt because you're getting a risk-less return on your money,» he said.

But I'd say the higher priority should be getting money into a tax - advantaged retirement account (a 401 (k) / 403 (b) / IRA), because the tax - advantaged growth of those accounts makes their long - term return far greater than whatever you're paying on your mortgage, and they provide more benefit (tax - advantaged growth) the earlier you invest in them, so doing that now instead of paying off the house quicker is probably going to be better for you financially, even if it doesn't provide the emotional payoff.

This is because term insurance, being pure risk protection, provides life cover based on the level of risk of mortality associated with the policyholder and doesn't provide money back or returns.

I'm sour on my daughter's RESP (Heritage) because we could have gotten a better return putting the money into ING direct.

Money grows faster in a retirement account than in a non-retirement account, because you invest pretax dollars and don't pay taxes on your investment returns each year, both of which help your money grow faMoney grows faster in a retirement account than in a non-retirement account, because you invest pretax dollars and don't pay taxes on your investment returns each year, both of which help your money grow famoney grow faster.

Neil Woodford — BBC Hardtalk 30 minute interview This Stephen Sackur BBC interview with London Value Investor Conference speaker Neil Woodford covers a variety of topics including the reasons for Neil's stunning success as a fund manager, the skill sets that he thinks are important for managers and entrepreneurs, his thoughts on the Eurozone; plus Neil also comments on the lack of value for money that the fund management industry is providing to clients because many funds are «taking fees for active management and returning passive yields».

The biggest selling point of eToro is supposed to be it's copy trade feature, but it has been made very dangerous because many outside traders come to eToro with a small capital and take insane risks to make huge returns and get copiers and guru bonuses fast; this never works as they always blow the account anyway; this week a star trader called TheSizzle blew his account and the money of over 3000 copiers, and it's his third blown account on eToro in less than 1 year.

The disadvantages of this strategy are the complicated tax calculations and that you have almost all of your money invested in a fund chosen for its ROC distribution — not because it is the best investment based on risk / return / tax - efficiency.

If you're a real estate investor, the cash value of your policy can be accessed for real estate investments and the return on investment can be exponential because you're making a return on the funds already in your policy... («it's your money») as well as the return on your real estate investment.

My returns would be lower than normal for this kind of deal, because I would owe interest on the borrowed money.

This is on top of the problem that when high - quality long interest rates are so low, it is typically a bad time to try to make money in financial assets, because returns on risky assets are typically only 0 - 2 % percent higher than the yield on long BBB / Baa debt over the long run.

They are winning because they get a very good return on their money, and you win because you get to avoid payday loans and credit cards at higher interest rates, and you also can agree to these deals at very short notice if required.

It's probably my favorite investment because you only need to put up 20 - 30 % of your own money, yet you get all of the returns and pay no taxes on capital gains.

Because reserve cash requires limited liquidity, it can be invested over a horizon of 6 — 12 months, thereby capturing incrementally higher yields and returns than money market funds, while taking on only slightly greater risk and keeping a focus on preservation of principal.

Obviously the best returns come in the latter situation but by focusing on expected returns, I have sometimes bought high P / E businesses too because even if there was a multiple contraction, there is good money to be made in a decade...

my bank sent my check back because my husband not on my account every year they took it, but my husband passed away last year and they put that on my return we filed jointly and now i guess we wait ive learned that if you call it will take longer so i guess i just wait, the only thing is i had to pay my friends back that helped me with both my husband and daughters funeral, both were sudden so i wait the good news my husband was a vietnam veteran and the VA will be giving me money back not all for his funeral he was service connect disability after he passed away agent orange exposer but they do give me a dic benefit which is tax exempt, so just sharing so your people know a couple of things thank you, question when they issue a check willit still have my husbands name on it even tho he passed away and yes it is on the irs paper work just wondering thank you blessings

The reason why it is good to be risky is because risky investments can result in higher returns on your money.

Today on Your Money, Your Wealth, he offers several reasons you may not be getting the returns you've enjoyed in the past, and he challenges Jason Zweig's assertion in the Wall St. Journal that it's because there are fewer stocks to choose from.

That's because you give up the enhanced returns you could get — on average — by selling the overvalued stock and putting the money in a stock that's undervalued and has better appreciation potential.

In other words, investors risk losing their money because of the uncertainty of a potential investment failure on the part of the borrower in exchange for receiving extra returns as a reward if the investment turns out to be profitable.

This is important because if you plan on getting a decent return from your money, the stocks should be trading at a consistent volume.

This is because your return on investment is measured by how much money you actually personally invest into the property.

For this reason, lenders will charge a higher interest rate for long - term loans because the guaranteed higher return on their money helps to shield them from the ups and downs of the market over a longer span of time.

As long as your investments yield a positive return, this will always be true because you're only taxed on the principal with a Roth (since it's after - tax money, you've already paid the tax before investing it) whereas you're taxed on withdrawals of principal and earnings when you withdraw from a 401 (k).