Back - tested, the LTVC produced a 10 - year annual return of 7.7 %, a healthy premium over the 4.9 % the S&P Global 1200
returned over the same period.
The horizontal axis measures the average monthly return net of the US
return over the same periods.
But when taken collectively, the portfolio of picks has an average absolute return of 135 %, which is double the 67 % the market
return over the same period.
With that in mind, it's imperative for United to maximise their points
return over the same period if they're to keep the title race alive.
How can I calculate the return on a series of stock positions with multiple uneven transactions that I can compare to the equivalent buy and hold
return over the same period?
The bottom 75 per cent of stocks actually posted a negative annual
return over the same period.
Returns for all portfolios in each quintile were then calculated, averaged over the 20 - year test period, and compared to the average
return over the same period for the overall universe.
For the ten years ended in June, the S&P / TSX Index compounded at 8 % per annum while the S&P 500 Index and the MSCI World Index both delivered negative
returns over the same period.
But when taken collectively, the portfolio of picks has an average absolute return of 135 %, which is double the 67 % the market
return over the same period.
If excluding dividends, then this 7.5 % annual return doubled the S&P 500
return over the same period.
My returns over the same period are: 2008 -29 % 2009 35.7 % 2010 12.8 % 2011 - 3.1 % 2012 15.5 % 2013 13.3 % 2014 3.9 % (YTD) For me however, investing for my pension income which I rely upon to pay the bills and put food on the table, the important consideration is not so much total return but maximum sustainable rising income.
In addition, while mid-caps had more risk than large - caps, investors have been rewarded with a higher
return over the same period.
Hence, will it not be a good idea to invest in Shares, FDs or Property, which can give better
returns over the same period.
However, because of the structure of these products, their rebalancing methodologies, and the math of compounding, extended holdings beyond one day or month, depending on the investment objective, can lead to results very different from a simple doubling, tripling, or inverse of the benchmark's average
return over the same period of time.
To turn in a negative
return over that same period of time is inexcuseable.
ie performing TWRR on the portfolio NAV will produce the same return when I sum each securities» geometric
return over the same period.
The Developed Ex US 1000 Index posted a 10 - year annualised return of 5.96 % compared to the 5.50 % return of MSCI EAFE Index, and the FTSE RAFI 1000 Index posted a 10 - year annualised return of 9.04 % compared to the S&P 500 Index
return over the same period of 7.89 %.
The fourth quarter was another satisfactory quarter for the Greenbackd Portfolio, up 14.3 % on an absolute basis, which was 9.8 % higher than the return on the S&P 500
return over the same period.
The absolute total return across the current and former positions as at January 5, 2009 is 14.2 %, which is 8.4 % higher than the S&P 500's
return over the same periods.
The absolute total return across the current and former positions as at February 28, 2009 was -3.7 %, which was +7.0 % higher than the S&P 500's
return over the same periods.
Not exact matches
In this case index funds, with their objective diversification, minimal management fees, instantaneous liquidity and flat
returns over the last decade have trounced venture with its negative
returns, narrow diversification, high management fees and illiquidity
over the
same time
period.
In 2017, the average
return is 2,908 %, according to Hedge Fund Research, compared with a 9 % gain for hedge funds
over the
same period.
Over the
same period, cobalt has
returned an incredible 112 percent.
Bitcoin alone, by comparison,
returned about 754 % (an 8.5-fold gain)
over the
same period.
Compare that to the GDM, which
returned negative 56 percent
over the
same period.
Over that
same period, the average
return for bonds was 4 %.
The stock market, on the other hand, has
returned an average of
over 10 % annually during the
same time
period.
For instance, a portfolio with an allocation of 49 % domestic stocks, 21 % international stocks, 25 % bonds, and 5 % short - term investments would have generated average annual
returns of almost 9 %
over the
same period, albeit with a narrower range of extremes on the high and low end.
But supposing we can count on annualized
returns around 8 % then my $ 100k diverted from a down payment and my presumed $ 1000 (delta between mortgage payment and rent) monthly savings could appreciate significantly
over the
same 10 year
period.
I repeated these steps for each stock's dividend adjusted
return over the
same time
period.
The following scatter plot relates monthly S&P 500 Index
return to
same - month change in NYSE margin debt
over the available sample
period.
For comparative purposes, the S&P 500 ® Index (the «S&P 500»), which is the Fund's benchmark and is considered to be reflective of the US securities markets, had a total
return of 23.63 %
over the
same time
period.
For comparative purposes, the S&P 500 ® Index, which is the Fund's benchmark, had a total
return of 3.27 %
over the
same time
period.
The Oakmark International Fund
returned 5 % for the quarter ended December 31, 2015, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which
returned 4 %
over the
same period.
October's list of 11 stocks is here and the screen
returned -2.53 %, out performing SPY which
returned -6.26 %
over the
same time
period.
As of this writing, the portfolio is down 2.11 % including dividends, compared to a positive
return of 11.63 % (excluding dividends) for SPY
over the
same period and 10.5 % for Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF (VBR)
over the
same time
period.
Most importantly, the Fund has
returned an average of 8.4 % per year since its inception in October 2006, outperforming the MSCI World Index's annualized gain of 5.0 %
over the
same period.
Yes, the average investor gained 5 % but the S&P 500
returned 12 %
over the
same period.
The Canadian gold mining companies, which account for a bit
over 5 % of the index, delivered a nearly 40 % total
return during the
same time
period.
A compilation of «self - managed» accounts
over the
same period showed a cumulative
return of 59.4 percent, losing to the market by 20 percent, and to the machines by almost 25 percent.
For reference,
over the
same period, the S&P only
returned 6.91 %.
The Fund has
returned an average of 2 % per year since its inception in October 2006, outperforming the MSCI World Index's annualized loss of 2 %
over the
same period.
It's true that, for example, if a dividend - paying company has 8 % growth and a 3 % yield while another company has 11 % growth
over the
same period, the
returns of the companies will be comparable.
By contrast, an investor who put $ 100,000 into a portfolio comprised of 60 % stocks and 40 % bonds and left it alone would now have $ 214,080, based on the total
returns of the S&P 500 and the Barclays bond index,
over the
same period.
The Fund has
returned an average of 10 % per year since its inception in September 1992, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which has averaged 6 % per year
over the
same period.
Most importantly, the Fund has
returned an average of 10 % per year since its inception in September 1992, outperforming the MSCI World ex U.S. Index, which has averaged 6 % per year
over the
same period.
These
returns compare to 5.39 % for taxable bond funds and 4.73 % for traditional fixed annuities
over the
same period.
More importantly, the Fund has
returned an average of 7 % per year since inception, outperforming the MSCI World Index, which has averaged 3 % per year
over the
same period.
But in early 2016 Wesfarmers had a great history of building wealth for shareholders — an investment in the company's shares in 2000
returned nearly 17 % per year while the Australian market, including dividends,
returned 8 % a year
over the
same period.
(
Over the
same period, remember, the S&P 500
returned 10.6 %.)