Sentences with phrase «returns than a buy»

In other words, using market timing over periods of at least 10 years to obtain better returns than a buy and hold strategy.

None of the variations tested produces higher absolute or risk - adjusted returns than buy and hold.

It simply says that a mechanical strategy of waiting for a crash on average resulted in much worse absolute and risk - adjusted returns than buying and holding.

Ten, fifteen, or twenty years after buying stocks when they were cheap generated substantially higher returns than buying stocks when they were expensive.

Even though taking no risk is completely valid (whatever lets you sleep at night), I prefer a moderate risk portfolio that targets higher returns than buy and hold with lower volatility and drawdowns — quite a tall order!

Every single covered call ETF listed in the US have similar or lower total returns than buy - and - hold and every single one of them have made distributions at the expense of future capital gains.

Not exact matches

A strategy that involves buying call options — contracts betting a stock will rise — around a company's analyst day has returned an average of 21 % since 2004, according to data from Goldman, which looked at more than 7,000 instances.

The appeal is that borrowing allows you to buy more securities than you'd otherwise be able to, magnifying your returns.

«This is significantly greater than the returns from buying options on all stocks broadly regardless of this signal,» said Fogertey.

More from The Verge: Bixby feels more like a return of the old Samsung than a path to the future You'll soon be able to use PayPal to fund Samsung Pay purchases Samsung expected to release coral blue S8 through Best Buy

Buying back stock is, for example, Warren Buffett's preferred way of returning cash to shareholders (rather than paying a dividend).

Be aware that more than likely, whatever you buy you won't be able to return.

Ohad Lederer, an analyst at Veritas Investment Research, calculates that investors buying condos to supply the rental market are accepting annual returns of less than 4 %.

While it's better to invest than keep money under a mattress, buying risk free securities, such as guaranteed income certificates or low - yielding government bonds, could actually be riskier than purchasing higher returning products, says Ted Rechtshaffen, president and CEO of Toronto's TriDelta Financial Partners.

It's going to take longer than that with equity crowdfunding simply because of the due diligence and information sharing that needs to occur when investors are buying a piece of a company and hoping to someday see a financial return.

LUSARDI: Question three has to do about risk diversification: «Do you think the following statement is true or false: buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.»

Personally, I'm more of a value investor and absolute return investor and will buy stocks that seem more likely than not to have a place in the portfolio.

However, if you actually did some research, purchased in a neighborhood that had a high potential for price increases, and bought intelligently, your returns are expected to be much higher than 0.2 %.

The following may be true of a potential takeover: • the company has fewer than 50 million shares outstanding; • management is dominated by persons near retirement age; • management's record on innovations and improving returns has been poor; • the company owns assets whose market values are potentially higher than those shown on the balance sheet; • outside investors have been steadily buying the stock.

It does this by using a derivative called a «swap» to earn the return of the index rather than buying the stocks directly.

«The one big thing that Bogle knows — and explains so well in this slender volume — is that buying and holding a broad benchmark of stocks while keeping fees to a minimum leads to higher long - term returns than constantly trading in a vain attempt to beat the market.

If the business earns 6 % on capital over 40 years and you hold it for 40 years, you're not going to do make much different than a 6 % return even if you buy it at a huge discount.

And if you can buy some business that earns high returns on equity and has even got mild growth prospects, you know, at much lower multiple earnings, you are going to do better than buying ten - year bonds at 2.30 or 30 - year bonds at three, or something of the sort.»

You have tricked / scammed millions of Americans into buying financial products that where ill suited for their need and that gave them lower returns than they could have gotten elsewhere.

Onceagain, most Blue Chip stocks will still have to be traded, not «buy and held» for much better than single digit returns in 2002.

If you buy stock in an overvalued company, your returns are likely to be less than the sum of dividend yield and dividend growth.

If, instead, you buy quality undervalued companies, your returns may be greater than the sum of dividend yield and dividend growth.

The 10 month moving average system lowered the volatility of the portfolio to 7.1 % and drawdown to 7.1 % but had slightly lower overall returns than simply buying and holding the portfolio.

If, for example, a given individual security in a market is offering a more attractive risk - adjusted future return than all of the other securities, and if investors know this, then they will try to buy that security, selling the others as necessary to raise funds.

In other words, the individual stocks, bonds, and funds you choose or when you buy or sell is less important to your ultimate return than the percent allocated to various asset classes.

In this 2014 article we showed that better returns than those from the ETF could be obtained by applying a ranking system to the stock holding of USMV (the universe), and investing periodically only in the 12 highest ranked stocks, bought and sold according to certain rules.

If there is a parallel to draw between the 2017 Bitcoin boom and the 1637 tulip craze, it is that the vast majority of people purchasing bitcoins in December have been buying (and selling) a store of value perceived to offer better (worse) returns than the alternatives on offer.

«The choice of rebalancing as an investment discipline as compared with an alternative such as buy - and - hold is simply a risk - return trade - off — though one that is a little more subtle than most.

Since the industry consolidated and management incentives changed to being based on returns on capital rather than growth, capacity (supply) growth has tracked GDP (demand) growth closely, free cash flow generation has been significant and consistent, and the companies have consistently paid down debt, bought back stock and paid dividends.

In other words, most investors in actively managed mutual funds with «professional money managers» (who regularly bought and sold stocks) had worse returns than investors who stuck with unmanaged index funds.

As I said earlier many times that Owners are very happy with returns they are earning from Arsenal... Unless and until their IRR or Return is getting lower than expected rate of return he won't make any investments in transfer market... The point which you are referring here about Man Utd is bit different about Buying Pogba or MatReturn is getting lower than expected rate of return he won't make any investments in transfer market... The point which you are referring here about Man Utd is bit different about Buying Pogba or Matreturn he won't make any investments in transfer market... The point which you are referring here about Man Utd is bit different about Buying Pogba or Matic....

i like the boy, besides, we will sell him on the future for a lot of money... its better business that buying turan for example, who is 30 yo, and we will get nothin in return... but better than sanches?

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

we have no chance of signing benatia i recently read an article where bayern said they wouldn, t sell him and even if they did benatia said he wouldn, t be against a return to roma for whom he played for, also bayern turned down an offer from juventus to sign benatia first on a season loan (2millions) with a view to buy him, a similar deal to the one they have with kingsley coman between the 2 clubs also juventus have a very good relationship with bayern because of the sale of vidal and loan of coman which put them in a better position than us!!

But rather than buying young or developing any kind of team - wide identity — with Vincenzo Montella, they're on their sixth manager in three years — they would often pay for players with recognizable names — Carlos Bacca, Luiz Adriano, Torres, Michael Essien, the return of Kaká — that no one else wanted anymore.

The Bundesliga Champions wanted to trigger a buy - back clause which would come into play this summer (2015), but rather than spending another year at Leverkusen before returning to Bayern, Can opted to sign for Liverpool.

The only thing worse than buying all those useless presents was pretending to enjoy receiving useless presents in return.

Our only disappointment was that when Sydney and Hannah tried to spend their hard earned KidZos at the end their was nothing decent for them to buy in the shop, which upset them a little as they'd worked so hard thinking they'd be able to buy something good, so I'd recommend spending KidZos on experiences (as Zak did) rather than saving them, unless you plan to make a return trip.

RETURNING = Use this code if you'd ordered from us more than once (please note, we will verify buying history).

If you are not completely satisfied with your purchase, you can return the products you have bought on our website no later than 20 business days after the shipping.

I bought the Sony a6500 and the 16 - 70 f4 lens last week and am having to return it today as it's taking worse photos than my iphone!!

More often than not, you will want to buy an item in a couple of sizes to check the best fit and then return the other.

(Much better than LOFT's standard $ 125 minimum for free shipping, which just means I buy extra sizes and «ride - along items» to return later.)

Buy velvet blazers or trousers for that upcoming event well in advance so you can try it on and return if it's a size smaller or larger than what you need and still not miss the event.

At more than two weeks into 2018, you may be running close to the deadline to return party outfit duds, the just - because gifts to yourself, and splurge items you bought in a holiday fugue state.