Sentences with phrase «returns than most investors»

By holding a low - expense index funds, you'll capture a larger share of market returns than most investors, who incur higher costs on average.

By contrast, someone who generates a better return than most investors, gets a compounded, multiplicative effect.

Not exact matches

Most investors shy away from bonds because they yield (or return) less than equities and tend to be more complex in nature.

Three of our 2016 picks returned better than 40 %, and two of those three reaped most of their gains over spans of just a few weeks — Virgin America, when it announced that it was negotiating with a buyer and then closed a deal; and Wynn Resorts, after a better - than - expected earnings report lured investors back to the stock.

Today's suburban markets primarily favor long - term investors seeking steady returns rather than those wanting quick cashouts, most analysts say.

I have to imagine that for most investors their overall stock returns will be greater sticking with dividend stocks than chasing those elusive multi-baggers.

Most investors believe their returns are much better than they are, because their record keeping is poor.

For now it's best to assume, while it won't give you outstanding returns, you'll lose less than most other professional investors during the long run.

In other words, most investors in actively managed mutual funds with «professional money managers» (who regularly bought and sold stocks) had worse returns than investors who stuck with unmanaged index funds.

Michael Burry was most famous as the investment manager behind Scion Capital LLC, a hedge fund that operated during the period of 2000 - 2008 and generated tremendous returns for their investors (more than 400 % over 8 years).

This indicates that in most analysis sub-periods, investors would be better off by sticking to the reference ETF portfolio rather than adjusting the positions to match the fund's returns.

But if you're a passive investor, it's important to understand this performance simply reflects that we've enjoyed a five - year bull market in stocks — not to mention five years of bond returns that were higher than most people expected.

As DALBAR studies have shown for more than three decades, most investors don't even achieve 50 % of the returns of the market, much less beat the market.

Research has shown that most passive investors tend to achieve higher returns in the long run than most active investors after considering taxes and fees.

However, we feel it is more realistic than most industry benchmarks which do not accurately represent the average investor's returns.

In addition, Howard Marks teach us that value investors believe high returns and low risk is achieved simultaneously by acquiring assets for less than their worth (read The Most Important Thing).

The TAVF approach is the same as that followed by private companies not seeking access to public markets for equities; businessmen seeking favorable tax attributes so that they can create wealth on a tax - sheltered basis; most creditors; and all investors who seek in the management of their own portfolios to maximize total return, rather than just invest for interest income and dividend income.

Many investors also don't understand that most portfolios are far more weighted for returns than downside loss protection.

Most mainstream options with an investment advisor would involve mutual funds and if you're going to be a conservative investor, mutual fund fees of 2 - 2.5 % may be too high a threshold to exceed to earn a significantly better rate of return than GICs.

In fact, to put a fine point on it, we think most investors are more likely to hurt their long - term returns than help them by trying to time the market in any additional way.

In practice most investors considering screening are looking for marginally better returns than a passive large - cap index fund.

Dr Blitzer, Please clarify in details, are most active mutual funds wrongfully & intentionally comparing their fund's return to SP500 rather than S&P 500 Total Return (^ SPXTR), to look better to invereturn to SP500 rather than S&P 500 Total Return (^ SPXTR), to look better to inveReturn (^ SPXTR), to look better to investors?

PEG ratios work for core and growth investors, but the PEG ratio hurdles needed for investment are lower than most investors think, so long as the expected rate of return (discount rate) is high.

Most of the investors look at nominal returns rather than real returns.

Most providers have engaged in behaviour that does more to fatten their bottom line than improve investor experience and returns.

The interviewee Gus Saunter, in the first few minutes of the interview, explains in layman's terms why most investors can not get returns better than the market returns, especially after costs.

As stock investing generally requires a very detailed market study and is a very volatile investment in terms of return of investment, investors, especially the new investors out there are now turning to investing in bonds, as bond investments are safer than most of the other forms of investments and you need not constantly worry about prices going high or low.

The bad news doesn't end there: Most investors in those top 20 funds fared even worse than the funds» returns would suggest.

We have found that most investors have quite exaggerated views about long term stock market returns, mainly believing they are much more erratic than they are.

Financial economists such as World Pensions Council (WPC) researchers have argued that durably low interest rates in most G20 countries will have an adverse impact on the funding positions of pension funds as «without returns that outstrip inflation, pension investors face the real value of their savings declining rather than ratcheting up over the next few years» [19]

Plus most investors tend to compare investment performance vs. price indices, rather than total return indices — another good reason for this approach.]

We believe commodity - linked real assets look the most attractive after shrugging off the negative momentum of the last few years, but investors should keep in mind that these exposures tend to exhibit higher levels of volatility than TIPS or municipal real return bonds.

There are various estimates around this but most credible estimates indicate that dividends generate more than half of an investor's long term return.

Most investors are willing to pay these fees because they expect the hedge fund manager to generate excess returns that will more than make up for their fees.

As for dividends: I prefer to compare my performance to price (rather than total return) indices, since that's what most investors focus on primarily, so it's only fair I exclude dividends too.

Because Conservative investors are still «investing,» they should have a higher return over most rolling three - year periods than investing 100 % in money market funds, fixed annuities, CDs, and other bank instruments.

Forecasting what may most likely happen with these factors over time (given the assumed fluctuations in the markets - which you can control every year by using different rates of return on every investment for every year - including negative rates of return, and being able to change your income goal every year) is much more important to model, than a one - dimensional probability number, to an actual investor's life.

• Most investment managers» models do not account for past trades, so the actual returns investors» realize are usually 10 % to 30 % less than what's advertised via their hypothetical returns.

Now if you are an active investor than paying double for a term policy won't make sense to you since you most likely can use the difference to get returns which will be greater than the money you will receive at the end of the term.

Bitcoin has returned more than 1,000 percent this year so far, but most investors are still cautious, seeing it as an instrument of speculation.

It's important for us as an industry to educate sellers on the risk in selling directly to institutional investors, rather than exposing their home to the market in order to get the most return on it.

Entry price is higher though and you have to be an accredited investor for most funds but you can get higher than stock market returns in a passive manner.

That means that investors today are expecting most of their returns to come from cash flow rather than appreciation, Bach says.

I was acquainted with a few investors in the area that are making great returns consistently in smaller less developed parts, such as Homestead; however be weary of parts Miami as its heading towards becoming a crowded rental market, especially in the Downtown / Brickell areas and the bubble will burst faster than most investors expect.

To take the extreme case, it's very rare for the Baa - rated corporate bond yield to be less than the average REIT dividend yield: that has happened only at times when investors were most dramatically avoiding REITs, most recently in March 2009 at the lowest point of the Great Financial Crisis — and in the 12 months following that episode, those investors who bucked the market and bought into REITs were rewarded with total returns that exceeded 100 percent.