Sentences with phrase «revealed main effects»

Our findings revealed main effects for adolescent age (F = 7.299, df = 1, p <.01) and family income (F = 3.36, df = 3, p <.01) on adolescents» views of their parents» monitoring.

Results from semi-structured interviews about their worst current stressors revealed main effects for some coping types as assessed with investigator - rated indices, whereas no main effects were observed with self - report coping indices.

Analyses did not reveal any main effect of attachment on child's adjustment, but the moderating effect of attachment on the association between contextual risk and adjustment was significant.

Not exact matches

Indeed, it is striking that the same critical tests which, when applied to the birth stories, reveal so large an element of legend, have the effect, rather, of establishing the validity of the Gospel record when they are applied to the main body of the tradition, the Synoptic account of Jesus» public career.

«A review of the literature exploring the effects of climate change on biodiversity has revealed a gap in what may be the main challenge to the world's fauna and flora,» said the senior author Dr. James Watson, Climate Change Program Director and a Principle Research Fellow at the University of Queensland.

«Study of 50,000 Female Online Daters Reveals the Demi Moore Effect Main Lavalife Celebrates 20th Anniversary»

«PARSHIP.ie Bringing Depth to Irish Internet Dating Main Study of 50,000 Female Online Daters Reveals the Demi Moore Effect»

Results (Table S5) revealed a significant main effect of Maternal behavior (Wald = 12.98, P < 0.001): Puppies raised by mothers exhibiting more maternal behavior were more likely to be released from the program (OR = 3.39).

Mass Effect fans were finally treated with a full cinematic trailer revealing the main characters, a brother and sister duo, as well as the reason why we are traveling to this new frontier.

In addition, a main effect of political self - identification emerged (F (3, 2253) = 121.89, p <.001), and post-hoc contrasts revealed that Democrats reported significantly greater belief (M = 5.94, SD = 1.37) than all other groups, whereas Republicans (M = 4.29, SD = 1.93) reported significantly less belief than all other groups (ps <.001, Bonferonni correction for multiple comparisons); Independents and Others fell in between (M = 5.18, SD = 1.81 and M = 5.27, SD = 1.72, respectively).

A 2 (framing: loss vs. foregone - gain) × 2 (social norm: no - norm vs. with - norm) ANOVA performed on the data revealed a significant main effect of framing, F (1,1196) = 6.438, p =.011, r =.073, with larger emission cuts in the foregone - gain than the loss condition, a significant main effect of social norm, F (1,1196) = 13.904, p <.001, r =.107, with larger emission cuts in the with - norm than the no - norm condition, together with a significant interaction, F (1,1196) = 4.363, p =.037.

For hyperactivity / inattention measured with ASRS, the test of pairwise comparisons did not reveal any differences between groups (all p > 0.05), although the ANOVA did show a main effect (p = 0.032) and the never poor group had the lowest mean score.

The results of the statistical models revealed that DRD2 and DRD4 did not have consistent main effects on antisocial phenotypes.

The results of their study revealed that DRD2 had a statistically significant main effect on impulsivity, but DRD4 did not.

In the vmPFC, left NAcc, left pallidum, right insula, right pallidum, and right planum polare, main effects of EFT revealed general decreases from pre - to post - therapy in threat activation, regardless of whose hand was held, all Fs (1, 41.1 to 58.6) ≥ 3.9, all ps ≤.05.

Analysis of effects of non-maternal care, a special focus of the NICHD study, confirmed the lack of main effects of children's age of entry, quality of care and length of time children spent in non-maternal care, but also revealed interaction effects.

Statistical analysis revealed significant main effects of gender (F1, 227 = 36.77, P < 0.0001) and ETLE (F1, 227 = 27.50, P < 0.0001), but no main effect of MAOA genotype (F1, 227 = 0.10, P = 0.75).

Consistent with the developmental literature, main effects revealed that older adolescents and females reported more symptoms of depression than did younger adolescents and males.

A 2 (secure / neutral prime) × 2 (positive / negative face) × 2 (high / low anxiety) repeated - measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of target valence [F (1,37) = 9.376, p < 0.01] as well as a significant prime type and target valence interaction [F (1,37) = 6.071, p < 0.05].

Additionally follow - up univariate ANOVAS (see Table 3) revealed a significant main effect of gender on relative duration (F (1, 58) = 8.41, p ≤ 0.05) and frequency (F (1, 58) = 11.77, p ≤ 0.05) of problem focused stress communication.

The interaction analysis with trust and relationship quality confirms the results of the main effects: Whereas trust revealed hardly detectable influences on peer clustering in smoking, relationship quality was more clearly associated.

Network density did not reveal significant main effects on males» or females» smoking behavior.