The Internet's big names battle to salvage their reputations after recent
revelations about the National Security Agency (the story is better when told through these classic children's books).
Not exact matches
The development could bring an abrupt end to the high - stakes legal showdown which has become a lightning rod for a broader debate on data privacy in the United States, which was inflamed by
revelations in 2013 from former
National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden
about the U.S. government's massive surveillance programs.
In the week following former
national security adviser Michael Flynn's guilty plea, new details have emerged
about the meeting President Donald Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr., attended in July 2016 with a Russian lawyer who offered him «dirt» on Hillary Clinton, among other
revelations.
2 These workshops took place in early 2013, prior to the
revelations by former U.S.
National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden
about the agency's cyberespionage activities.
Rifkind's committee faces question - marks over its handling of the
revelations about the US
National Security Agency's Prism programme and its cooperation with the British eavesdropping service GCHQ.
After Edward Snowden's
revelations about GCHQ's role in mass personal data harvesting alongside the US
National Security Agency, sceptics may be inclined to take such guidance with a pinch of salt.
Furthermore, the Common Core assessments emerged onto the public agenda in the wake of
revelations of widespread privacy violations by the
National Security Agency, playing into heightened fears
about data mining.
In other words, granting Binyam Mohamed and his four co-defendants their day in court might result in official confirmation, or new
revelations, of the CIA's relationship with Jeppesen; of the cooperation and complicity of foreign governments in rendition and torture;
about the Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation program in general; and
about the CIA's practices and methods — all matters which, our government insists and the narrowest of majorities of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agrees, «in the interests of
national security should not be divulged.»
We have become almost immune to new
revelations about the warrantless seizure of communications data by the United States
National Security Agency and Government Communications Headquarters in Britain while little is known
about Communications
Security Establishment in Canada.