Sentences with phrase «revenue at district schools»

The net impact on taxpayers, then, is 1) the savings that come from the difference between the voucher and the per - pupil revenue at district schools, for those who would have attended them in the absence of the voucher program, minus 2) the voucher costs for students who would have attended private schools anyway.

Not exact matches

But perhaps anticipating these concerns, Adamick offers this disclaimer right at the outset of Lunch Money: «While not all of the tricks and tools presented here will apply to all school districts, every district should be able to identify at least one strategy to increase the revenue, or decrease the expenses, of its own school food services department.»

There is an obvious disparity between the funds made available by the federal government to support free meals for low - income students and the revenue collected by school districts (from federal «paid» meal reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same meals when served to children at higher income levels.

(By way of reminder, «competitive» foods are those foods sold on school campuses outside of the scope of the federal meal program, such as «a la carte» foods sold in the cafeteria or vending machines by a district to raise revenues, as well as foods sold at sporting events, team and PTO / PTA fundraisers, etc..)

TLT: My school district, like most, supplements the revenue it gets from the National School Lunch Program by selling «a la carte» foods like chips and ice cream at full price toschool district, like most, supplements the revenue it gets from the National School Lunch Program by selling «a la carte» foods like chips and ice cream at full price toSchool Lunch Program by selling «a la carte» foods like chips and ice cream at full price to kids.

Cuomo's Five - Year Financial Plan keeps revenue sharing with local governments flat at a time when scores of local governments and school districts are headed for insolvency and a takeover by state Control Boards.

As the Syracuse City School District goes into its budget process, it's looking at a $ 24 million spending gap, a revenue problem stemming from years of stagnant state aid in the face of rising educational costs.

The proposal was included in the Governor's broader plan to use the state's lottery - revenue jackpot — estimated at $ 745 million this year — to raise school districts» budgets by 10 percent and provide teachers with a 5 - percent salary increase.

In Houston, where 46 of Texas's 219 charter schools are located, the district estimated recently that it will lose about 13,000 students to charters during this school year (up from 12,000 the previous year) at a cost of $ 53.5 million in state revenues.

Second, suppose the amount of the voucher is identical to the revenues per pupil at the district school.

Public revenue for charter schools is typically 10 to 20 percent below per - pupil funding levels at neighboring district - run schools.

In Philadelphia, for example, revenue per pupil (in constant dollars) dropped from more than $ 15,400 at the height of the stimulus package to just $ 13,660 in 2013, a free fall of 12 percent, which forced deficit financing, personnel cuts, and shortened school years (see «The Philadelphia School District's Ongoing Financial Crisis,» features, Fall school years (see «The Philadelphia School District's Ongoing Financial Crisis,» features, Fall School District's Ongoing Financial Crisis,» features, Fall 2014).

First, the dynamics of public funding and the budgeting process encourage school districts to spend their entire funding allocation, creating a cost structure that is difficult to adjust down when revenue drops or fails to grow at an expected rate.

Find detailed reports on school district revenues and expenditures for the 2016 - 17 year in the Financial Data tab at the district and state level.

A recruitment process for new teachers that is much less effective than it might be does not result in the school district losing students or revenue, at least not within a time span or through a series of events that would make the connection discernible.

Riding on such claims, EVAAS backers continue to sell their SAS ® EVAAS ® model to states (e.g., Tennessee, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania) and school districts (e.g., the Houston Independent School District), at a significant amount (as in millions) of taxpayers» revschool districts (e.g., the Houston Independent School District), at a significant amount (as in millions) of taxpayers» revSchool District), at a significant amount (as in millions) of taxpayers» revenues.

For many years, unfunded mandates coupled with legislation including Act 388 have placed increased financial burdens on county governments and school districts throughout our state, putting county governments at odds with local school districts as to which entity is most entitled to state and locally generated revenues.

In general, unless otherwise exempt, the following three criteria must be met in order for non-classroom based charters to be guaranteed full funding levels: (1) at least 80 percent of total revenues must be spent on instruction or classroom support, (2) at least 50 percent of public revenues must be spent on certificated staff salaries and benefits, and (3) the pupil - teacher ratio must be equal to or lower than the pupil - teacher ratio in the largest unified school district in the county or counties in which the school operates or the school must maintain a minimum of 25:1 ratio.

They have already voted no to across the board teacher salary increases and continued the freeze on teachers» salaries that has been in place for 5 years (at the same time passed a tax break for the wealthy, and now, with reduced revenue can not give raises), increased class size, taken away additional pay for Masters degrees, eliminated most of the state's teacher assistants, gone after tenure and offered the top 25 % of the teachers in a district $ 500 to give up their tenure immediately, increased the number of charter schools (many funded by Republicans in the private school business) and finally, the most recent scheme pondered is to let kids go to any school in the state regardless of their home county.

Wealthy districts» ability to raise more revenue at comparable or even lower tax rates has two impacts — wealthy districts are able to outspend poorer districts with comparable or lower tax rates, and homes of similar values are taxed at a higher rate in poorer school districts.

Help School Districts by Letting Them Raise Their Own Tax Revenue Gov. Jerry Brown wants to help inner - city schools at the expense of suburbanites.

Funding for the School Facilities Program is virtually gone and there is a backlog in applications for state assistance... while the state's growing debt service is of concern, it is unclear whether local districts have the capacity to generate sufficient revenue at the local level to meet their specific facility needs.

In fact, nearly every state has seen at least one suit in which plaintiffs, often representing cash - strapped urban districts, argue that their schools» reliance on property tax revenue is unfair and inadequate.

The union's study included the cost of the office space that the Charter Schools Division occupies in the district's headquarters at the Beaudry building as a cost that the revenue from oversight fees does not cover.

(hh) If the unencumbered amount of cumulative surplus revenue from tuition held by a charter school at the end of a fiscal year, less (i) the amount of the fourth quarter tuition payment, (ii) the amount held in reserve for the purchase or renovation of an academic facility pursuant to a capital plan, and (iii) any reserve funds held as security for bank loans, exceeds 20 per cent of its operating budget and its budgeted capital costs for the succeeding fiscal year as is reported in a capital plan to be submitted in the school's most recent annual report, the amount in excess of said 20 per cent shall be returned by the charter school to the sending district or districts and the state in proportion to their share of tuition paid during the fiscal year.

School districts serving communities where property is worth less simply can not generate the same level of revenue at the same tax rate as wealthier communities.

To address these inequities and sometimes at the behest of the courts, many state school finance formulas allocate state revenues in a way that compensates for variation in local revenues among districts.

Daily outbound calls to customers at the school district management level with my territory to identify revenue generating opportunities

Worked with School Districts in AZ to collect on time the revenues and submitted State reporting at the end of the schoolSchool Districts in AZ to collect on time the revenues and submitted State reporting at the end of the schoolschool year.