Sentences with phrase «revenues per pupil»

State and local revenues per pupil fell in real terms in 39 states.

Balancing all these factors leads to the projections in Figure 5, which provide a bounded estimate of national total operating revenues per pupil through 2020.

Second, suppose the amount of the voucher is identical to the revenues per pupil at the district school.

Since then, as MPCP enrollments have grown and as the gap has widened between the voucher and MPS revenues per pupil, the benefit has grown from $ 7.3 million to $ 31.9 million in 2008.

In this view, it would be justified to maintain total revenues, despite falling enrollments, for a higher revenue per pupil.

In Philadelphia, for example, revenue per pupil (in constant dollars) dropped from more than $ 15,400 at the height of the stimulus package to just $ 13,660 in 2013, a free fall of 12 percent, which forced deficit financing, personnel cuts, and shortened school years (see «The Philadelphia School District's Ongoing Financial Crisis,» features, Fall 2014).

While this is an oversimplification, the Department's proposed rule would require districts to spend roughly equal amounts of state and local revenue per pupil in Title I and non-Title I schools.

Data collected by the United States Census Bureau show DCPS as having by far the highest revenue per pupil in the country when compared to statewide averages at $ 29,427.

Many of the disparities were attributable to vast differences in the amount and value of taxable property within school systems, which ranged from a few hundred dollars to millions of dollars in taxable revenue per pupil.

When the LCFF is fully implemented many schools and districts will receive 50 to 75 percent more revenue per pupil than they do now.

As a public school, charter schools receive revenue per pupil according to state guidelines.

Average revenue per pupil in elementary and secondary schools in the United States amounts to roughly $ 13,000 a year.

Texas Education Agency (TEA) data indicates that charter schools receive approximately $ 1200 less in total revenue per pupil than traditional public schools.

State funds received based on the average daily attendance of students, resulting in $ 1200 less in total revenue per pupil than traditional public schools

Not exact matches

In most cases, tax revenues pay the costs at private schools up to the expenditures per pupil in government - operated schools.

While per pupil revenue covers the majority of our expenses related to delivery of the academic program, additional money must be raised to provide the support services needed to effectively serve pregnant and parenting teens and their children.

The resulting «funding gap» is the difference between per - pupil revenues in poor and rich districts.

Districts, of course, can also seek operating levies from local taxpayers to boost revenues beyond what the state affords them, while charters depend entirely on state and federal per - pupil allocations and whatever they can raise from philanthropy (see Figure 1 for current spending estimates).

The revenue generated from that deduction is reallocated to districts with below - average per - pupil spending and property values.

Districts that can generate more than the foundation level in local revenue are not eligible for foundation aid, but still receive at least $ 375 per pupil from a constitutionally dedicated fund.

If a district has «negative aid» in Wisconsin's third tier of funding, it must share some of its local revenue with districts whose per - pupil property values are lower than the state average.

Second, though states have shouldered some responsibility for financing public education, usually by decreeing a minimum or «foundation» level of per - pupil spending, sizable portions of education revenue are locally generated through property taxes, bond levies, and such.

Finally, when schools do locate a facility, upfront costs can be prohibitive for schools that do not have the per - pupil revenue base or donor support to finance renovations.

If a district's per - pupil adjusted property wealth is greater than $ 305,000, it must do one of the following: consolidate with another district, share revenue with another district, return revenue to the state, educate students from another district, or consolidate its tax base with another district's.

As a result, MPS was no longer able to maintain total revenues as it lost MPCP students, but could still maintain per - pupil revenues.

The net impact on taxpayers, then, is 1) the savings that come from the difference between the voucher and the per - pupil revenue at district schools, for those who would have attended them in the absence of the voucher program, minus 2) the voucher costs for students who would have attended private schools anyway.

Students in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public schools (TPS) in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S in Fiscal Year 2014.

The diversion of voucher funds from the district to the voucher school would leave per - pupil revenues unchanged and would also have no net impact on taxpayers.

The total revenue each district is allowed to raise from property taxes and general state aid is simply that per - pupil amount, multiplied by enrollment (smoothed by three - year averaging).

But MPS chose to maintain total revenues, collecting $ 39.5 million more than would have been needed to maintain the per - pupil amount.

Average per - pupil public revenues (from all sources, including federal Charter School Program start - up grants) across the NewSchools portfolio were more than $ 11,500 in 2010, ranging from about $ 9,000 to $ 16,000, depending on the states and cities where schools are located.

As a benchmark case, consider a hypothetical voucher program that has no net impact on taxpayers or on per - pupil district revenues.

The calculations are based on 18,500 enrollees in MPCP, a voucher amount of $ 6,501, and MPS revenue limit per pupil of $ 9,141.

The amount of the voucher is less than the per - pupil revenues allocated to MPS, which implies a savings for taxpayers, just as voucher supporters claim.

However, vestiges of the original funding mechanism meant that Milwaukee property taxes had to go up just to maintain per - pupil revenues.

In addition, the nature of the impact was left up to Milwaukee: it could choose to let the voucher money follow the child, accepting a net reduction in total (but not per - pupil) MPS revenues.

The revenue limit formula, underlying Figure 2, takes each district's per - pupil revenues from the prior year and tacks on a legislatively determined annual increment.

Traditional public schools received $ 7,000 more per pupil in local revenues, on average, than did public charter schools.

MPCP's impact on taxpayers can be readily calculated from the gap between the voucher and per - pupil MPS revenues, under any given assumption regarding the percentage of voucher users who would have otherwise attended private school.

The dotted bars in the positive region for this period represent the impact on MPS of the rise in per - pupil revenues.

Figure 2 depicts the per - pupil revenue limit for MPS, which rose from $ 5,804 in 1994 (the year Wisconsin established revenue limits) to $ 9,141 in 2008.

Typically, these surpluses are used to build operating reserves of about 5 percent of a school's yearly budget, to insure against normal cash - flow needs, temporary revenue interruptions, or fluctuations in annual per - pupil funding levels.

Public revenue for charter schools is typically 10 to 20 percent below per - pupil funding levels at neighboring district - run schools.

These higher property taxes no longer pay for the option of maintaining total revenues as enrollments decline; instead, they are necessary to maintain per - pupil revenues.

The dramatic escalation of the federal government's revenue contribution, to close to 15 percent of education's national total, almost guarantees that mean per - pupil revenues will not decline in 2010.

Still, per - pupil revenues will likely continue their historical upward trajectory.

The $ 37 billion in the stimulus package that is intended to offset reduced state and local education revenue in 2009 will cushion what would otherwise likely have been the first significant per - pupil spending reduction in 60 years.

There have been 11 periods during which GDP declined but mean total real per - pupil revenues still increased.

A study released Aug. 24 by the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation shows significant differences in per - pupil revenues available to regular public and charter schools.

It's hard to find many «good» charter sectors making do with less than, say, $ 7,500 in per - pupil revenue.