Sentences with phrase «revenues per student»

While nationally property taxes represent 62 percent of all local revenue, they constitute 80 percent of the inequality in local revenues per student.
While the average district in the state saw its local revenue per student increase during this period, Reading's decreased (see Figure 1).
But Chingos points out that K12 schools receive an average of $ 7,393 in public revenue per student, 37 percent less than the district school average of $ 11,708.
In 2015, the median revenue per student that public colleges and universities collected was $ 19,053, which includes all sources of revenue (e.g., tuition, research funding, state appropriations, etc.).
Charters frequently begin with less revenue per student and then must spend significant portions of those funds on transportation and facilities — necessary functions for which traditional district schools often receive separate funding allocations.
Negotiated financial aid offers to ensure both satisfaction of prospective families and minimum revenue per student for Blackburn

Not exact matches

Its biggest source of revenue is a series of 8 - week long courses that costs $ 285 per person, with roughly 1,000 students enrolled at a time.
It plans to devote 10 per cent of its revenues to organize workplaces and add new members, while also hammering out a mechanism that will allow students, retirees, the unemployed and others to join — something «that's never been tried before,» said Coles.
Within this financially constrained world there is nonetheless a striking variation of revenue and expenditure per student from one denomination to another.
[9] Theological schools accredited in the United States by the ATS in 1988 - 89 averaged expenses of $ 15,226 per FTE student out of average revenues of $ 15,560 per student.
In the same period Roman Catholic theological schools reported average revenues of $ 9,137 and average expenditures of $ 8,613 per student; nondenominational and interdenominational schools reported average revenues of $ 5,664 and expenditures of $ 5,673 per student.
In 1987, the last year for which these figures are available, the continuum ranged from revenues of $ 15,727 and expenditures of $ 14,501 per student in schools affiliated with the Protestant Episcopal Church to revenues of $ 3,950 and expenditures of $ 3,536 per student in schools affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention.
Education spending had peaked at an average of $ 11,621 per student in 2008 — 09 before the deep global recession caused states to slash their spending amid plummeting tax revenues.
Charging motorists $ 2 dollar per crossing would generate $ 525 million of revenue each year, Espada said, and «directly pay for the free students MetroCards» the MTA is threatening to abolish.
As Table 1 illustrates, insofar as state and local revenues are generated on a per - student basis, the school district will receive roughly $ 2.1 million in additional revenues for the new students.
If a district's per - pupil adjusted property wealth is greater than $ 305,000, it must do one of the following: consolidate with another district, share revenue with another district, return revenue to the state, educate students from another district, or consolidate its tax base with another district's.
When students leave a district to attend a charter school, the district may see an increase in per - student revenues.
As a result, MPS was no longer able to maintain total revenues as it lost MPCP students, but could still maintain per - pupil revenues.
The net impact on taxpayers, then, is 1) the savings that come from the difference between the voucher and the per - pupil revenue at district schools, for those who would have attended them in the absence of the voucher program, minus 2) the voucher costs for students who would have attended private schools anyway.
Students in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public schools (TPS) in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S in Fiscal YeStudents in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public schools (TPS) in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S in Fiscal Yestudents in traditional public schools (TPS) in 14 major metropolitan areas across the U. S in Fiscal Year 2014.
Houston's charter schools were funded just 2 % below their TPS, and earned the only grade of A in the study, in part because they were able to raise almost $ 900 per student in nonpublic revenue.
And while revenue from both state and federal sources increased at about the same rate as that of districts throughout the state, Reading averaged almost a thousand dollars more per student from outside sources than the state average (see Figure 2).
The Ministry of Finance calculated free tuition for all students would cost 2.1 trillion Chilean pesos, or $ 3.14 billion per year, an amount deemed unattainable given the level of economic growth and tax revenue at the time.
Walker's plan called for a cut of 5.5 percent to revenue limits in education, effectively dropping the state's per - student funding by $ 550.
Students in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public Students in public charter schools receive $ 5,721 or 29 % less in average per - pupil revenue than students in traditional public students in traditional public schools.
[5] Pham Thu, «A Look at DC Public Charter School Finances: Revenue and Spending Per Student,» DC Fiscal Policy Institute, August 5, 2015, http://www.dcfpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/8.5.15-Revenue-and-Spending-Per-Student-TP-Final.pdf (accessed January 14, 2016).
[11] The Education Finance Incentive Grants also take into account the amount of state revenue dedicated to education relative to per capita income, as well as per - pupil spending and the percentage of students in poverty.
And Figure 5 shows that resources per full - time equivalent student (including both government funding and tuition revenue) has increased by nearly 50 percent since reaching a historical low in 1999 (just after the reform, when most students were still grandfathered under the old system).
Nearly all funding for schools is on a per - pupil basis, which encourages schools to work hard to keep their students and their revenues.
I seriously doubt LAUSD restricts its site expenditures to revenue limit sources since that revenue limit amount is less than some schools actually get in per student costs (though for other schools its greater than that amount).
Between 2012 and 2014, the revenues of Seattle's PTAs increased from approximately $ 340 to $ 370 per student, remaining relatively steady at around 0.35 percent of median household income for families with children.
During the same time period, Portland's PTA revenues increased from approximately $ 130 to $ 140 per student, remaining around 0.18 percent of median household income for families with children.
When excluding the last one and only including revenue limits and other local revenue, the gap is closer to $ 1500 per student.
The 2015 - 17 state budget allowed school districts to increase revenues — state aid and property taxes — for students attending private voucher schools, typically about $ 10,000 per pupil.
The districts most adversely affected by deferrals included districts in San Bernardino County and Ravenswood School District in East Palo Alto, which had the least property wealth per student and therefore relied on state revenue for most of their school funding.
Nygren's plan would allow school districts with the low - revenue caps to increase the amount they spend from the current $ 9,100 per student limit to $ 9,400 per student next school year.
The governor is still expressing confidence that his school funding plan will clear the Legislature, increasing per pupil funding for public schools — but outside of the revenue caps and less than what voucher students will receive.
Five districts have revenue over $ 10,000 per student.
Five districts have local revenue under $ 2,000 per student.
Under current law, school districts can continue to receive funding for students they no longer educate if they choose to go to a private school with a voucher, meaning that a student leaving actually increases the district's per - student revenue in the short term.
His proposal, based on revenue from the tax he is seeking, sets aside about $ 10,000 per student per year.
As we sell subscriptions to students all over the world, as online video tutoring, you can receive income for yourself or tell us to donate the revenue generated from your lessons back to your classroom (up to $ 4,000 per month).
The new law also ensures that state charter schools are eligible for RESA (Regional Education Service Agency) services and membership; provides an increase in capital funds for brick and mortar state charter schools located in the boundaries of a local school district where the capital revenue (per student) exceeds the state average total capital (per student); increases per - student capital funding for virtual schools to offset certain technology costs; and provides a Department of Education and State Charter School Commission grant program for replicating high performing charter schools.
Nerad's recommended net cost of $ 5 million is based on the district's projected per - student spending limits under state revenue controls.
And so the scramble for cash goes as charters are incentivized to pick off students from the most well - off districts so they can maximize their per - pupil revenues.
The resulting revenue gap between the districts exceeds $ 900 per pupil even though Mesquite puts forth slightly greater tax effort and has a significantly more challenging student population.
When revenues were adjusted only for regional cost differences and the additional cost of educating students with disabilities, New York showed the greatest disparity between revenues available per student in the highest - and lowest - poverty districts — $ 2,040.
With an average tax payment of $ 7,500 per student, the 548 new — or recovered — student enrollees translates to a $ 4 million boost in revenue for the district.
«The loss of even a single student will reduce the revenue received,» the report states, because «the reduction of a single student in a classroom will not alleviate the need to have a teacher in that classroom... In fact, the per - pupil cost for that classroom or school would increase because the fixed expenses would remain, but the revenue to support them would be decreased.»
While the states experiencing protests are among the most severely affected — Reuters notes that they «have some of the lowest per - student spending in the country» — the effects of reduced public revenues and spending can be seen in national data as well.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z