In the U.S. recent hurricanes and wildfires have shown us how unprepared we are for this new normal, and crystalize the risks we face if we do not
reverse emissions trends.
Not exact matches
By decreasing
emissions, he said we may be able to stabilize rising seas long - term, but the
trend will likely be difficult to
reverse.
USA
emissions increased 2.9 %, due to a rebound in coal consumption potentially
reversing the downward
trend since the start of the shale - gas boom in 2007
Adaptation notwithstanding, Yohe and Schneider say that scientists must also figure out a way to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions to
reverse the heating
trend to prevent further damage.
«In a scenario of zeroed CO2 and sulfate aerosol
emissions, whether the warming induced by specified constant concentrations of non-CO2 greenhouse gases could slow the CO2 decline following zero
emissions or even
reverse this
trend and cause CO2 to increase over time is assessed.
Importantly, the study suggests there is a critical window of opportunity to
reverse the
trend in
emissions by halting deforestation and degradation, and actively restoring forests to degraded lands.
There has been minor sustained focus on natural / agriculture GHG
emissions and approaches to
reversing that
trend.
The free world might even, heaven forbid,
reverse the current, rather unthinking,
trend towards global free trade and institute a system of climate - based protectionism, to give force to our requirements that the entire globe reduce
emissions.
Secondly it magically
reverses the cooling
trend moment clean air legislation to reduce SO2
emissions is passed, despite the fact that the SO2
emissions have fallen only slowly.
Agriculture is responsible for about 8 % of U.S. heat - trapping gas
emissions, 23 and there is tremendous potential for farming practices to reduce
emissions or store more carbon in soil.24 Although large - scale agriculture in the Midwest historically led to decreased carbon in soils, higher crop residue inputs and adoption of different soil management techniques have
reversed this
trend.
But with our carbon
emissions we have not only
reversed that
trend, but will likely continue to warm the planet until well past the point at which there is no Arctic sea ice within the next few decades.
Additionally, when considering an
emissions floor, it could be argued that temperatures will be rising or falling so slowly that their
trend could be
reversed by actively intervening in the carbon cycle, or simply reducing or increasing
emissions by an amount substantially smaller than has already been achieved in reaching that floor.
To date, while various effects and feedbacks constrain the certainty placed on recent and projected climate change (EG, albedo change, the response of water vapour, various future
emissions scenarios etc), it is virtually certain that CO2 increases from human industry have
reversed and will continue to
reverse the downward
trend in global temperatures that should be expected in the current phase of the Milankovitch cycle.
The world is warming at an alarming rate, and scientists and economists agree that putting an effective price on carbon
emissions is the single most important thing we can do to
reverse this
trend.
The numerous mitigation measures that have been undertaken by many Parties to the UNFCCC and the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol in February 2005 (all of which are steps towards the implementation of Article 2) are inadequate for
reversing overall GHG
emission trends.
Businesses must act now to stop rising carbon
emissions Global carbon
emissions are still growing instead of falling — and businesses must take immediate action to
reverse this
trend.
We can curb
emissions IEA analyses show that there are alternatives — new policies and technologies that can
reverse this
trend.
It showcases solutions are available which can contribute to
reversing those negative
trends and make rapid progress towards zero
emission and human powered transport; in particular walking and cycling.
In light of the accelerating international consensus on climate, these talks, more than any other before them, have the best possible chance to result in a relatively ambitious and binding global agreement to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions — and if not
reverse, at least halt the warming
trend.