Sentences with phrase «review against the decision»

Not exact matches

However, readers do value company reviews that demonstrate their products» capabilities and how they stack up against competitors, especially when it comes to making major buying decisions.

In March, the agency ruled against an application by investors Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss to bring the first Bitcoin ETF to market, although the SEC recently said it would review that decision.

Thus make a plan that keeps your spouse advised of investment decisions — for example, I prepare and review with her a monthly report on changes to investment value (against a melded S&P 500 benchmark), also quarterly net worth statements, and semi-annual asset allocation summaries.

It lies, rather, in principled devotion to civil discourse» an open - ended discourse that conscientiously guards against premature closure, engaging varieties of moral vision and recognizing that decisions democratically made are subject to democratic review.

I think we need a radical approach to CHEATING my approach would eliminate it very quickly.When dubious decisions are taken which leads to a goal being scored from the resulting penalty or free kick and a player is sent off wrongly and the result goes against the team who have been penalised, when the review panel examine these issues clearly sees that the decision was the wrong one the the goal should be disallowed and the result should be reversed.But there is no one who has what it takes to introduce this ruling.Pity.

So far this year in the first four games we have reviewed there have been ten possible game changing decisions given wrongly against Arsenal and none for.

From these reviews I extract all of the wrong Important Decisions (Second yellow cards, Red Cards, Penalties and Goals) into a table with those favouring Arsenal in one column and against in a second.

On the same day Nixon announced her candidacy, Cuomo announced he has ordered the state attorney general's office to review a 2015 decision by Manhattan prosecutors to not pursue a sex abuse case against Harvey Weinstein.

LIPA's long - awaited review of current and future power needs cites a $ 5 billion price tag in recommending against an overhaul of two aging power plants and canceling a decision to build a large plant.

«The decision... to discontinue the charges against Mr Zuma is irrational and should be reviewed,» Pretoria High Court judge Aubrey Ledwaba said.

The ruling, which reverses a lower court's decision, came just over a week after ThinkProgress published the leaked records of Officer Daniel Pantaleo from the Civilian Complaint Review Board, showing he had seven disciplinary complaints and 14 individual allegations against him.

NEW YORK (WBEN / AP)-- New York's governor on Monday ordered the state attorney general to review a 2015 decision by Manhattan prosecutors to not pursue a sex abuse case against Harvey Weinstein.

The DWP decided to appeal against the decision and around the same time the Carmichaels» separate application for a judicial review of the underlying legislation was dismissed in the high court.

US Attorney Preet Bharara decided to drop charges against Michael Steinberg, the former SAC Capital Advisors portfolio manager convicted of insider trading, because the Supreme Court refused to review the Second Circuit's landmark Newman decision.

Carr was referring to the July 2015 decision by Manhattan State Supreme Court Justice Alice Schlesinger, who ruled in favor of the Legal Aid Society, which had sought a summary of the accusations that were lodged against Officer Daniel Pantaleo prior to Garner's death in 2014 and substantiated by the Civilian Complaint Review Board.

Levin replaced an earlier provision by Gillibrand with one that would require prosecution decisions to be reviewed by more senior leaders and would make it a crime to retaliate against those who report assaults.

Governor Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State on Monday appealed against the decision of an Oyo State High Court siting in Ibadan which declared the review of...

The Board also suggests engaging scientific bodies in reviews of pending policy decisions against scientific evidence.

On Friday, De Havilland's attorneys filed a petition with the California Supreme Court to review an appellate court's recent decision to toss out her case against FX over her portrayal in the miniseries «Feud: Bette and Joan.»

Defining a Eurozone Difference between a Free - trade area, Customs Union and a Single Market Objectives of setting up a Customs Union Economic Impact of UK's Decision to leave the EU Brexit Arguements: For and Against e.g. Legislation, Trade deals, Labour Migration, Uncertainty The post-Brexit Future Predictions DO N'T FORGET TO REVIEW!

The Department for Education (DfE) has said it disagrees with «some aspects» of the court's decision last month to rule against education secretary Nicky Morgan in a judicial review brought by six parents, but has not said which.

And while much of this might seem like nothing more than petty playground behavior between children who honestly do not have a clear good guy or bad guy, keep in mind that several ebook retailers incorporate the Goodreads» API into their sales pages, effectively posting book reviews that many in the Goodreads community knew to be false, and nothing more than an act of revenge against an author; real - world sales decisions have been made by consumers based on these reviews.

It is for the courts to ensure against discrimination, the role of the courts is one of review of Parliament's exercise of its powers; and decisions of the courts will be tempered by allowing to Parliament a margin of appreciation appropriate to the subject area of the complaint and to the complaint itself.

Indeed, Otis and other companies used this system of judicial review to bring actions against the decision, twice.

The Chief Coroner, Judge Mark Lucraft QC has taken the unprecedented step of backing a judicial review against his colleague's decision to apply a «cab rank rule» to burials.

When the Commission issues a decision against a given party, such party has at its disposal the complete system of judicial review provided by EU law, which includes the action for annulment at the General Court and the appeal to the CJEU.

Against this background, the ICC Commission's Task Force of Decisions as to Costs has reviewed hundreds of arbitral awards and has analysed in what manner arbitral tribunals exercise their discretion.

Acting for hydroelectric power operators and developers in judicial review proceedings against the Environment Agency arising from abstraction licensing decisions.

This was an appeal against a decision of Bean J to reject a judicial review of the Parking Adjudicator's decision in a test case concerning the effect of alleged defects in traffic signs and road markings on the liability to pay the penalty charge (a parking ticket).

The decision in Vinod Chopra Films Private Limited et al. v. John Doe 2010 FC 387 by Hughes, J. concerns a review of a «rolling» Anton Piller order granted by the Federal Court of Canada in a copyright infringement case to an Indian film production company and its Canadian licensee against various un-named persons who (according to the claim) «deal in counterfeit video recordings.»

The commission suggest as grounds of appeal against either DO that the person liable actually is not liable to pay maintenance or the DO has been made for the wrong amount and, against a decision on review, that there is no current maintenance calculation and the maximum deduction rate has been calculated based on the most recent information and that there has been a change in net weekly income.

Whereas the sources of Ofsted and the secretary of state's powers make their decisions plainly amenable to judicial review by Shoesmith, it is less clear that judicial review is available as a remedy against her employer.

For the purposes of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the jurisdiction of the Court is limited in the Treaties to whether Art. 40 TEU has been respected and to the review of legality of certain decisions taken based on Art. 275 (2) TFEU, the latter concerning essentially legal actions brought against the legality of decisions on restrictive measures against natural and legal persons taken by the Council.

The Court decided that (a) the process of surcharging by administrative bodies engaged the criminal part of Article 6 and (b) the Austrian courts hearing appeals against the surcharges did not have the jurisdiction to carry out a «full review» of the decision to surcharge; only that way could one turn the combination of administrative decision and court decision into a decision by a «tribunal» complying with Article 6.

It also had a target date today for a decision on whether (and, if so, to what extent) to review a preliminary ruling on Motorola's complaint against Microsoft.

I think this case is of interest to ABlawg readers because it involves the judicial review of a mineral royalty decision and it also concerns appellate - level consideration of the standard of review applicable to a ministerial decision — a topic of recent interest in the judiciary and which Professor Olszynski explores in his recent ABlawg post «Of Killer Whales, Sage - grouse, and the Battle Against (Madisonian) Tyranny».

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».

Under s 38, any judicial review claim against the minister or a member of the inquiry panel, must be brought within 14 days of the day on which the applicant became aware of the decision.

Having reviewed the European Charter and the lower court's decision in Goldeneye (International) Ltd v Telefonica Ltd [2012] EWHC 723 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 79 (Jul), his lordship concluded that many of the established principles for the grant of a Norwich Pharmacal order were relevant to the assessment of whether disclosure was proportionate under Art 8; the court's duty was to weigh the benefit of the information being sought by the RFU against the effect the disclosure was likely to have on the individual (s) concerned.

As a pupil, Zac was also involved in: R (on the application of RWE Generation UK Plc) v Gas and Electricity Markets Authority [2016] 1 CMLR 17, a challenge against a decision modifying the charges imposed on users of the National Grid (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); Speed Medical Examination Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 3585, a judicial review challenging reforms to the process for handling whiplash claims (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); and an application for interim relief by a company that had been redesignated under a European Union sanctions regime (as a pupil assisting Maya Lester).

The annual Haynes and Boone Securities Litigation Year in Review comments on significant securities - related decisions by the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts and district courts, notes key developments in SEC enforcement, and summarizes significant rulings in state law fiduciary litigation against directors and officers of public companies.

Mr. Whitney's representative work includes a series of successful outcomes pursuing false advertising claims against product review websites, a landmark victory clarifying copyright fair use and parody on behalf of several well - known musicians; a defense win dismissing copyright infringement claims brought by a putative class of attorneys against the leading legal research websites; a favorable outcome for a high - end beauty products company in a trademark and trade dress action against a manufacturer of knock - off products; a district and appellate court decision dismissing all claims by a proposed class against an international bank for alleged violations of, among other things, the Federal False Marking Act, RICO and the CAN - SPAM Act; and counseling prominent art museums and galleries on domestic and international copyright issues.

What mediation offers at the pre-trial stage is a guaranteed opportunity for all decision - makers to come together to review where a claim has reached and to check whether they can not or do not want to settle then, dealing with any communication breakdown so typical even now of litigation, and honestly reviewing and balancing the risks of ongoing investment of time and cost against any shortfall in available information — indeed often remedying that shortfall within the mediation process anyway.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced that it accepted review of Stoneridge Investment v. Scientific Atlanta, an 8th Circuit decision where the court held that civil liability for damages does not lie against defendants who merely «aid and abet» securities fraud unless those defendants actually made a mistatement.

«Since the time when the Review Panel made the decision to strike an Inquiry Committee to investigate allegations against Douglas ACJ, significant academic, legislative, and social changes have taken place that support the growing recognition that women whose intimate images are distributed without their consent are victims of a gendered form of abuse and worthy of protection while the perpetrators are morally culpable and deserving of criminal punishment.

It was open in principle to the claimant to bring a challenge by way of judicial review, on the ground of breach of legitimate expectation, to the defendant's decision to terminate her tenancy, just as it was open to her in principle to bring a challenge on Convention grounds against the defendant as a public authority.

If their decision is upheld, the only remedy is to bring judicial review proceedings against the LAA.

If the police decide that there is not enough evidence to charge your abuser at all, you can ask that the decision be reviewed by the officer's supervisor or you can «lay a private information» against him / her.

[5] Although the Court found against Cuozzo on both issues, the decision suggests that the Court views the AIA post grant proceedings as events akin to reexamination — a procedure to correct shortcomings during the earlier examination of the claims under review — rather than a streamlined, quasi-judicial procedure to invalidate suspect patents.

TOMEE SOJOURNER v. CONSEIL DE LA JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE et al Judicial Bias based on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Nature: Hearing on a Rental Board Judge's application to quash a Superior Court decision rendered in favor of an English - speaking Black lesbian, who had applied for judicial review of an earlier Administrative Judicial Council decision regarding her complaint against the Judge.