Sentences with phrase «review article because»

Firms should discourage associates from writing full - length law - review articles because the marginal cost of these projects — the associates» limited time — far outweighs any benefit to an associate's legal - writing skills.

Not exact matches

Then, because you work within a highly regulated industry, you send that time - critical article off for review.

In a recent Harvard Business Review article, Tim Evans cited Southwest Airlines as having been a disruptive force in the airline industry because of co-founder Herb Kelleher's ability to «think something different.»

Because after reviewing one article, I really want to try the matcha.

First of all, my comment about him being responsible for many of the goals we conceded last season against those 3 top teams is true, because I did an in depth article about it and reviewed the replays extensively for each of of those goals — I always back my claims up with stats or fact.

You can also read this article about baby light show projectors, because many parents share your experience and many of them are happy with the light show projector in the baby room... read this review here!

I linked it to my article on alternative menstrual products because you've reviewed some options I didn't.

According to this article in the Pittsburgh Tax Review, one reason that the US decided to implement an income tax (in addition to the array of other taxes introduced at that time) was because Western states objected to taxes only on consumption.

Fugh - Berman says review articles are also popular because busy physicians rely on experts to synthesize the medical literature and provide a clinically relevant summary.

This article is especially relevant today not only because it is a critical review of past research on moral education viewed through the lens and the work of the authors, but because it is also a critique of the current status of higher education and an argument for the need to focus more intentionally on equity and fairness.

Joel... I didn't do a super in - depth review because of the crazy money back guarantee and the fact that the article is so damn long already that I'm not sure anyone would read it.

I am laughing at myself because I am about to add a link here to a huff post article, but unlike these links posted above, this article is CHOCK FULL of scientifically sound sources and even more peer reviewed sources within the sources.

Congratulations on reading this article about Russian dating sites because I've done all the research for you — all you need to do is to relax and read these Russian dating sites reviews.

Just like last week when I did my Fire Emblem Warriors preview article, the time has come once again for me to publically speak out on Fire Emblem Warriors, only this time around, I'm allowed to disclose almost everything I could possibly want to mention, only instead of doing this Switch version focused review like another other review I have written, because of Fire Emblem Warrior's subject matter, I'm also going to take the time to point out the similarities between the Fire Emblem the Warriors game and Fire Emblem the series.

Article reviews are more important for the students but also for the journalists because they can understand what the other people think about their article and how and where they need to improve their wArticle reviews are more important for the students but also for the journalists because they can understand what the other people think about their article and how and where they need to improve their warticle and how and where they need to improve their writing.

You will realize many benefits from using the services of a professional company, because they will write your article review essay from scratch; therefore, you can be sure that your paper will be original.

Made almost comically explicit in the article is the idea that traditional arms - length reviewers do not have this credibility problem because they do not participate in the review process as adjuncts to marketing and sales.

So, if you are in a hurry of getting your article review done and are short of time, then it is most appropriate to contact review writing service because that can surely help you out.

Because you need help, so you must contact an article review writing service.

You do not need to worry about chosen sources because our writers use only relevant, recent peer - reviewed articles and other published materials.

Sometimes they're only recommending a book because someone paid them to, according to a long but fascinating new article about bookstores in The Boston Review!)

Some of them come to us for article review writing service because they have no time for completing it themselves, others are not interested in the topic.

It's hard to say what has worked best because I divide my efforts between: Twitter, blogs, writing articles (which have got me noticed in the kidlit arena) and being an absolute pest when it comes to asking people to review my book and / or interview me.

Because reviews, articles, and other public relations activities are a key way to sell books, your site must have information that makes it extremely easy for the press to write or talk about you.

If someone can't make up their mind on whether or not they should purchase a game after seeing all the reviews, youtube video, and articles... I can guarantee that they're the kind of person who will abuse the system to the fullest extent» Really so your saying because they didn't watch a YouTube clip or review (which we all know aren't to be trusted at times with the amount of broken games this gen) then it's the gamers fault and they will likely abuse the system.

This review may seemly rather short, especially in comparison to my usual rambling articles wherein I get lost in my own genius, but that's simply because there's not much to talk about in Gomo.

it just did nt get a article written about it because every review that isn't great for ps4 gets accused of being paid off.

Polygon has been down voted to hell on here yet the mods allow it to still have its articles and reviews posted because they think of it as a big enough site to be above the democratic voting system.

The article explains that every game review experience differs because every reviewer is influenced by a number of experiential and intuitive factors that dictate judgment, and no two reviewers will ever judge a game in the same way.

The article proposed that review scores should be retired because it is largely a detriment to gamers and games.

The article proposed that review scores should be retired because it is largely a detriment...

Some bloggers may state there is no such thing as an «objective» review or article; everything is colored one shade or another because of the inherent subjectivity present within semantics, and that isn't wrong.

Just like last week when I did my Fire Emblem Warriors preview article, the time has come once again for me to publically speak out on Fire Emblem Warriors, only this time around, I'm allowed to disclose almost everything I could possibly want to mention, only instead of doing this Switch version focused review like another other review I have written, because of Fire Emblem Warrior's subject matter, I'm also going to take the time to point out the similarities between the Fire Emblem the Warriors game and Fire Emblem the series.

Also, because I once linked to the Metacritic user reviews for Wind Waker, y ’ all should really check out this Kotaku article: http://kotaku.com/the-internets-2001-hate-for-one-of-the-most-beautiful-1441105533

I won't review each of the five games included because it would make for a very long article, and what's really important here is whether this omnibus of Metal Gear is worth the upgrade.

The peer review process is not effective for concepts that have not been demonstrated to work because articles are easily rejected or ignored.

The scientists say in the review article that change is urgent not only to protect the environment in Appalachia, but around the world, because poor countries are poised to replicate the practices established in the United States.

I can not say that I was surprised when the editors informed me that they would not be sending it out for review because «we are not persuaded that your article represents a sufficiently substantial contribution to the «climate change debate» [my quotation marks] to justify publication in the journal».

«The irony of this is, that when I submit articles to peer - review publications, it gets a more rigorous review because everyone knows who I am,» he said.

Environmental lawyers or climate lawyers might try to discredit Lindzen because none of his accusations appears in peer - reviewed journal articles.

I see problems with: * you have to be an active promoter of yourself to get articles read * the review process (mainly there is no ability to assess why rejected articles are rejected and the time wasting because of pedantic comments) * project - based funding and treating research like consulting (if I can tell you how much a project will cost, then by definition it is not research) * since academia seems to be drifting towards consulting, researchers start to become underpaid compared to peers in consulting * the focus on the number of publications weighted by the rank of the journal * status is based on if you publish in a high - rank journal, «selected» to be a lead author, and so on, and not whether you do good and creative research, good collaborator, good colleague to peers, etc..

Respondents were picked because they had authored articles with the key words «global warming» and / or «global climate change», covering the 1991 — 2011 period, via the Web of Science, or were included the climate scientist database assembled by Jim Prall, or just by a survey of peer reviewed climate science articles.

Blogs and other articles argued incorrectly that a report, the «Global Review of Forest Fires,» should not have been cited as a reference, because

Because of the current poor fidelity of the models, the conclusions written in many «peer reviewed» articles describing potential conditions many years into the future seem imo to be utterly without scientific merit and simple speculation.

Transient Climate Sensitivity (TCS) is a more realistic way to evaluate the actual global warming effects of CO2 that can be validated with actual data, but TCS is rarely reported in peer - reviewed paper or media articles, because the sensitivity is about half the ECS value and is not so alarming.

Much evidence indicates that — because it was not revised by an anonymous, prejudiced, so - called «peer - review» process as an article published against the wishes of a prejudiced editor being paid to deny such articles — it is all the more credible.

Because of all the media attention that Webster et al. (2005) received, during the press embargo period, journalists sent the Hoyos et al. paper out for review to apparently quite a large number of climate researchers, mathematicians, and statisticians, a number of whom were quoted in media articles or who emailed us personally with questions.

The review is important because the experience with the CDM is likely to influence how the future sustainable development mechanism (SDM) under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement functions and is run.

It would be interesting to put the list into Excel, because only I have a list of over 150 articles (refereed journals, peer review) of which 50 % are not on your list.

Re: 11 That Gilder essay makes the amusing claim that the Oreskes article should be discounted because it was published in Sciences «Essays» section rather than in the peer reviewed literature.