The review authors point to the vegetarians» abundant intake of whole grains, fruits and vegetables as the key to their improved weight loss, noting that higher - fiber diets have been proven to be more satisfying.
Not exact matches
Explaining their findings in Harvard Business
Review, the study's
authors, Harvard's Robert Huckman and Bradley Staats of the University of North Carolina,
pointed to the time it takes new team members to learn how to communicate with one another and determine who is the best authority in different areas.
Finally, imagine that in a
review of «Christ in the Concert Hall,» a gifted musician /
author came along and
pointed out that the
author focused on «only one current» within the diverse river of Christianity.
In order to understand it, we must lay some groundwork by
reviewing what the
author of the book of Hebrews has said up to this
point.
He understood, said the
Review, that the evil of racism was not unique: «It is, as the
author points out, the same problem of prejudice which in varying degrees affects all groups of whatever color, race or religion.
A
review that does not honestly deal with the substance of a book but only with the perceived political and / or psychological
point of view of the
author is a poor
review.
Moreover, if editors and reviewers for peer -
reviewed journals notice similarities between a submitted manuscript and work already posted on arXiv, they can
point the
authors to the preprint and ask them to discuss and cite it.
Shriver says that he and Erlich
pointed out their concerns to the study
authors in their
reviews of the paper for Science.
The
authors hope their
review will provide a useful starting
point for evaluating the impact of changes in marijuana legislation.
The
authors point to studies of harmful and beneficial effects of thrombolytic and antiarrhythmic drugs for myocardial infarction, for example: «Not only would systematic
reviews... have reduced waste resulting from unjustified research, they would also have shown how to reduce morbidity and sometimes mortality, both in patients allocated to relatively less effective or actually harmful treatments in unnecessary trials, and in patients generally,» the
authors write.
From how much space the
authors devote to background information and literature
reviews, to their use of bullet
points to describe their goals, these methods of presenting information «leave an impression on you,» says Franklin.
In Kijewski - Correa's case, she purposely developed a three -
point rubric for all papers she
reviews, which ensures that she remains consistent and impartial, and provides a clear mechanism to tell the
authors what they can do better.
The
authors rightly acknowledge this, and
point out that the association may be explained by confounding factors (other background factors which are linked to both antacid use and asthma risk) which have not been adequately controlled for in the studies included in their
review.
Authors of this
review point out that early post-menopausal women who took 2 grams of maca, in capsule form, daily showed improvements in hormone levels and reductions in menopausal symptoms — like night sweats and hot flashes.
Global dating llc Plan Vin Eesti dating site Ripoff Report Brian K Jackson Complaint
Review Anaheim California
Author Consumer Employee Owner Earning and Using Hilton Honors
Points Hilton Honors.
Somewhere in the
review I support the
author for it critics and good
points about the story.
Thus the
authors review in detail the educational experiences and
points of view of the last President Bush and President Obama, and they would argue that neither No Child Left Behind nor Race to the Top were written in the cards: the programs were specifically shaped by presidents whose own educational experiences demonstrated to them the need for effort and judgment.
I was shopping for a 2011 C300 4Matic Sport Mercedes Benz and choose King
Point Auto primarily due to the reviews on Mike... I don't know if he is the... author of the cars description, but it was right on point: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing the
Point Auto primarily due to the
reviews on Mike... I don't know if he is the...
author of the cars description, but it was right on
point: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing the
point: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing the car.
Good
point about
authors with 5 * -
reviewing friends!
As Taylor, its
author,
points out, the answer depends on whether your immediate goal is to reach new readers and generate sales (along, presumably, with
reviews), or to make a profit.
And I think you make a great
point that MOST
reviews are NOT meant for the
authors.
Passive Guy had a highly interesting query for the commenters: why don't
authors who've suffered an onslaught of one - star
reviews point it out in the book description on Amazon?
The
point is that all
authors need to focus on generating
reviews on Amazon on an ongoing basis.
She
pointed me to a rant, posted anonymously by someone at a book
review site, screaming at DIY
authors like me using the term «Indie,» as in Indie
author or Indie publisher.
Most of them apply with an extra exclamation
point for those who are receiving
review copies for free from the publisher or
author.
Since this article was so popular, we knew
reviews were a real pain
point for
authors like you.
Unfortunately, I've also been in contact with a number of
authors who had less than stellar things to say about the company, and at a certain
point I realized that they weren't going to hold up with a good
review.
I don't know a single
author who hasn't at least considered asking Amazon to remove a
review at some
point or another.
My
point is, an
author is giving money and getting
reviews in return.
Barlow did
point out some of the things that were missing when an
author decides to self - publish, namely things like promotion, professional
reviews, and support from the imprint.
I defended my
review of another
author's book and also
pointed out that out of my hundreds of
reviews averaging 4.3 and up on Amazon, only five were
authors who'd I also read.
So, yes her
point is still valid because I've seen
authors lose there shit over constructive negative
reviews.
And that is the
point that I hopefully made in the article, that there are
authors who not only rant but who enlist their legions of readers to counterattack a negative
review.
But one of my
points in other posts was, why is it that if a reviewer has a problem with an
author regarding a
review, the reviewer goes and gets their friends to join in and attack the
author?
I do want to
point out that there are reviewers who feel an
author is NEVER allowed to speak about a
review.
A few of their key selling
points are; Guaranteed book
reviews with Readers» Favorite and Story Cartel, Promotion through PR Newswire,
Author Marketing Club, and WriterCube, and an Exclusive guide: Ultimate Social Media Marketing for
Authors.
I work with mainly self - published
authors and when I send out
review requests on their behalf I make it a
point to read every policy and be sure as much as I can that the blogger does want requests.
An excellent book
review is beyond that and you need to describe the theme of the book, analyze every part of it and also the major
points that conveyed by the
author through the themes.
In his
review, Hunter makes a
point of stating that while he does read the books that are sent to him (an
author must put in a request beforehand) he makes it clear that there is little chance that he will mention it.
But as he
points out in his book, Amazon
reviews are important for marketing, and I make a
point to post
reviews for all the indie
authors I read.
But it will probably bother the
author, who has paid someone to organise a tour and get her Amazon
reviews... which is the
point.
That is then coupled with an attitude that can be found on the Kindle
author boards, which says that anyone giving a self - published
author a bad
review is «jealous» — or in extreme cases that bad
reviews are obviously the work of the evil publishers, trying to knock the competition, and that the last thing you should do is pay attention to those nit - pickers who
point out problems with your work.
A concentrated burst of sales and
reviews is the fastest way to move up Amazon's list, at which
point they promote you themselves, so some
authors pay for
reviews.
But my larger
point remains valid: it's understandable that indie
authors, in certain cases, might pay for
reviews.
AMY: I am, if nothing else, a realist and at this
point in time — while I don't condone it — I totally get why indie
authors are likely to reach for their wallets in order to generate reader
reviews and / or to call in favors to their peers.
Despite the naysayers who have already come out of the woodwork to express dubious opinions about Penguin's motives and its ability to maintain the site purely for the furthering of the craft, Book Country exists to encourage writers and readers to come together via the web to read,
review, and discuss each others» manuscripts in order to bring them to the
point the
authors wish.
If you get common
points in
reviews in your own books, remember that reviewers are readers writing for other readers, they're not professional
authors and gifted teachers writing a personal feedback to the
author.
The only time I relax my «Check the
reviews» rule is when the price
point is so low that I don't care if I don't like the book that much, or if the
author is someone who has consistently put out a good product.
June 22nd: Starter Day Party @ I Heart Reading June 23rd: Book Excerpt @ Indy Book Fairy June 24th: Book Excerpt @ Sunshine Book Promotions June 25th: Promo Post @ Nat's Book Nook June 26th: Book
Review and
Author Interview @ Mommy's
Point of View June 28th: Promo Post @ Undercover Book
Reviews June 29th:...
As I posted on Passive Guy's blog: I would just like to
point out that Amazon published
authors like myself (Thomas and Mercer) are NOT immune from
reviews being removed by Amazon.