Sentences with phrase «review authors stated»
The review authors stated, «Several large scale prospective cohort studies found positive correlation between artificial sweetener use and weight gain.»
http://www.progressivehealth.com/ Not exact matches
Richard Hausknecht, the author of the article in the New England Journal of Medicine, acknowledged that the «abortion cocktail» was indeed an experiment when he stated in his report that «the protocol [of the experiment] was approved by the investigative review board of the Mount Sinai Medical Center.»
Burge, like the other authors reviewed here, recounts the atrocity carried out by Jewish terrorists at the Arab village of DeirYassin just prior to the declaration of the Israeli state in 1948.
He is the author of Industrial Power and the Soviet State (OUP, 1993) and, with Robert Rohrschneider (Kansas University), of The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe (OUP, 2012), as well as many peer - reviewed articles on issues in social and political change and stability in post-Communist Europe.
On Wednesday, The State Senate's Standing Committee on Energy and Telecommunications met to review and approved legislation proposed by Hudson Valley Senator Terence Murphy, who joined the committee to provide detailed information on the legislation he authored, S. 7262.
Briffault, the author of several dozen law review articles on campaign finance law and local government, has been a member of several commissions dealing with state and local governance.
But Stec, who previously signed onto a letter authored by neighboring 113th District Democratic Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner asking for further review of EPA's Hudson River cleanup, agreed with the governor and state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman that it may not be time to deem the cleanup complete.
He is the author of more than 200 peer - reviewed and edited publications and serves as director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University.
Mann, director of Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Center, on Monday sued the National Review and the Competitive Enterprise Institute, along with two of their authors, Rand Simberg and Mark Steyn.
To document your accomplishments in research, your CV should contain a chronological list of books, edited books, book chapters, journal articles, technical reports, and other work, clearly denoting what is published and what is under review (if there are multiple authors, you need to state your role); funding received with you as principal investigator or co-investigator; and proposals submitted but not funded.
In September, the publisher retracted a paper in BMC Systems Biology, stating that it believed that «the peer - review process was compromised and inappropriately influenced by the authors».
«Current techniques for assessing an individual's age at death rely on reviewing the wear and tear on a skeleton's joint surfaces,» says Ann Ross, a professor of biological sciences at NC State and corresponding author of a paper on the work.
In an email to Science, the paper's corresponding author, Toshihiro Nakajima of Tokyo Medical University, defended the work, stating: «Our manuscript was formally published after an intensive scientific review done by reviewers and by the editorial board of Scientific Reports.»
The authors state that: «The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of our institutions... and informed written consent was obtained from the patient.»
Despite dozens of new nuclear plants ordered or built in Asia in recent years, «increased deployment of nuclear power has been slow both in the United States and globally,» wrote the authors of a new Massachusetts Institute of Technology review of the state of nuclear power.
The review's authors, Dr Jessica Quimby, of the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences at Ohio State University, and Dr Dori Borjesson, of the Veterinary Institute for Regenerative Cures at the University of California - Davis, consider the emergence of this new therapeutic strategy and the current understanding of the biology and immunology of mesenchymal stem cells.
And, according to the authors of a new literature review in the May issue of The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons are the third highest prescribers of opioid prescriptions among physicians in the United States — behind primary care physicians and internists.
In the review, the authors propose that thoughts flow freely when the mind is in its default state — mind - wandering.
Some 32 % of Indian authors and 22 % of Chinese authors opted for double - blind review, compared with only 8 % of authors from France and 7 % from the United States.
Editors from the other 20 had e-mailed the fictitious corresponding authors stating that the paper was still under review; those, too, are excluded from this analysis.
«The potential of drone technology in research may only be limited by our ability to envision novel applications,» comments Mitch Cruzan, lead author of the review and professor in the Department of Biology at Portland State University.
The author of the review states it is easy to incorporate music and singing into nursing practice, as they are widely available, inexpensive and non-controversial, with minimal ethical, legal or cultural concerns.
Michael holds a master's degree in literature from the University of Colorado at Boulder and a bachelor's from the University of Texas at Austin; he is also the author of a well - reviewed book on the history of wolves in the United States called Predatory Bureaucracy: The Extermination of Wolves and the Transformation of the West (University Press of Colorado, 2005).
The review, authored by an international team of medical experts from Saudi Arabia, India and the United States and published in Nutrition and Metabolism, credited vitamin D with being an effective treatment and prevention option for liver disease and cancers.
However, the authors of the review state that this data was not reported well enough to be taken in total confidence even though the findings do suggest «several potential benefits» for students.
This report reviews 16 studies conducted in seven states; 103 of 112 comparisons show positive results in writing achievement favoring students in classrooms of NWP participants, based on grading by «blind» coders who did not know whether the author received NWP teaching.
That is one of the questions an independent review panel has recommended that the authors of the U.S. history standards answer about the colonization of North America as a way to strengthen the standards so they can be used by states and local districts.
Reviewed The Boston Globe, April 23, 2012» «The thesis almost universally accepted throughout the state - that wealthy parents are driving this process - is not found at all,» said Thomas Hehir, one of the study's authors, who is a professor at the Harvard University Graduate School of Education and is a former director of the special education office at the US Department of Education.»
Brian has been involved with creating policies, models, and criteria for promoting validity, reliability, and credibility in both assessments and accountability systems through work with groups such as the U.S. Department of Education (co-author of Accountability Peer Review guidance; Growth Model Pilot guidance), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO)(author of documents on the design of accountability systems and balanced assessment systems), National Center for Educational Outcomes (NCEO)(author of research reports on standardization and reliability for assessment systems for students with disabilities), and several state Technical Advisory CommitState School Officers (CCSSO)(author of documents on the design of accountability systems and balanced assessment systems), National Center for Educational Outcomes (NCEO)(author of research reports on standardization and reliability for assessment systems for students with disabilities), and several state Technical Advisory Commitstate Technical Advisory Committees.
Collaborative for Student Success Executive Director Jim Cowen authored an opinion piece in The Hill about the importance of the independent peer review of state submitted ESSA plans.
According to the report, 10 out of 20 states reviewed allow tax filers to bring in more from combined state and federal credits and deductions than they donate, a loophole that the report's author said makes their donations more like money laundering than philanthropy.
Students read books and blog about them with people who live in different states, interact online with authors and experts, and study for tests using StudyCasts, recorded test reviews that they can download to an MP3 player.
Based on this review, the authors identified sustainable state policies that can ease shortages while also prioritizing student learning and a strong teacher workforce.
The study, which the authors and other experts described as the first scientifically rigorous review of merit pay in the United States, measured the effect of financial incentives on teachers in Nashville public schools and found that better pay alone was not enough to inspire gains.
The authors» review of 35 approved state flexibility (NCLB waiver) plans found that 32 mentioned using RTI / tiered instruction approaches.
In their 2005 study Learning Transfer: A Review of the Research in Adult Education and Training, authors Sharan B. Merriam and Brendan Leahy state that, while organizations spend millions of dollars every year on continuing education and training, «less than 10 % of this expenditure pays off in improved performance at work.»
Sen. Paul Farrow, R - Pewaukee, author of the Senate school accountability bill, said Tuesday the Senate will still work on its accountability bill, and is likely going to remove the legislation's proposal to create two review boards for schools at the state's DPI and Department of Administration.
Midwest Book Review (http://www.midwestbookreview.com) states on its website that it «gives priority consideration to small publishers, self - published authors... whenever possible.»
The authors who have received these not so polite threats of having their books pulled from Amazon (costing them their rankings and their reviews, even if Amazon later realizes the error and reinstates the book) have repeatedly stated that they are entitled to use a very old word in their titles.
They stated that, and I quote, «We are unable to post your review because your account activity indicates that you know the author.
The site does state, however, that authors are better off launching a book promotion «after your book has some reviews.»
The review did not express their opinions of the author... it stated their opinion of his writing and the opinion he wrote his essay on.
Hugh Howey initially was not going to respond to the post, but reader outrage over the supposedly - outed authors prompted him to post on his blog and to state what many reader fans are now calling the «Jolie Pledge,» a statement Howey made asserting that he had never bought a book review and good - naturedly pledged it on his dog's life.
The real shame of the entire saga is that this is the kind of book that, despite the poor reviews that state it is poorly written and barely erotic, is exactly what self - published authors have benefited from in a big way.
The one - star reviews of books that are not even published yet are definitely harmful to an author's career because consumers who go to an outside ebook retailer to pre-order or purchase the book will see those ratings and reviews and not be aware of the current sad state of ugliness between authors and reviewers.
This practice has firmly divided the world of authors and readers, with some authors stating they make it a known practice to respond to reviews, while others state that an author should never delve into discussion of what a reader thinks of his book.
For authors looking for reviews, I suggest looking at blog tour companies that offer review tours or queries, reaching out to your newsletter list, and looking at blog directories for bloggers with review policies that state they accept book requests that line up with your book.
In his review, Hunter makes a point of stating that while he does read the books that are sent to him (an author must put in a request beforehand) he makes it clear that there is little chance that he will mention it.
Are these individuals who post this sort of thing under «reviews» on Goodreads correct in saying the author is a «badly behaving author» because they stated that this was inappropriate and reported it to Goodreads staff, who did nothing about it?
Another traditionally published author told me he used to write reviews if he liked the books, until his own books got «submarine» reviews on the above - mentioned sites after he gave one author's book 4 stars and not 5, despite the fact that he stated why he hadn't given the book 5 stars.