Sentences with phrase «review board procedures»

He is highly experienced in various forms of dispute resolution including litigation, international arbitration, domestic arbitration, adjudication and other alternative dispute resolution procedures including conciliation and dispute adjudication and dispute review board procedures.

Not exact matches

Yellen noted that the Fed board has undertaken a review of procedures at each regional bank.

They reviewed our compliance program extensively, requesting we tighten up aspects of our on - boarding procedures and add payment monitoring features.

The standard of review for questions of procedure is (at para 70) «correctness with some deference to the Board's choice of procedure».

Study procedures were approved by the University of Washington institutional review board.

«We have looked at the budget document closely and reviewed the manner in which it was supposedly passed by our colleagues on the Board, and our conclusion is that the result is flawed because of potentially disqualifying procedures during its enactment,» said BOL Chairman Ken Jenkins (D - Yonkers).

Committee members are jointly appointed by the AAAS Board and Council, and among the Committee's duties is to «formulate and recommend principles and procedures to guide the Association in a continuing review of issues that affect scientific freedom and scientific responsibility, and to search for means that will effectively bring these issues to the attention of both scientists and others.»

The AAAS Board charged the new special Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility, chaired by Allen V. Astin, former director of the National Bureau of Standards,» (i) to study and report on the general conditions required for scientific freedom and responsibility; (ii) to develop suitable criteria and procedures for the objective and impartial study of these problems; and (iii) to recommend mechanisms to enable the Association to review specific instances in which scientific freedom is alleged to have been abridged or otherwise endangered, or responsible scientific conduct is alleged to have been violated.»

The white paper recommends that practitioners follow relevant guidance documents and that deviation from consensus recommendations should be supported by clinical studies or pursued in the setting of a clinical trial approved by an institutional review board; that practitioners receive training in a new procedure before beginning its practice, that the training should include a practical, «hands - on» component and that all team members directly involved with the radiation therapy decisions should participate in at least five proctored cases before performing similar procedures independently; and that professional societies should accelerate the generation of new or updated guidance documents for the following disease sites and techniques: skin, central nervous system, gastrointestinal, lung or endobronchial and esophagus, and, while outside the charge of this panel, assess the need for updated guidance documents for accelerated partial breast irradiation using electronic brachytherapy.

The recommendations for the board include reviewing the rules, procedures and responsibilities in a number of areas.

(E) not serve on a full - time basis, except that the Board of Directors shall meet at least quarterly to review, as appropriate, applications for credit support and set policies and procedures as necessary.

An independent review board determined that the MGS team did follow the correct procedures to help the spacecraft, but added that the procedures themselves were not strong enough to «catch the errors that occurred».

In considering applications, reviewers are instructed to address the two Merit Review Criteria as approved by the National Science Board - Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts (NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide).

The use and care of animals used in this study was approved by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Board in accordance with UK Home Office regulations, the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act of 1986.

The institutional review board at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai approved all study procedures, and every participant provided written, informed consent.

All research procedures involving human corneal tissues carried out in this project were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Alabama at Birmingham.

The Court's decision to hear Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education (Case No. 84 - 1340) marked the first time in recent years that it has agreed to review the use of affirmative - action procedures by school officials.

The board of education or trustees of each school district shall develop, in consultation with appropriate school personnel, procedures for the recommendation, approval, provision, periodic review, and termination of such services.

Previously, a further appeal after a review would focus only on the procedures used by the exam board when marking the test, but schools will now be able to appeal the mark itself if they believe it was not corrected during the review.

Check out the ACLU's Model Sanctuary School Board Policy for «Procedures for Identifying and Reviewing Information Sharing Agreements» (also available in Spanish) to tell your school leaders how to draft policies that include these protections.

The report recommends the PVET board prepares an action plan for the EFA, review the policies and procedures in place and periodically reviewed and checked and pupil premium expenditure, overtime payments and recruitment policies are properly managed and approved.

The boards bylaws, policies and procedures shall be reviewed as often as necessary and be continually updated to remain consistent with practice.

• Review the procedures that the National Assessment Governing Board and the National Center for Education Statistics use to determine (or «set») the achievement levels and the minimum score needed to be placed in each category.

The provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, shall apply to procedures under this section, and an order of compliance issued by the Board shall be a final order for purposes of judicial review.

(Note: If the Contractor has or maintains a relationship with a Department of Health and Human Services approved Institutional Review Board (IRB) which can appropriately review this contract in accordance with the technical requirements and applicable NHTSA policies and procedures, that IRB will be considered acceptable for the purposes of this contReview Board (IRB) which can appropriately review this contract in accordance with the technical requirements and applicable NHTSA policies and procedures, that IRB will be considered acceptable for the purposes of this contreview this contract in accordance with the technical requirements and applicable NHTSA policies and procedures, that IRB will be considered acceptable for the purposes of this contract).

The Board of Trustees regularly reviews fair value determinations made by the fund pursuant to the procedures.

The Board of Trustees regularly reviews fair value determinations made by the funds pursuant to the procedures.

Coordinates efforts with the Board of Directors to develop long - range programs and review policies and procedures.

We educate you about recommended surgery (such as spaying, neutering, and dental cleaning), review important grooming procedures (such as nail trims for all exotic pets and wing trims for birds), discuss therapeutic beak trims for birds with injured or diseased beaks, talk about the interaction of your new pet with other pets in your home, and discuss your new pet's health requirements for boarding at the Veterinary Center, should you decide to let your pet stay with us while you are away.

Besides a detailed application process, in which we review organizational qualifications such as financial stability, fundraising procedures, board oversight, permits and licenses, organizational bylaws, educational materials and veterinary references, we also visit all animal sanctuaries to assure that their facilities and animal care merit our endorsement.

Letters for appeal will be responded to within two weeks, and a review of the application will be completed within two months by the Board of Directors, excluding the President, following the same guidelines and anonymous scoring procedure as the Application Review Commreview of the application will be completed within two months by the Board of Directors, excluding the President, following the same guidelines and anonymous scoring procedure as the Application Review CommReview Committee.

Inter partes review (IPR) is a procedure within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) which authorizes a board (namely, the Patent Trial and Appeals board) to reconsider and cancel an already - issued patent claim.

Municipalities should review their administrative procedures to ensure that administrative review boards comply with these requirements.

• Any class member must have the ability to request the Court to review the procedures by which the Registry selects members of its board of directors, and to evaluate whether the Registry properly considers the interests of all class members in its decision - making.

On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision rejecting certain procedures adopted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) limiting a patent owner's ability to amend claims during Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings under the America Invents Act.

Administrative Order Establishing Procedures for Review of Parenting Coordinator Disciplinary Review Board

The arbitration board reviewed the Collective Agreement provision, which provides that «The College shall pay 100 % of the billed premium of the extended health care plan for partial load employees... subject to the application procedures for this benefit.»

Tags: 35 U.S.C. § 103, 35 USC 102, CBM, Christy, class action, compensation, Court of Federal Claims, covered business method review, due process, Fifth Amendment, inter partes review, IPR Proceedings, lawsuit, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, PGR, post grant procedures, post grant proceedings, post grant review, PTAB Trials, Takings Clause, vacuum cleaner

For documentation of privacy board approval that used an expedited review procedure, the covered entity must ensure that the documentation indicates that the privacy board met the expedited review requirements of the privacy rule.

The NPRM would not have required documentation of IRBs» or privacy boards» review and approval procedures.

(B) A privacy board must review the proposed research at convened meetings at which a majority of the privacy board members are present, including at least one member who satisfies the criterion stated in paragraph (i)(1)(i)(B)(2) of this section, and the alteration or waiver of authorization must be approved by the majority of the privacy board members present at the meeting, unless the privacy board elects to use an expedited review procedure in accordance with paragraph (i)(2)(iv)(C) of this section;

Beyond the AIA anti-joinder rules, there are at least two other changes to the landscape in recent years: the availability of the review procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO, and the Supreme Court's decision of the Alice v. CLS Bank case in June of 2014.

If a privacy board elects to use an expedited review procedure, the review and approval of the alteration or waiver of authorization may be carried out by the chair of the privacy board, or by one or more members of the privacy board as designated by the chair.

Beyond the AIA anti-joinder rules, there are at least two other changes to the landscape in recent years: the availability of the review procedures at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO, and the Supreme Court's decision of the Alice -LSB-...]

(C) A privacy board may use an expedited review procedure if the research involves no more than minimal risk to the privacy of the individuals who are the subject of the protected health information for which use or disclosure is being sought.

Issues raised during the case included the government's refusal to fund interviews with the prisoner conducted by the Parole Board as part of the risk assessment procedure, and the making of rules by the government about the manner in which the Parole Board conducted reviews.

The proposals are the direct result of an urgent government review into the policy and procedures of Parole Board decisions, which began in January 2018.

As branch HR Generalist I would assist with employee relation issues, new hire / on boarding, annual reviews, progressive discipline, employee terminations, policy and procedure development, and benefit administration.

Review and updates policies and procedures at least annually for review by CEO and Review and updates policies and procedures at least annually for review by CEO and review by CEO and Board.

, Conducted reviews to identify risk areas and establish protocol to control or eliminate problems, Made quarterly recommendations to executive management and Board of Directors, Conducted regular audits and analyzed reports, Created methods of improvement and procedures