Sentences with phrase «review draft expert»

The Court of Appeal held that appointing experts can review draft expert reports.

In Moore v. Getahun, 2015 ONCA 55, the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed this issue and confirmed that lawyers and experts can and often should work together to prepare expert reports, and counsel can review draft expert reports.

The trial judge in Moore v. Getahun, 2014 ONSC 237 had held that experts can not consult with their appointing lawyers, and counsel can not review draft expert reports.

Not exact matches

Asked about the state's exchanges with USGS and the effect they had on the final report, a spokeswoman provided the following statement: «While the report was drafted by USGS, it simply underwent a technical review by NYSERDA staff and other experts, including experts from other state agencies like the Department of Environmental Conservation.

The DEC spokeswoman, Emily DeSantis, says the health experts are reviewing the «entire» draft environmental impact statement, which has not yet been released to the public.

«Most researchers would not find [the proposed rules] a great departure from what they're already doing,» says Columbia University bioterrorism expert Stephen Morse, who reviewed a draft of the report.

The document Miller reviewed was an early draft, leaked to Ed Week, of what experts were creating for the National Governor's Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers.

For example, Gov. Mike Pence invited a committee of independent experts, led by Common Core critic Sandra Stotsky, to review a draft of Indiana's new standards.

A bill draft circulated by Rep. Jeremy Thiesfeldt outlines potential new legislation to protect teachers, but a review by WEAC experts shows it falls short of its stated goal.

The material is drafted on the spot by a talented expert, and it is thoroughly reviewed, edited, proofread, and even screened for plagiarism prior to submission.

The present AR4 - WGI process started back in April 2004 when the author teams of the report were selected and the Lead Authors first met in September in Italy to launch the composition of the «zero order draft» which was subsequently submitted to the Technical Support Unit (TSU) for an informal review by invited experts (mostly well - known scientists).

She was, after all, Obama's secretary of state, and it was under her that the State Department issued a draft review approving Keystone XL that was sharply criticized by Obama's own EPA, but still approved in final form, despite the objection of expert critics such as James Hansen, director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who has argued that the big - picture global warming concerns mean that tar sands must be left in the ground:

In the multi-stage review, 1089 experts provided 54,677 comments on the draft text.

The revised draft is then sent back to the expert reviewers and also to government representatives for the government review stage.

I know I would be.Sign - up now open for expert review of AR5 (second order draft)

More than 450 lead authors received input from more than 800 contributing authors, and an additional 2,500 experts reviewed the draft documents.

Any expert can sign up to review the drafts, making the IPCC report process one of the most open and inclusive in the world of science.»

(Alec Rawls) I participated in «expert review» of the Second Order Draft of AR5 (the next IPCC report), Working Group 1 («The Scientific Basis»), and am now making the full draft available to the puDraft of AR5 (the next IPCC report), Working Group 1 («The Scientific Basis»), and am now making the full draft available to the pudraft available to the public.

It was developed following a rigorous procedure that included drafting and review by experts in the field, comments by the membership, and careful review by the AMS Council prior to approval as a statement of the Society.

Draft reports are then reviewed by experts who were not authors of the report.

In a draft report leaked to me soon after it appeared for peer review in May 2000, an expert panel chosen among 3,000 atmospheric scientists looked at Caldeira's computer simulations and agreed that Teller's scheme might work.

Utilising IPCC procedures, nominated experts from around the world draft the reports that are then extensively reviewed twice before approval by the IPCC.

Of course, the success of this focus on melding natural and social sciences for the purpose of decision - making depends on the existence and effective use of the work of the relevant social scientist experts, as we pointed out earlier in our review comment on the draft plan.

During the second review by government and experts, Second Order Drafts and a first draft of the Summary for Policymakers will be distributed through the government focal points to all governments, all authors, reviewers involved in the previous expert review and further experts registering for the review.

During the first review, First Order Drafts are widely circulated to independent experts all over the world that have significant expertise and / or publications in particular areas of the report, and to experts nominated earlier by governments and participating organizations.

Especially given that, as I said above, anyone who wanted to take part in the review process and give their opinion on the draft documents had the opportunity to do so by applying to become an «expert» reviewer.

The First Order Draft is subject to a formal Expert Review, where any expert is encouraged to comment on all aspects of the draft, including, but not limited to, issues of interpretation, missed literature, and presentaDraft is subject to a formal Expert Review, where any expert is encouraged to comment on all aspects of the draft, including, but not limited to, issues of interpretation, missed literature, and presentadraft, including, but not limited to, issues of interpretation, missed literature, and presentation.

There are three stages of review involving more than 2,500 expert reviewers who collectively submitted 90,000 review comments on the drafts.

The second order draft of the report and the first draft of the SPM are subject to simultaneous review by both governments and experts.

After the first order draft has been reviewed by experts, authors prepare a second order draft of the report and a first draft of its Summary for Policymakers (SPM).

The procedures address all steps leading to the preparation of IPCC material starting with the scoping process, nomination process and selection of authors, preparation of drafts by the writing teams, the review by experts and governments and finally the approval, adoption and acceptance process in plenary sessions.

According to the spokesperson of the ministry Krishna Prasad Acharya, the draft of the plan is already ready and is being reviewed by experts.

«As part of its commitment to openness and transparency, the IPCC releases drafts that have been submitted for formal expert and / or government review, review comments on these drafts, and author responses to these comments after publication of the associated IPCC Report or Technical Paper.

In the course of the multi-stage review process - first by experts and then by governments and experts - both expert reviewers and governments are invited to comment on the accuracy and completeness of the scientific, technical and socio - economic content and the overall balance of the drafts.

103 experts from 52 countries were selected as Coordinating Lead Authors and Lead Authors — who will draft each individual chapter - and Review Editors, who will ensure that comments by experts and governments are given appropriate consideration as the report develops.

As mentioned in our email to you of 16 December 2011, in order to have access to the Chapters and to submit review comments for consideration by the authors, all prospective expert reviewers of the WGI AR5 FOD are required to agree to the terms of the review, which specify that all materials provided for the review, including the chapter drafts, are considered confidential and shall not be cited, quoted or distributed.

A team of Lead Authors selected by the Working Group / or Task Force Bureaux prepares a draft that is circulated widely to experts and governments for a simultaneous government and expert review.

The authors of the WG1 report must submit their first order drafts around middle November for inclusion in the First Order report that must be ready for expert review by Dec 16.

Support services such as the need for experts in litigation, and electronic discovery, particularly its «review» stage, and the drafting of various specialized texts, could be made available at cost.

It can involve initial meetings or calls with clients to discuss a case and its prospects, drafting pleadings, considering prior art (earlier publications that can be used to invalidate a patent), reviewing documents to determine whether they are relevant and need to be disclosed, preparing a product or process description with the client (which involves drafting a detailed description of the product or process that is alleged to be infringing), meetings with experts, conferences with counsel to discuss and prepare the case for trial, and obviously days in court.

For example: «Draft interrogatory requests; telephone conference with Dr. Brown re: expert report; summarize deposition of Mr. Smith; review and revise correspondence to opposing counsel.

In light of this change in the role of the expert witness under the new rule, I conclude that counsel's practice of reviewing draft reports should stop.

The amendment allows attorneys and experts to exchange draft opinions for review and discussion without fear of the consequence of the production of such communications.

Ontario litigators breathed a sigh of relief last Thursday when the Court of Appeal overturned a trial judge's ruling that it was improper for a lawyer to review and discuss draft expert reports with an expert witness, and that such discussions must be documented and disclosed to an opposing party.

Many lawyers regard the changes to Rule 53 as an opportunity to review and discuss draft or preliminary reports with experts prior to the completion of the final report.

During cross-examination, the defendant's expert, Dr. Taylor, indicated he had sent a draft of one of his reports to the appellant's counsel for review.

Juniors had «drafted pleadings, did discovery document review, and then started on expert reports, working to prepare them for deposition.»

Unbundling is going to increase for two reasons: 1) it lends itself to more affordable fixed pricing and convenient delivery and 2) almost all of these many legal tech startups that are cropping up involve the practice of unbundling either by providing it themselves through their tech platforms with expert systems or doc automation or by the lawyers who participate in their branded networks to deliver unbundled services in the form of guidance, advice, strategy, review, drafting, etc..

The leadership team developed an initial draft, and then worked with a variety of experts to review and improve the document.

The literature review and expert advice were used to design a draft Gambling Participation Instrument that: