Sentences with phrase «review drafts of the report»

«Most researchers would not find [the proposed rules] a great departure from what they're already doing,» says Columbia University bioterrorism expert Stephen Morse, who reviewed a draft of the report.

We would like to thank David Rosenberg, partner at Education Resource Strategies, who reviewed a draft of this report and provided valuable comments that strengthened the framing and policy recommendations.

We would like to thank Austin Nichols, principal associate at ABT Associates, Johanna Lacoe, researcher at Mathematica, and Dorothyjean Cratty, independent research consultant, who each reviewed a draft of this report and provided valuable comments that strengthened the framing and interpretations.

The author would like to thank Andrea Luecke and Samantha Jacoby of the Solar Foundation and Justin Baca of the Solar Energy Industries Association for their support of this project and for reviewing a draft of this report.

Not exact matches

We are «concerned that these major findings are presented ambiguously within the Executive Summary and are inconsistent with the observations, data, and levels of uncertainty presented and discussed in the body of the draft Assessment Report,» states the review.

Last month, the panel of 31 independent scientists charged with reviewing the EPA's draft report stated that the agency's broad conclusion about the mining technique known as fracking is at odds with the evidence and «inconsistent with the observations, data, and levels of uncertainty presented.»

After its initial passage, the draft was further reviewed by the Council of State, an advisory body reporting to Thailand's prime minister on legislative matters, before final approval by the Cabinet again on Tuesday last week, according to a local Thailand media outlet, the Bangkok Post.

A draft presidential memorandum at the end of the document that could be used to order the review of NAFTA orders the report to pay «extra consideration to the effects such a policy change may have on the middle class, manufacturing and service sector workers, and foreign direct investment into the United States.»

The draft Pentagon report cautioned that one of the factors hindering U.S. government regulation was that many Chinese investments fall short of outright acquisitions that can trigger a CFIUS review.

Primary Opinion, the ASX company that paid $ 15 million for its stake last year, revealed on Thursday it was reviewing the carrying value of the business after scrutinising draft financial reports.

The competition regulator should be stripped of its control over the pricing and access terms of Telstra's wholesale phone and internet services, according to the draft report of the Harper Review.

There has been plenty of media on the Harper Review's draft report released last Monday - including two items in today's AFR: Kate Walsh, «Lawyers see green light for mergers in Harper review» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, page 15) and an opinion piece by former Competition Minister, Craig Emerson: «There are ill - effects in an effects test» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, Review's draft report released last Monday - including two items in today's AFR: Kate Walsh, «Lawyers see green light for mergers in Harper review» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, page 15) and an opinion piece by former Competition Minister, Craig Emerson: «There are ill - effects in an effects test» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, review» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, page 15) and an opinion piece by former Competition Minister, Craig Emerson: «There are ill - effects in an effects test» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, Review, 30 September 2014, page 15) and an opinion piece by former Competition Minister, Craig Emerson: «There are ill - effects in an effects test» (The Australian Financial Review, 30 September 2014, Review, 30 September 2014, p 58).

The third batch of submissions on the Harper Competition Review Draft Report have now been published on the Review website.

See, for example, Andrew White, «Industry super slaps big bank bundling» (The Australian, 25 November 2014) and, «ADF calls for mandatory code» (The Australian Dairy Farmer, 26 November 2014), «Minter Ellison announces general support of Harper Review draft report» (The Lawyer, 21 November 2014)

The first batch of 128 non-confidential submissions on the Harper Review Draft Report were released yesterday.

A Civilian Complaint Review Board report on the use of Tasers by the New York Police Department was scrubbed of language highlighting a central finding in an earlier - circulated draft report: that in most Taser encounters reviewed, officers used the stun guns on unarmed people.

In a joint response to the report dated Oct. 16, Champlain Supervisor Larry Barcomb, Champlain Mayor Greg Martin and Rouses Point Mayor Daniel Letourneau said they have drafted a new inter-municipal agreement, which is in the process of being revised by each respective board and will be reviewed annually.

Asked about the state's exchanges with USGS and the effect they had on the final report, a spokeswoman provided the following statement: «While the report was drafted by USGS, it simply underwent a technical review by NYSERDA staff and other experts, including experts from other state agencies like the Department of Environmental Conservation.

Draft conflict of interest regulations issued last summer include «paid authorship» in a list of activities that NIH grantees must report to their institutions for review.

In a draft of the first Review Report for the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), the staff of the California Air Resources Board (ARB) notes that the harmonization of LCFS programs globally will be important «for ensuring that global GHG emission reductions actually result from these programs».

Traditionally, GAO provides drafts of its reports to whatever agency it is reviewing so the agency can present its viewpoint.

The Expert Review of the First Order Draft of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) will take place from 4 May until 29 June 2018.

Film Review by Kam Williams Headline: Documentary Gives Glimpses of The Greatest in ’73 & «74 In 1966, Muhammad Ali refused to report to an Army induction center when he was drafted to fight in Vietnam, explaining: «I ain't got no quarrel with them Viet Cong.

A 21 - member group tasked with reviewing the appropriateness of Connecticut's statewide mastery examination reviewed a draft report today prepared by the State Department of Education (SDE) outlining several findings and recommendations.

The Dept. of Education has already sent draft guidelines to the Office of Management and Budget for review, Education Week reports.

A middle school social studies teacher notes that the quality of her students» research reports has markedly improved since he began using the writing process approach of brainstorming, drafting, reviewing feedback, and revising.

Reviewing not only the budget process, but also the State of the District Report and the draft Equity Report, it is clear that there is much room for improvement.

Since 2013, the subcommittee has orchestrated several successes and positive outcomes, some of which include: • Collaborating with the PIJAC Zoonosis committee to update the Healthy Herp Handling poster promoting healthy reptile and amphibian handling practices; develop the Zoonotic Disease Prevention Series for Retailers; draft informative store signage on how to prevent zoonotic diseases; participate in meetings on rodent and reptile disease transmission with the Centers for Disease Control; and produce and revise best management practices (BMP) documents; • Collaborating with the United States Association of Reptile Keepers on past and current attempts to pass legislation, ordinances, and regulatory activity that may impact herp ownership and related businesses; • Attending Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) meetings with reports and summary of actions affecting import and export of reptiles; • Addressing the 2013 Center for Biological Diversity petition to list 53 herp species under the Endangered Species Act; • Reviewing and commenting on the recent US Fish and Wildlife status review on the proposal to list wood turtles under the Endangered Species Act; • Submitting comments on proposed listing of flat - tailed tortoise and spider tortoise under the Endangered Species Act; • Introducing federal legislation in 2013 to allow for the export of certain constrictors listed as injurious in air shipments with aircraft that land in a state for refueling; • Providing volunteer support for auctions at 2013 National Reptile Breeders Expo and several North American Reptile Breeders Conferences; • Providing extensive consultation on constrictor caging standards in Ohio.

The present AR4 - WGI process started back in April 2004 when the author teams of the report were selected and the Lead Authors first met in September in Italy to launch the composition of the «zero order draft» which was subsequently submitted to the Technical Support Unit (TSU) for an informal review by invited experts (mostly well - known scientists).

British environmental and human rights group Global Witness broadly welcome the ADB's draft report on the review of Cambodia's forest concessions.

EPA's draft report contains quantitative scientific data (including over 950 sources of information, published papers, numerous technical reports, information from stakeholders and peer - reviewed EPA scientific reports) that support existing language saying that there is no widespread, systemic impact on the quality of drinking water.

Troubled and opaque Administration review process is a harbinger of problems for the Fourth National Climate Assessment By Nicky Sundt CSPW Senior Fellow A final draft of a key federal report on the science behind climate change has been leaked... Continue reading →

DOE had reviewed and approved two earlier drafts of the report, once at the end of the Obama Administration and the other under the Trump Administration.

It is a «significantly more ambitious effort than previous assessments» in terms of scope and the extent to which the public was engaged, according to the National Resource Council's review of a draft copy of the report.

Between this email (22 Sep 1999) and the next draft sent out (Nov 1999, Fig. 2.25 Expert Review) two things happened: (a) the email referring to a «trick» to «hide the decline» for the preparation of report by the World Meteorological Organization was sent (Jones 0942777075.txt, «trick» is apparently referring to a splicing technique used by the L.A. [Dr Mann] in which non-paleo data were merged to massage away a cooling dip at the last decades of the original Hockey Stick) and (b) the cooling portion of Briffa's curve had been truncated for the IPCC report (it is unclear as to who performed the truncation...)

Boykoff and the other 4 reviewers were asked to review a draft report that totaled more than 21,000 words, drew upon hundreds of citations to past studies and resources, and that features 23 Tables and 12 Figures worth of complex data and information.

However, even though he had several serious criticisms of the draft report, and gave quite detailed reviews explaining his concerns, nothing was done in the final report to address these concerns:

John McLean (an IT professional from Melbourne, Australia) has carried out an analysis of the Second Order Draft review comments for the Working Group 1 report.

I believe that WG1 review comments (with names of reviewers), and the author responses, will be published when the full copy - edited report comes out in January, along with the First and Second Order Drafts of the chapters — this will enable people to see what the comments referred to, and how the authors addresses those comments.

Any expert can sign up to review the drafts, making the IPCC report process one of the most open and inclusive in the world of science.»

(Alec Rawls) I participated in «expert review» of the Second Order Draft of AR5 (the next IPCC report), Working Group 1 («The Scientific Basis»), and am now making the full draft available to the puDraft of AR5 (the next IPCC report), Working Group 1 («The Scientific Basis»), and am now making the full draft available to the pudraft available to the public.

I would like to emphasize that the whole process of preparation of IPCC Reports is characterized by discussion which takes place within and across author teams and a rigorous process of review which serves the purpose of incorporating diverse points of view at various stages of drafting of the report.»

Draft reports are then reviewed by experts who were not authors of the report.

To develop the SAP 3.1, DOE chartered a Federal Advisory Committee comprised of 29 members drawn from academia, government scientists, non-profit and for - profit organizations that drafted and oversaw the review of the report in accordance with the CCSP guidelines.

The Task Group noted that clear guidance is needed on what the rules are for the confidentiality of draft reports and other documentation during drafting and review.

In its two Draft Reports sent to external scientific review, while IPCC mostly evaded the problem, its perfunctory assessment of the developing discrepancy between models and observations, such as it was, included major errors and misrepresentations, all tending in the direction of minimizing the issue.

A spokesman at the White House's Council on Environmental Quality says the addition of the citation to Dr. Soon's paper to the draft report was suggested during an interagency review process overseen by the White House.

During the first review, First Order Drafts are widely circulated to independent experts all over the world that have significant expertise and / or publications in particular areas of the report, and to experts nominated earlier by governments and participating organizations.

As we've already seen (here and here), at least four key sections in Carlin's review of the EPA draft endangerment finding, not to mention his central premise, were lifted nearly whole from Pat Michaels» World Climate Report climate disinformation blog, without any attribution whatsoever.

Responding to the request of the Northern Civil Society observer (Global Witness) to review the process of drafting decisions related to National Programmes, the co-Chairs proposed to summarize the decisions made by consensus at the conclusion of each session and recap all decisions at the end of the meeting, before they would be reproduced in the draft report.