Sentences with phrase «review editors from»

About 830 Authors and Review Editors from over 80 countries were selected to form the Author teams that produced the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5).

More than 800 authors and review editors from 85 countries are participating in the preparation of the AR5.

Not exact matches

After dropping out of a PhD program at Duke University to, in his own words «pursue a life of thought - crime,» Spencer worked as an editor at a variety of right - leaning publications including Taki's Magazine, American Conservative, and the National Review, and was fired from the latter two for his extreme and racist views.

I'm not inclined to argue with that judgment by Adam Wolfson, executive editor of the Public Interest, who is reviewing To Empower People: From State to Civil Society (edited by Michael Novak, AEIPress).

• «The road from Stonewall, June 1969, to Stonewall, June 2011, was a trajectory of greater social acceptance of difference and nonconformity,» writes National Review's deputy managing editor on the magazine's website, describing the scene the night New York approved homosexual «marriage» at the famous gay bar where the riot that started the homosexual rights movement began.

I also wish to thank the editors of Judaism, The Journal of Bible and Religion, The Review of Religion, The Journal of Religion, and The Review of Metaphysics for permission to use materials from articles published in those journals.

He is editor of Cultural Wars in American Politics: Critical Reviews of a Popular Myth (Aldine de Gruyter, 1997), from which this article is adapted.

From the admirable editor of the Review of Applied Philosophy, this is terribly thin gruel.

She earned her law degree from the Southwestern University School of Law and graduated Cum Laude, was an Associate Editor for the Law Review, and on the Dean's List, and began her legal career as a law clerk for Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle, United States District Court, Los Angeles, and as an associate at the prestigious law firm of Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP.

JS revised the review in response to feedback from referees and the editor.

It was Robert Silvers, the well - respected editor of The New York Review of Books, who urged Judt to expand his intellectual horizons: he «taught me in spite of myself that I really could do this sort of writing; that I could think and comment upon subjects far removed from my formal scholarly concerns.

ENDS Notes to Editors UK Alcohol duty context For a short video summary of the issues around alcohol pricing, please visit: https://vimeo.com/191959217 Following heavy lobbying from the alcohol industry, the last four Budgets have seen real terms cuts in alcohol duty Alcohol is 60 % more affordable than it was in 1980 — the alcohol duty escalator, introduced in 2008, which ensured that duty rose above inflation, helped mitigate this trend, but this progress has reversed since the duty escalator was scrapped in 2013 In real terms, spirits duty has halved, and wine duty fallen by a quarter since 1978 - 9 The Government estimates suggest that the duty cuts since 2013 will cost the Exchequer # 2.9 billion over four years The University of Sheffield estimated that an additional 6,500 people would be hospitalised each year as a result of the alcohol duty cuts in 2015 The report The report was peer reviewed by academic experts the fields of economics, public health and public policy prior to publication.

Notes to Editors The report, «How alcohol industry organisations mislead the public about alcohol and cancer», by Mark Petticrew, Nason Maani Hessari, Cécile Knai and Elisabete Weiderpass, will be published online in Drug and Alcohol Review at 22:00 6 September 2017 The Institute of Alcohol Studies is an independent institute bringing together evidence, policy and practice from home and abroad to promote and informed debate on alcohol's impact on society.

He received his bachelor's degree from State University of New York at Albany and his Juris Doctor from Brooklyn Law School, where he was articles editor of the Law Review.

His subsequent publishing career has included positions as founding editor of the international monthly review journal, Trends in Ecology & Evolution from 1986 until 1999.

Yet for some reason the Physical Review editors omitted the Oppenheimer - Snyder paper from their list, verifying that no such list is ever complete, even if you have dozens of items instead of only 10.

However, as an editor I am surrounded by the latest scientific breakthroughs in many areas, and there is a tremendous feeling of satisfaction in nurturing a paper from a study that has some weaknesses to one which gains strength through the review and editorial process.

He was formerly a contributing editor at Columbia Journalism Review, where he covered science, environment, and medical news as a staff writer from 2006 until 2013.

DeWitt was the acting editor for a section of the July 1957 issue of Reviews of Modern Physics containing proceedings from a physics conference that he and I had organized in January of that year (he was not the regular editor of the journal).

As ScienceInsider reported on Thursday, the journal's editor, Graham Parker, retracted the paper on 21 July after it was discovered that several paragraphs in the introduction had been copied, without attribution, from a 2007 review article.

Science editors make these initial screening decisions with advice from the Board of Reviewing Editors, a group of more than 100 working scieeditors make these initial screening decisions with advice from the Board of Reviewing Editors, a group of more than 100 working scieEditors, a group of more than 100 working scientists.

* Editor's note: The author worked at BioMed Central from September 2012 until June 2014, but had no involvement with patient peer review or the new journal.

Editors from the other 20 had e-mailed the fictitious corresponding authors stating that the paper was still under review; those, too, are excluded from this analysis.

At least once each year the Board will review the state of the journal and will receive a comprehensive report from the Editor - in - Chief, including the views of the Editorial Board.

Held on Saturday 20 February from 11 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. in the San Diego Marriott Hotel Marina Ballroom G, the Science editor will explore the manuscript submission procedure including the review, approval, and publication process, and describe what kind of submissions best suited for a specialty journal.

Our clients include, amongst others, Chief Scientific Advisers; senior EU scientific officials; representatives of national governments, academies and agencies; prominent business leaders; stakeholders from pan-European scientific organisations and membership groups; science media and senior editors from peer - reviewed journals; and various talking - heads from internationally renowned research facilities.

Submissions from editors or members of the editorial board are assigned to other unrelated editors or editorial board members who will ensure unbiased review and decision.

Reviews and opinions published in TiPS are usually invited by the editor, but we welcome suggestions from the community as well.

All articles are invited by the Editor from leading researchers in the field and undergo stringent peer - review to ensure they are accurate and authoritative.

The editorial includes a list of «actions we have taken to prevent citation stacking from recurring and to further strengthen the transparency of the review process» — including monitoring editors and showing authors how to report suspicious conduct.

If the action editors are suitably qualified, they ought to be able to identify suitable reviewers for themselves, and suggesting reviewers is likely to lead to friendly review of weak papers by reviewers that also suffer from the same misunderstandings.

Her previous service includes the Editor - in - Chief of the Cancer Genetics PDQ Editorial Board at the National Cancer Institute from 2001 to 2005, and the Board of Directors for the American Society of Human Genetics, a past - President of the Board of Directors of the American Board of Medical Genetics and past - Chair of the Residency Review Committee for Medical Genetics (ACGME).

Before I start off with the review let me state that this review is from the point of view of my husband who was more than happy to try to product, but not so keen to write the review; he said he would rather be the editor and do the job of typing away to me.

Joining me this week is fellow blogger and TOH Volunteer Food Editor Maureen from Red Cottage Chronicles who is sharing her review of an easy TOH recipe for Apple Roly - Poly!

These flat irons and straightening brushes — including everyday picks, travel must - haves and all - star investment pieces — got rave reviews from our Beauty Lab, beauty editors and thoughtful reviewers across the internet.

Read our interracial site reviews from our real users and editors and compare the pros and cons of such websites.

If you are making the site different from others, just check the reviews by editor.

Navigate the wild world of apps with help from our editors who test, review, rate and rank the best apps for kids.

The game also received the Editor's Choice Award from IGN and GameSpy upon final review of the finished product.

About Blog It publishes original articles, both research and review articles, case reports, editorials, «letters to the editor», abstracts from international and national conferences and symposia, in all fields relevant to sports medicine, including sports orthopedics, sports medicine, sports nutrition, sport psychology, drugs in sports (doping), exercise science, physical activity (exercise) and health.

We accept reviews and comments from both site editors and users who have been using BikerPlanet.

Find your best race partner from the given reviews of verified top interracial relationships dating sites globally written by the editor's choice.

Meanwhile, the detailed review from editor helps you get to know more of the site you choose.

Read the Reviews from Biker Editors and the Comments from Real Biker Users

After learning more about STD dating from the Herpes People Meet Editor Review, you have the option of creating your own profile on the right website, adding photos and writing a little bit about yourself so that others can start contacting you sooner rather than later.One of the ways in which these...

After learning more about STD dating from the Herpes People Meet Editor Review, you have the option of creating your own profile on the right website, adding photos and writing a little bit about yourself so that others can start contacting you sooner rather than later.

Read those interracial sites reviews from editors and real users, then compare advantages and disadvantages of those websites.

On a scale of Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor, Days of Heaven rates: Movie: Excellent Video: Excellent Sound: Excellent Supplements: Commentary with editor Billy Weber, art director Jack Fisk, costume designer Patricia Norris, casting director Dianne Crittenden; audio interview with Richard Gere; video interviews with Haskell Wexler, John Bailey, Sam Shepard; essay by Adrian Martin and a reprinted chapter from Néstor Almendros» autobiography Packaging: Keep case Reviewed: October 23, 2007

So without further ado, reviews from reviewer Gabe Toro, podcast editor Erik McClanahan and Rodrigo Perez below.

[Editor's Note: this quotation and score are from the original GameSpot review.