Sentences with phrase «review grey literature»

Neither is BEST a review of the hockey stick data, just the earth surface temps according to weather station sighting, rather than proxies, and yet the BBC have claimed that this non-peer review grey literature (as it is at this time) is conclusive proof of ALL AGW alarmist claims.

Not exact matches

The IPCC must urgently review its policies for hiring lead authors — and I would have thought that not only should biased «grey literature» be rejected, but campaigners from NGOs should not be allowed to join the lead author group and thereby review their own work.

That's why a lot of people are now trying to sell the idea that the IAC review has called for an outright ban on grey literature.

To accept a role for grey literature at the IPCC, provided it is properly and critically assessed by the authors, is not to say that peer - reviewed publications should not dominate the assessments.

According to Pielke: «I have noticed recently a number of peer - reviewed papers that reference so - called «grey literature» (e.g., agency, company, NGO reports) which hasn't itself been peer reviewed.

Then the peer - reviewed study that cites the grey literature is subsequently cited in another publication to refer to the information in the original non-peer reviewed source.

Despite vigorous protests from its own expert reviewers, 42 % of the documents cited in one chapter of the climate bible are grey literature rather than peer - reviewed.

As we've seen over the last couple of years, many of the more outlandish and alarmist claims in the IPCC reports have been based not on peer - reviewed science, but on «grey literature» — the propaganda sheets and press releases distributed by fanatical green NGOs (many of which are part - funded by the European Commission — but that's another story).

Haven't heard about all the «grey literature» which your noble IPCC accepts as «peer - reviewed» huh?

There is a big difference between a private company employing a leading expert, and the IPCC employing a political activist who reviewed and published his own work grey literature (non peer reviewed) which amounted to little more than an advert for his own industry and by doing so helped push the IPCC's political agenda and fill his own bank balance, but also failed to provide any independent scientific evidence of a way forward.

IPCC authors added a grey envelope around the AR4 envelope, presumably to give rhetorical support for their false claim about models and observations; however, this envelope did not occur in AR4 or any peer reviewed literature.

From the caption to Figure 2 in SM's headpost: «IPCC authors added a grey envelope around the AR4 envelope, presumably to give rhetorical support for their false claim about models and observations; however, this envelope did not occur in AR4 or any peer reviewed literature.»

To come up with the findings, Modernel and colleagues analysed 242 papers, both peer reviewed and grey literature, published between 1945 and mid-2015.

«A citizens audit of the IPCC study found that 5,587 cited references, nearly a third of all sources, were not peer - reviewed publications, but rather «grey literature,» such as press releases, newspaper and magazine articles, discussion papers, masters and PhD theses, working papers and advocacy literature published by environmental groups,» Sensenbrenner said.

Enhanced guidance on the use of «grey literature» — material not published in peer - reviewed scientific journals — has also been drawn up, and will be finalised by chairs of the IPCC's working groups in the coming months.

To make things worse, NO book or report published by a genuine publishing agency is actually considered «grey» literature, regardless of whether there is any peer review or not -LRB-!).

Dr Lal said: «We knew the WWF report with the 2035 date was «grey literature» [material not published in a peer - reviewed journal].

Peer - reviewed, published literature will be searched as well as grey literature.

In order to evaluate the evidence for ST in the treatment of recurrent and chronic depression we conducted a systematic review of the peer - reviewed literature using bibliographic databases, grey literature, hand search and expert consultation (Prospero register: CRD42016039914).

Finally, the inclusion criteria for this review means some potential articles may have been excluded, such as grey literature and studies published in languages other than English.