Sentences with phrase «review in scientific research»

It is a routine part of lesson planning for Japanese teachers, but in Lesson Study it is done with an extra intensity, analogous to a literature review in scientific research.

Following an enquiry into peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.

Following an inquiry into peer review in scientific research, U.K. parliamentarians have concluded that, despite many criticisms and little evidence of its effectiveness, the traditional practice of having research articles evaluated by anonymous colleagues before publication is valued by the community and shouldn't be completely abandoned.

Not exact matches

The no - holds - barred piece draws on recent research published in Teaching and Teacher Education, as well as older reviews of the scientific literature on so - called digital natives, to review whether the recent mania for tech in education has solid scientific foundations.

Additionally, while this research was presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions in Anaheim, California, a few days ago, it has yet to be presented in a peer - reviewed journal.

The budget is also expected to include a major financial boost to basic scientific research across Canada, which would address some of the concerns outlined last year in a national review of the state of fundamental science.

«Our researchers have been publishing such research since 2013 in major peer - reviewed scientific journals, and these studies have been reported widely in international media.

I'm sure you've done plenty of rigorous scientific research in the lab and in the field, published articles in peer - reviewed scientific journals, and are widely recognized as one of the leading members of your particular field.

It was conceived in a broad, encyclopedic attempt to review the life and growth of society; it was determined by the interest in an application of «scientific» methods («laws») to sociohistorical phenomena including religious ideas and institutions (theory of stages of development), and finally by the endeavor to include the material gathered in anthropological and ethnological research.

Co., 1978); Thomas C. Campbell and Yoshio Fukuyama, The Fragmented Layman: An Empirical Study of Lay Attitudes (Philadelphia: Pilgrim Press, 1970); James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as an Independent Variable,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 11 (1972): 65 - 75; James D. Davidson, «Religious Belief as a Dependent Variable,» Sociological Analysis 33 (1972): 81 - 94; James D. Davidson, «Patterns of Belief at the Denominational and Congregational Levels,» Review of Religious Research 13 (1972): 197 - 205; David R. Gibbs, Samuel A. Miller, and James R. Wood, «Doctrinal Orthodoxy, Salience and the Consequential Dimension,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 12 (1973): 33 - 52; William McKinney, and others, Census Data for Community Mission (New York: Board for Homeland Ministries, United Church of Christ, 1983), part of a denomination - wide study of census data relevant to each congregation in the United Church of Christ; David O. Moberg, `' Theological Position and Institutional Characteristics of Protestant Congregations: An Explanatory Study,» Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 9 (1970): 53 - 58; Wade Clark Roof, Community and Commitment; Thomas Sweetser, The Catholic Parish: Shifting Membership in a Changing Church (Chicago: Center for the Scientific Study of Religion, 1974).

The report had its origins in an article published by the World Wildlife Federation that was not peer - reviewed but that the IPCC accepted uncritically as scientific research.

As a nutritionist with an MS and BS in Clinical Nutrition, Eat Drink Shrink was founded on the belief that current nutrition information backed by scientific research, innovative plant based recipes, and product reviews / samples, should be accessible to all under one domain.

HFAC's 28 - member Scientific Committee has spent nearly two years reviewing all of the current research, which has resulted in new standards for the Certified Humane label.

Research is found in peer reviewed scientific journals and obviously you have no clue what the actual scientific evidence shows.

An expert consultation was convened to review the scientific evidence on the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding, formulate recommendation for practice on the optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding and develop recommendation for research need in this area.

Evidence Basis for the Ten Steps of Mother - Friendly Care in the Journal of Perinatal Education, 2007, Issue 16, a Special Supplement The result of a 2 - year research project by a team of maternity care experts, this important work reviews 15 years worth of scientific studies which and found that the evidence supports complying with each aspect of the ten steps of Mother - Friendly Care.

In addition to the quarterly peer reviewed Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health (JOPPPAH), the official scientific publication of APPPAH, we publish the APPPAH Newsletter and hold regional and international conferences, promote research, serve the public with valuable directories and resources, and work to enhance the pregnancy experience and maximize the health of both mothers and babies.

«Strength training, when done correctly, can improve the overall health of children and adolescents of all athletic abilities,» says Katherine Stabenow Dahab, MD, who did a comprehensive review of scientific research on the topic (published in the journal Sports Health).

A physician who allegedly conducted human brain - activity experiments on people associated with the NXIVM corporation has apparently not published a scientific study in years and there is no indication his private research was being overseen by an independent review board, according to a medical expert and records of the NIH and U.S. National Library of Medicine.

The United States has «got to protect our rigorous peer review system and ensure that we only fund proposals that promise the biggest bang for taxpayer dollars... [And] make sure that our scientific research does not fall victim to political maneuvers or agendas that in some ways would impact on the integrity of the scientific process.»

[BOX 5] Alliance of Third Class Non-Profit Mailers, 1981 - 1982 Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs (OES) files I, 1981 II, 1980 - 1981 III, 1978 - 1980 IV, 1979 - 1980 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1969 - 1981 Council of Allied Engineering and Scientific Societies, 1981 - 1982 Department of Education, 1977 - 1978 Energy Research Advisory Board Multiprogram Laboratory Panel, 10/15/81 -11 / 19/82 Institute of Medicine - I, 1982 - 1983 Institute of Medicine - II, 1979 - 1982 Roger W. Jones Award, 1979 - 1980 W. K. Kellogg Foundation, 1982 Mellon (Andrew W.) Project, 1978 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: I, 1981 - 1984 National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) Files: II, 1981 - 1982 National Committee on Public Employee Pension Systems (PEPS), July 1982 National Governors» Association Meeting - Task Force on Technological Innovation, 2/21/82 National Publication Act of 1979 Office of Technology Assessment, 1972 - 1973 Peace and Conflict Resolution, 1980 Pensions for Professionals, 1971 - 1972 Saturday Review of Science, 1972 - 1979 Scientists and Engineers Emigrant Fund, 1978 - 1979 SOHIO, Standard Oil of Ohio Grant, 1982 - 1986 Technology in Science - Advisory Board, 1981 Tyler Prize, 1984 - 1985 White House Study of Science and Engineering Education, 1980 Znaiye (Soviet Scholarly Society), 1971 - 1977

As associate professor and first - author Johan Bollen writes in an e-mail to Science Careers, they wanted their new system to «enable scientists to set their own priorities, fund scientists... not projects, avoid proposal writing and reviewing, avoid administrative burdens, encourage all scientists to participate collectively in the definition of scientific priorities, encourage innovation, reward scientists that make significant contributions to data, software, methods, and systems, avoid funding death spirals (no funding - > no research - > no funding) but still reward high levels of productivity, create the proper incentives for scholarly communication (publishing to communicate, not to improve bibliometrics), enable funding of daring and risky research, and so on.»

In «From funding agencies to scientific agency: Collective allocation of science funding as an alternative to peer review,» the researchers proposed a funding model that they claim would be simpler, cheaper, and fairer than the traditional funding system, and more amenable to high - risk research and chance discovery.

In reviewing videos, Shanley «learned that a focus on the personal stories of the citizen science volunteers themselves, and what motivated them to contribute to scientific research, made for a much more compelling story than a strict focus on the science.»

The program provides expert peer review and guidance to academia, industry, foundations, and government agencies engaged in scientific research, development and innovation in the US and around the world.

«This departure not only contravenes the University's own policy of having at least one member with «primary professional expertise in a scientific field relevant to the type of research reviewed by that panel,» but also prompts concern about the quality of review.»

Each fellow prepares an abbreviated research proposal that is formally reviewed in a mock peer - review session facilitated by a retired scientific review administrator.

Science Watch, a review of the Web research tool Essential Science Indicators, found a decline in U.S. representation among the world's published scientific papers, dropping from 38.5 percent in 1990 to 33.3 percent in 2004.

Founded in 1880 with the support of American inventor Thomas Edison, Science has grown to become the world's leading publication for cutting - edge research, scientific news, and commentary, with the largest paid circulation of any peer - reviewed general - science journal.

In response, a spokesperson for Nature, which published the papers being scrutinised (DOI: 10.1038 / nature12968; DOI: 10.1038 / nature12969), says: «The editors select research for publication on the basis of scientific significance, and each published paper undergoes robust, rigorous peer review.

From her office in North Carolina's Research Triangle Park, Birnbaum is well - aware of the health effects of traffic exhaust after reviewing scientific evidence.

In a 2006 review of 842 scientific papers on omega - 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease, a research team based at the TuftsNew England Medical Center in Boston concluded that only EPA and DHA seemed beneficial — ALA, their plant - produced precursor, was noIn a 2006 review of 842 scientific papers on omega - 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease, a research team based at the TuftsNew England Medical Center in Boston concluded that only EPA and DHA seemed beneficial — ALA, their plant - produced precursor, was noin Boston concluded that only EPA and DHA seemed beneficial — ALA, their plant - produced precursor, was not.

Although Milgram's tests upset some volunteers, most participants identified with his scientific mission to understand human behavior and wanted to prove themselves as worthy of the project, Haslam and psychologist Stephen Reicher of the University of St. Andrews in Fife, Scotland, conclude in a research review scheduled to appear in the 2017 Annual Review of Law and Social Screview scheduled to appear in the 2017 Annual Review of Law and Social ScReview of Law and Social Science.

But they say Hare's use of legal threats has at best subverted the peer review process that is the crux of modern scientific progress, and could at worst encourage junior researchers in the field of forensic psychology to pursue other lines of research.

► Also on Wednesday, Christina Larson wrote that, at the Global Research Council meeting Monday in Beijing, Chinese science leaders «threw their weight behind plans to embrace open access and Western norms of scientific conduct, including a plea from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) for more rigorous evaluation and peer review.»

With this issue in mind, a team of American researchers reviewed the available scientific literature and suggested four important considerations to maximize the clinical impact of future research regarding adolescent depression symptoms and substance use.

NTU's research findings were published recently in AMB Express, a peer - reviewed scientific journal in the area of applied and industrial microbiology by SpringerOpen.

So, the research team introduced a chronology developed by collecting established fossil dates reported in dozens of already - published and peer reviewed papers in an array of scientific journals.

The statement is based on a review of existing scientific research published in peer - reviewed medical journals that documents a strong association between adverse experiences in childhood and teen years and a greater likelihood of developing risk factors such as obesity, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes earlier than those not experiencing adverse experiences.

This groundbreaking research was published recently in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) online, a peer - reviewed scientific journal.

These issues are very much on the minds of policymakers and funding agency administrators... so much so that an explicit and measurable focus on training — scientific and soft skills — may well become a review criterion at NIH in the near future, even for pure research grants.

We are reviewing all bilateral engagement on a case by case basis, but believe it is in our interest to work together with Russia on scientific research.»

KNAW and other organizations praised its proposals to prioritize the country's scientific goals in a «National Research Agenda» to be produced next year, to reduce the pressure on scientists by putting quality over quantity in peer review and to boost large - scale research infrastResearch Agenda» to be produced next year, to reduce the pressure on scientists by putting quality over quantity in peer review and to boost large - scale research infrastresearch infrastructure.

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration cited O'Shaughnessy's research in the paper announcing its third discovery of gravitational waves that published in Physical Review Letters on June 1.

That paper, which appeared in the journal Critical Reviews in Toxicology, reviewed the IARC findings and concluded the scientific research didn't support claims that glyphosate posed a risk of genetic toxicity.

The 395 - page report is the work of an expert committee that considered more than 10,000 research abstracts in their review of the scientific literature on cannabis.

McNesby and his colleagues at the Army Research Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Los Alamos National Laboratory report their research this week in the journal Review of Scientific Instruments, from AIP PubResearch Laboratory, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and Los Alamos National Laboratory report their research this week in the journal Review of Scientific Instruments, from AIP Pubresearch this week in the journal Review of Scientific Instruments, from AIP Publishing.

A survey by Roach and Sauermann of more than 400 graduate students at three Research I universities shows that some of the aspiring researchers do strongly possess what Sauermann and other researchers call «a taste for science,» which they define as a desire to do basic research, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific coResearch I universities shows that some of the aspiring researchers do strongly possess what Sauermann and other researchers call «a taste for science,» which they define as a desire to do basic research, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific coresearch, to determine the direction of one's projects, to publish in peer - reviewed journals, and to participate actively in the scientific community.

The report, titled «Knowledge, Networks and Nations: Global Scientific Collaboration in the 21st Century,» analyzes peer - reviewed science papers with abstracts in English to assess which countries were claiming slices of an expanding research pie.

Perhaps Shermer should go back and look at Scientific American's own coverage of fluoride [see «Second Thoughts about Fluoride,» by Dan Fagin; January 2008] or, better still, read the science in the 2006 National Research Council report «Fluoride in Drinking Water: A Scientific Review of EPA's Standards.»