Chris, your positive
review means a lot to us and we?re happy we could help you!
Taking the time to leave
this review means a lot to us.
As a consumer, seeing a personal thank - you note from an agent in response to
their review means a lot.
Not exact matches
- revfeed promotes binarytilt - «Scam or not»
review websites promote it, It would be fair to say some are written by binarytilt authors and some authors are just simply bribed (I
mean they're human) and binarytilt seems to have
lots of money.
Thanks for leaving a
review, it
means a
lot to me!
Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't
mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a
lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed
reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste
There will be a
lot of sections which do not
mean anything for people who are pros and then there are sections with
reviews of the baby walker of current times.
In an interview with J at the company's second annual media
review engagement in Accra, he noted that this development
means a
lot to the TOR as a company and also to the petroleum downstream sector of the country.
That
means it's a chemical that has not seen a
lot of safety
reviews.»
This recent
review in the journal Nutritional Neuroscience suggests that eating
lots of fruits and vegetables may present «a noninvasive, natural, and inexpensive therapeutic
means to support a healthy brain.»
So if you can take one minute out of your day to leave a positive
review on iTunes, it
means a
lot.
When I read the
reviews on Anthropologie a
lot of people noted that the top of the dress folds... and now I understand what they
meant.
The YouCanGetMe.com
review shows it has
lots of modern features such as «See Me», «Hear Me» and «Meet Me» services that allows the members of the site meet each other in cyber space by the
means of audio and video chat.
The lovehorse.co.uk has
lots of good
reviews online which
means that people are satisfied of what they uncover upon registering themselves at this dating site.
First of all, I'm going to make it clear from the start of my
review: a
lot, and I
mean the vast majority of reviewers, have given SCV a low
Well I see the vast majority
reviews hate this show, well it's better than a
lot of other now on TV... reality show, like the voice and living in the jungle like monkeys is a hole
lot worse, I
mean the necked ones, dating necked that hits a all time low or TV and
A.J. Maciejewski (crazyaejay): I understand what you
mean and I'm sorry if this sounds arrogant but completing this enormous game then
reviewing it is a
lot more than many other reviewers can say they did.
If you like my resources: it really
means a
lot if you take the time to leave a warm
review:)
It
meant a
lot to hear wonderful
reviews form someone that we didn't even know.
MINI Cooper S Convertible
Review Car Tested: 2016 MINI Cooper S Convertible; Road Test No. 714 Price OTR Mumbai: Rs. 45.40 lakhs The MINI Cooper S Convertible is a car
meant to make you feel special without splurging a
lot Imagine yourself as a person who has achieved a
lot in life, or has inherited... Read More
If you write a
lot of
reviews, people will begin to learn what your star ratings
mean.
A one - star
review doesn't
mean your work is awful, it just
means someone disliked it an awful
lot, and any passion you can incite is good passion (as long as they spell your name right).
That
means you need a group of people willing to
review your book early, OR you need to giveaway a
lot of free copies and hope some lead to
reviews.
It's important to either add some good
reviews or some social proof, «over 500
reviews» is a big deal — that
means a
lot of people are reading and liking Randall's work enough to leave
reviews.
They really don't do anything for me, not the way an amazing
review or
lots of sales (
meaning: readers) feels like success.
By this I
mean the old world of commercial publishing, supported by
lots of outlets that published professional
reviews, having to move over to make room for self - publishing authors dependent on non-professional reader - reviewers.
Not only do they make your book look more impressive (a large number of
reviews means that a
lot of people have read your book, so customers are more likely to try it for themselves), but also because Amazon tends to favor books with
lots of
reviews, putting them in lists and newsletters alongside similar books in each niche.
I think educating the public about what indie publishing really
means and the rise of
review blogs that cater to them and carry as much weight as places like Dear Author and Smart Bitches Trashy Books will go a
lot further toward informing the public what qualifies as a good read.
They feature mostly high value titles, which
means a
lot of sales and a
lot of
reviews.
So, anyway, if you did enjoy the novel, it would
mean a
lot to me if you could help out by posting
reviews for one or both of them — and it doesn't cost you a cent.
Also, while you're right to think that some of those free books are languishing on Kindles unread, some of them forever, that you received 77 new
reviews from the promotion (plus 10 since you wrote this post) that
means a
lot of people did read it.
Even a two or three star
review should
mean «There were a
lot of issues, but the book is still worth reading.»
Not only do they make your book look more impressive (a large number of
reviews means that a
lot of people have read your book, so customers are more likely to try it for themselves), but also because Amazon tends to favor books with
lots of revi...
Success over time would
mean creating a larger conversation about the books, expanding the audience for each author in the program, seeing
lots of
reviews up on detail pages, a
lot of Goodreads discussions, and, of course, a
lot of sales.
- revfeed promotes binarytilt - «Scam or not»
review websites promote it, It would be fair to say some are written by binarytilt authors and some authors are just simply bribed (I
mean they're human) and binarytilt seems to have
lots of money.
This
review is actually perfect because I've been
meaning to read a
lot of negotiation books because I go through a negotiation after 6 months of what my salary should be.
Taking a few moments to post a positive
review will be the best reward we can receive and will
mean a
lot to our practice.
The keys don't have a
lot of travel which
means they don't feel great, at least based on my own preferences, but typing out this
review was never an issue and my typing speed didn't suffer at all.
Sadly as we've discovered throughout this
review that also
means a
lot of Payday 2's flaws have transferred over, like the strange ability for German soldiers to walk through things.
What I
mean by that is, the first game was solid, the second game improved upon that and a
lot of the time the second game is the real deal, the third game usually get's
reviewed as «more of the same».
I
mean, you've got a very niche subgenre of games (the dungeon crawler RPG) that is a sequel to a game that did poorly (both in sales and
reviews) and that's up against a
lot of fierce competition (like the Etrian Odyssey series and Legend of Grimrock)-- that's just not a recipe for success.
I
mean lets
review, we've got Mario Kart 7, which a
lot of people still play, we've got Super Smash Bros 3DS, we've got both the (currently released) greatest AND (argulably) darkest 3D Zelda games, we've got a port / sequel of the greatest 2D Zelda game — Link to the Past, we've got Hyrule Warriors port which FAR surpasses the WiiU version and now we have this.
Skinny: Going back to the Star Wars well gives May some big name - brand glamor, but the Force Unleashed 2 was
reviewed more poorly than its predecessor and while Lego Star Wars: The Complete Saga
means what it says, it's a also a
lot of repetition and puzzle - solving.
Naturally, this
means I've got a
lot more
reviews to keep up with, too.
This one's bound to get rave
reviews, and hopefully that
means lots of you will play it.
However, our staffers have read a
lot of
reviews — and we
mean a
lot — and thus through experience are able to maintain consistency both from film to film and from reviewer to reviewer.
First I should clarify that I am not a car expert, nor have I been following Tesla's development over the years, which
means that my interaction with the Model S was, in a way, more objective than someone who knows a
lot about electric cars and may already love it; hence the «non-gearhead's
review.»
«but a slow shift
means the long - lived gases will have accumulated...» CO2 latency time in the atmosphere has been measured (not modeled) to be 5 - 7 years, with
lots of peer -
reviewed literature going back to the 1960's to support it.
However, I think that if peer
review actually
means what the public imagines it to, then a
lot of these problems would vanish.
I should clarify that I am not a car expert, nor have I been following Tesla's development over the years, which
means that my interaction with the Model S was, in a way, more objective than someone who knows a
lot about electric cars and may already love it; hence the «non-gearhead's
review.»