The biological roots of political conflict:
a review of Our political nature: The evolutionary origins of what divides us [by Avi Tuschman, Amherst, NY: Prometheus].
Not exact matches
Read a
review of Charles Wohlforth's «intellectual, philosophical» The Fate
of Nature Will present and future generations help protect our planet from neglect and abuse, or will the social and
political mechanisms
of the market economy win out?
Because the NRDC is a
political advocacy group there is some spin but it does list a variety
of studies from peer -
reviewed journals like Science and
Nature and from groups like the National Academy
of Science from 2000 to 2004 and its easier to have a lot
of papers on one site.
«IPCC reports combined with the tens
of thousands
of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading,
reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion
of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification
of the
nature of the social and
political issues — is just not credible.»
Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication
of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind
of effort «competes» with the work
of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens
of thousands
of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading,
reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion
of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification
of the
nature of the social and
political issues — is just not credible.
A chilling account
of the history is told in Valery N. Soyfer, «The Consequences
of Political Dictatorship for Russian Science,»
Nature Reviews Genetics, Vol.
Delvigne is an important judgment from the point
of view
of constitutional law, the
political nature of Union citizenship and the role played by the Court
of Justice in
reviewing increasingly large areas
of national law.
On the other hand, the Court found that if the Parliament finds the petition admissible, further actions taken are not amenable to judicial
review, because the Parliament has a broad discretion
of political nature as to how the petition is further dealt with, «regardless»
of whether the Parliament deals with the petition directly or further refers it to other competent authorities.