Sentences with phrase «review of a custody evaluation»
Tags: bad custody evaluation, bad custody evaluation report, biased custody evaluation, court order for custody evaluation, custody evaluation, custody evaluation guidelines, custody evaluation report, custody evaluator, referral questions, review of a custody evaluation report
http://blog.custodytrialconsultants.com/ Not exact matches
The reports produced were non-evaluative, meaning that, unlike the custody assessment and views of the child reports prepared by mental health professionals, they offered no analysis, commentary or evaluation, and required no testing, review of background materials or interviews with persons other than the child.
Dr. Evans is an approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists by the American Psychological Association and has been approved by many U.S. legal bar associations to conduct continuing legal education on a variety of topics, including Litigating Family Law Cases with Parent Alienation, and Critiquing and Reviewing Child Custody Evaluations.
As custody battles become rampant, critics reveal kids are sometimes put at risk when a state office is unable to review custody evaluations of psychologists.
Our staff is known for the expertise necessary to assist you and your legal team behind the scenes, through work product reviews of previously performed Social Investigations (Child Custody Evaluations), and expert witness testimony about specific topics important for the Court's consideration when making decisions pertaining to your family's specific needs.»
Some cases require the expertise and specialized knowledge about Parental Alienation, false allegations of abuse and treatment considerations for alienated children, peer review of child custody evaluations, etc..
Dr. Evans is an approved sponsor of continuing education for psychologists by the American Psychological Association and has been approved by over 11 legal bar associations in the U.S. to provide Continuing Legal Education to attorneys in the area of Parental Alienation, Reviewing and Critiquing Child Custody Evaluations and other topics.
The steps of a child custody evaluation typically include a parental history review, interviews, psychological testing, observed interactions between the parent and child, interviews with references, and follow - up interviews.
In custody and time sharing matters the role includes such functions as objective evaluations of families or individuals, with opinions communicated via testimony; peer reviews of the professional work products of other mental health professionals, opinions subsequently offered in court; and, summaries of research literature for the court such as in case - blind testimony.
On occasion, evaluations sometimes called «social investigations» can be ordered to determine timesharing issues including parenting plans (formerly called «child custody») can include home visits to meet the children, contacting individuals who know the family, reviewing medical / school records and perform psychological testing on all members of the families.
A more advanced review of the clinical data contained in the custody evaluation, however, can often reveal the «psychological fingerprints» of the child's control by a narcissistic / (borderline) parent.
I spend a lot of time reviewing custody evaluation reports and providing feedback to clients and their divorce attorneys.
In a subsection entitled, «When Victims Have a History of Physical Violence,» the guide instructs that such abuse cases, and especially those with «a history of police or criminal justice system involvement - almost always warrant a [custody] evaluation» to subject the history «to careful review and to supplementation.»
The listed unfair practices and subjective distortions of objective custody criteria are culled from recent literature and from reviewing 30 years of doing custody evaluations.
I'll explain how the common errors of evaluation bias, inappropriate uses of tests and failure to follow guidelines will help you understand and design successful trial strategies when reviewing and Critiquing Custody Evaluations or Parent Sharing Plans.
If parents are unable to agree regarding the sharing of the children in a litigated divorce case in court, the family frequently undergoes a costly custody evaluation process and may have their own «expert» to review the work of the expert conducting the evaluation.
Please select a video below to learn more about how the common errors of evaluation bias, inappropriate uses of tests, and failure to follow guidelines will help you understand and design successful trial strategies when reviewing and critiquing child custody evaluations and parent sharing plans.
Similar to custody evaluations, parental fitness evaluations may include interviews with parents and children, psychological testing, observations, review of records (health, academic, etc.), and interviewing collateral contacts such as teachers, daycare providers or family physicians.
Some researchers and custody evaluators have developed elaborate systems and tools for assessing PAS in the context of formal evaluations (e.g., Kelly & Johnston, 2005) and might be reviewed for appropriateness of therapeutic fit.