Britain's leading pregnancy service has called for
a review of abortion laws and for current restrictions requiring two doctors to authorise terminations to be changed.
Not exact matches
Thus would arise the argument I discussed (and criticized) in my
review: that the Constitution should be interpreted in light
of certain natural
law principles to require (not just allow) states to prohibit
abortion.
In 2007 the Committee used the same justification to attack Honduras» restrictive
abortion laws, recommending «that the State party consider
reviewing the
law relating to
abortion with a view to identifying circumstances under which
abortion could be permitted, such as therapeutic
abortions and
abortions in cases
of pregnancies resulting from rape or incest, and removing punitive provisions imposed on women who undergo
abortion, in line with the Committee's general recommendation 24...»
The pace
of expanding scientific knowledge is already producing a public demand for
reviewing policy more frequently: 95 per cent in the 2005 study felt
abortion law should be kept under regular
review, and 61 per cent agreed that
abortion law has not kept up with our knowledge
of early development in the womb.
Whereas legal thinkers once limited their most serious scholarship to
law review articles, occasionally nipping out into the dangerous world to write an op - ed, now many
of them offer off - the - cuff observations about everything from partial birth
abortion bans to their favorite CDs, several times daily.