Sentences with phrase «review of constitutional amendments»

Not exact matches

Florida's Water and Land Legacy Campaign announced Thursday that it has collected enough signatures of Florida voters to qualify for Supreme Court review in the hopes of getting its proposed constitutional amendment onto the 2014 ballot.

However, a review in 2013 in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review by Stuart Minor Benjamin indicated that the broad interpretation provided to speech under the First Amendment would require a significant reconceptioning of these constitutional principles if there was to be any extensive regulation of algorithms as proposed review in 2013 in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review by Stuart Minor Benjamin indicated that the broad interpretation provided to speech under the First Amendment would require a significant reconceptioning of these constitutional principles if there was to be any extensive regulation of algorithms as proposed Review by Stuart Minor Benjamin indicated that the broad interpretation provided to speech under the First Amendment would require a significant reconceptioning of these constitutional principles if there was to be any extensive regulation of algorithms as proposed by Wu.

In Ireland, where constitutional amendments are adopted by referendum, popular sovereignty prevails and no court «is competent to review or nullify a decision of the people».

On the other hand, the Hungarian Constitutional Court recently held that it it could review the procedural — but not substantive — regularity of an amendment; meanwhile the German Constitutional Court has affirmed its competence to assess both compliance with formal requirements and the substantive, entrenched constitutional principles of federalism and Constitutional Court recently held that it it could review the procedural — but not substantive — regularity of an amendment; meanwhile the German Constitutional Court has affirmed its competence to assess both compliance with formal requirements and the substantive, entrenched constitutional principles of federalism and Constitutional Court has affirmed its competence to assess both compliance with formal requirements and the substantive, entrenched constitutional principles of federalism and constitutional principles of federalism and human dignity.

The French Conseil constitutionnel considers itself to have no competence to review constitutional amendments, in the absence of an express mandate.

In the last 48 hours the Ohio Senate has introduced and approved on a 34 - 0 vote a constitutional amendment (SJR 9) to create a Public Office Compensation Commission «to review the current compensation of each elected public official in the state» including judges.

The constitutional amendment would set up a Citizens» Commission on Salaries for Certain Elected Officers that would take over from the (advisory) Commission to Review the Compensation of Constitutional Officers, Legislators, Supreme Court Justices, Judges of the Court of Appeals, District Judges and Elected Coconstitutional amendment would set up a Citizens» Commission on Salaries for Certain Elected Officers that would take over from the (advisory) Commission to Review the Compensation of Constitutional Officers, Legislators, Supreme Court Justices, Judges of the Court of Appeals, District Judges and Elected CoConstitutional Officers, Legislators, Supreme Court Justices, Judges of the Court of Appeals, District Judges and Elected County Officers.

But when the standard of review for First Amendment claims varies between courts and administrative agencies, constitutional protections become vulnerable to inconsistencies.

With a big hat tip to CAAFlog, it appears that CAAF last Friday granted review in Ali, and the first of three issues presented is the constitutional elephant in the room, i.e.,» [W] hether the military judge erred in ruling that the court had jurisdiction to try [Ali] and thereby violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments by refusing to dismiss the charges and specifications.»

Moving on to privacy rights of a Constitutional nature, Jotwell (the Journal of Things We Like (Lots), a relatively new publication which is to law review articles what Blawg Review is to blawg posts, takes a look at group searches and Fourth Amendment rreview articles what Blawg Review is to blawg posts, takes a look at group searches and Fourth Amendment rReview is to blawg posts, takes a look at group searches and Fourth Amendment rights.

We do not interpret Constitutional case law as supporting the view that a federal agency's review of information pursuant to statutory mandate violates the Fifth Amendment protections against forced self incrimination.