The ban worked: A recent systematic
review of studies evaluating access to guns and its association with suicide and homicide identified no relevant studies published since 2005.
A review of studies evaluating court - ordered desegregation concluded that «the circumstantial case linking school segregation to the test score gap is compelling» (Vigdor & Ludwig, 2008, p. 208).
A review of studies evaluating various therapies utilized in rehabilitation from anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery provides additional support for guidelines issued by a multi-center group of 20 clinicians in 2001 (dubbed the MOON guidelines), and establishes that most have a sound basis in science.
Not exact matches
The IARC
evaluates substances suspected
of causing cancer in humans, and arrives at its classifications by convening a working group
of international experts to
review and assess the strength and quality
of the evidence — in this case, more than 800
studies.
The present
review evaluates the evidence for such a complex system by investigating
studies in which interventions such as elevated temperature, altered oxygen content
of the air, reduced fuel availability and misinformation about distance covered have resulted in alterations to the pacing strategy.
For this debut issue, the Journal
of Attachment Parenting highlights 41
studies selected through a
review process that
evaluated articles published in high - quality, peer -
reviewed journals from around the world.
None
of the funds made available by this Act may be used to implement an interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act
of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that --(1) requires crediting
of tomato paste and puree based on volume; (2) implements a sodium reduction target beyond Target I, the 2 - year target, specified in Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking, «Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs» (FNS — 2007 — 0038, RIN 0584 — AD59) until the Secretary certifies that the Department has
reviewed and
evaluated relevant scientific
studies and data relevant to the relationship
of sodium reductions to human health; and (3) establishes any whole grain requirement without defining «whole grain.»
NHERI executes,
evaluates, and disseminates
studies and information (e.g., statistics, facts, data) on homeschooling (i.e., home schooling, home - based education, home education, home school, home - schooling, unschooling, deschooling, a form
of alternative education), publishes reports and the peer -
reviewed scholarly journal Home School Researcher, and serves in consulting, academic achievement tests, and expert witness (in courts and legislatures).
Declan Devane is a co-author in one
of the included trials in this
review (Begley 2011) Jane Sandall was and is principal investigator for two
studies evaluating models
of midwife - led continuity
of care (Sandall 2001), and co-investigator on the «Birthplace in England Research Programme», an integrated programme
of research designed to compare outcomes
of births for women planned at home, in different types
of midwifery units, and in hospital units with obstetric services.
This is believed to be the first
study to use a rigorous nutritional analysis to
evaluate healthfulness
of food and drinks marketed by music stars,
reviewing dozens
of advertisements that were disseminated over a 14 - year period.
This
study was a systematic
review that
evaluated published research investigations that have directly measured the calorie cost
of yoga and calculated the metabolic intensity (METS)
of individual yoga poses including a popular sequence called «sun salutations.»
The
study, published in the Proceedings
of the National Academy
of Sciences,
evaluated existing peer
reviewed studies on the impact
of marine reserves around the world.
In this article, Dr David Kristensen and colleagues from Copenhagen University Hospital,
review the findings from three individual rodent
studies that
evaluated the effects
of paracetamol taken during pregnancy on the development
of the reproductive system in female offspring.
In 2006 the American Psychological Association (APA) assembled a task force
of researchers with wide - ranging expertise to
evaluate all peer -
reviewed studies published in English since 1989 (when the last such
review was conducted) that compared the mental health
of women who had an abortion with that
of other women.
The
review included data from 17
studies on various aspects
of problem gambling published between 2002 and 2015 — ranging from
evaluating treatment effectiveness, to GA / / culture characteristics and differences in gender experiences.
Lee and Moher suggest that large experimental
studies are needed to judge the effectiveness
of different web - based peer
review templates to enforce reporting standards, and
of ways one might train authors, reviewers and editors to use such tools and
evaluate research.
In a
review of existing literature, Marteau did find descriptions
of nudging being used to improve health behaviors — one
study reports a 70 % increase in the amount
of fruit bought by school children at lunchtime after fruit was placed by the cash register — but these interventions have not been
evaluated on a large scale or assessed for cost - effectiveness.
The USPSTF based its recommendations on a meta - analysis
of 136 clinical trials, observational
studies and a systematic
review evaluating the effects
of supplementation on fracture and cancer risk.
Of the 32 studies included in the review, there were 22 analyses evaluating the economic benefits of long - and intermediate - acting insuli
Of the 32
studies included in the
review, there were 22 analyses
evaluating the economic benefits
of long - and intermediate - acting insuli
of long - and intermediate - acting insulin.
These findings are generally consistent with those from recent systematic
reviews, some
of which also included trials
of statins for secondary prevention.47,51 - 53 Similar to other meta - analyses
of primary and secondary prevention trials, 54,55 this
review found no association between use
of statins and increased risk
of muscle - related harms, although some observational
studies and randomized rechallenge trials found statins associated with increased risk
of myopathy or joint - related symptoms.56 - 58 The large HOPE - 3 trial found statins associated with increased risk
of cataract surgery, an unanticipated finding.14 No other trial
of statins for primary prevention
evaluated risk
of cataracts or cataract surgery.
For instance, the 2015 session on
evaluating research development services helped me to take a leap forward in developing metrics and methods for
evaluating our own services, and the session sharing findings from comparative
study of proposal
review criteria at federal agencies has translated to remarkable efficiencies for myself and my faculty.
Two independent reviewers
evaluated the abstracts for inclusion,
reviewed full texts
of eligible
studies, and abstracted data.
However, when 50 children were
evaluated with the Autism Diagnostic Interview — Revised 35 and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule — Generic, 36 94 % met criteria for ASD on both instruments, and 100 % met criteria on at least 1 instrument.37 Record -
review validation
studies conducted by the investigators demonstrate that the predictors
of valid ASD diagnoses were having more than 2 diagnoses in the medical record.38 Most influenza infections in our
study were determined from International Classification
of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic codes rather than serologic evidence.
CSR organizes the peer
review groups or
study sections that
evaluate the majority (70 %)
of the research grant applications sent to NIH.
In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director
of NIH, impaneled a group
of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several
of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support
of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support
of training in clinical research, and the establishment
of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring
of NIH peer
review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be
evaluated by
study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.
We encourage readers to
evaluate the rationale for the discussion
of biases within the
studies as these represent a critical component — transparency —
of the systematic
review methodology.
Another systematic
review limited to primary prevention trials also found no association with increased risk
of diabetes (4 trials; RR, 1.05 [95 % CI, 0.84 to 1.32]-RRB-.48 However, individual trials were inconsistent, with 1 large trial (JUPITER) reporting an increased risk (3.0 % vs 2.4 %; RR, 1.25 [95 % CI, 1.05 to 1.49]-RRB-.29 The JUPITER
study was the only primary prevention trial reporting diabetes risk that
evaluated high - potency statin therapy.
In a
review article
of 107 published research
studies designed to
evaluate changes in weight among adults using low - carbohydrate diets in the outpatient setting, Bravata (8) found that weight loss while using low - carbohydrate diets was principally associated with decreased caloric intake and increased diet duration, but not with reduced carbohydrate content.
But when the researchers
reviewed scientific literature on the bioactivity
of chamomile, they discovered no human clinical
studies which
evaluated this calming effect.
The relationship between too much salt intake and cardiovascular disease was confirmed in a large
review study published in the «British Medical Journal» in 2009, in which more than 177,000 human subjects were
evaluated for their salt intake and incidence
of heart disease and stroke.
The epidemiological
studies evaluating the risk
of spontaneous abortion from caffeine exposure, as
reviewed by Peck1 and Brent2 have been inconsistent.
Lee and colleagues conducted an overview
of 10 systematic
reviews that
evaluated the efficacy
of aromatherapy (with and without massage) in reducing hypertension, depression, anxiety, pain relief, and symptoms
of dementia.26 The authors determined that, though three
of the
reviews were
of good methodological quality, many
of the primary
studies they
evaluated were not.
Design: A systematic
review of the published literature through January 2015 was performed by using sensitive search strategies to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that
evaluated the effects
of fasting on either clinically relevant surrogate outcomes (e.g., weight, cholesterol) or actual clinical event endpoints [e.g., diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD)-RSB- and any other
studies that
evaluated the effects
of fasting on clinical event outcomes.
In
evaluating the adaptogenic properties
of Siberian ginseng, a large
study reviewed the results
of a number
of clinical trials involving 2,100 healthy men and women ages 19 to 72.
When the American Academy
of Environmental Medicine
evaluated the animal feeding
studies, he peer
reviewed public
studies on GMOs, they found that the animals that were fed GMOs, compared to the controls, suffered from gastrointestinal problems.
To specifically address these questions, recent
review articles published in influential, peer -
reviewed publications were selected for this current discussion, as these
review articles rigorously
evaluate and summarize findings across a number
of scientific
studies and provide the overall «state
of knowledge.»
Instead
of reviewing studies that
evaluate the program, we are left to guess at its likely effect on children.
During an introductory session in the first year
of the
study, the preservice teachers discussed their students» needs, explored iPad apps, and
reviewed a rubric that they could use to
evaluate the apps (Walker, 2011).
In his
review of implementation
studies, O'Toole (2000) encountered a «bewildering array
of variables» that scholars have used to identify, measure, and
evaluate activities that are in some ways related to implementation.
To answer our third research question, we carefully examined which
of several possible methodological and procedural features were associated with better outcomes, although some variables could not be
evaluated in each
review because
of the way the
studies were conducted and reported.
Although numerous
reviews have examined the credibility
of climate researchers (Anderegg et al. 2010), the scientific consensus on climate change (Doran and Kendall Zimmerman 2009) and the complexity
of media reporting (Corner et al. 2012), few
studies have undertaken an empirical
review of the publication record to
evaluate the existence
of publication biases in climate change science.
One recent
study, for example, presented a thorough and careful scrutiny
of hundreds
of peer -
reviewed scientific publications
evaluating the accuracy and capability
of climate models to simulate the response
of a number
of important climatic phenomena to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
The
review of studies examines how NERC reliability authorities, including local and regional transmission planners and operators, have
evaluated potential impacts
of the CPP.
In addition, the
review includes commentary on human
studies that have
evaluated effects related to exposures to low frequency sound and infra sound and proposed mechanisms
of action.
The
review study found that high - resolution mixed layer ocean models can represent some
of the complicated air - sea interactions and recommended that scientists use coupled simulations and
evaluate them in terms
of the observed relationship between convection and sea surface temperature and associated variables.
Of all the points made by S&N, perhaps the most telling is in a follow - up post on the Breakthrough Institute blog: «Nearly every profession, from public health to business to law, has research
studies, conferences, and peer -
review journals dedicated to
evaluating what's working and what's not.
The most comprehensive peer -
reviewed studies done by independent scientists
evaluate air pollution, worker safety, and all
of the other risks in energy production and find that nuclear is safer than coal, oil, natural gas, and even solar.20, 21
CAP said that its
study was based on data from the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, a test administered to students every two years by the U.S. Department
of Education, as well as a state - by - state
review of state department
of education websites to see if states had
evaluated the return on their technology - related spending.
Determines training requirements by
studying sales and marketing strategic plans and current sales results; conferring with sales executives;
reviewing results
of trainer coaching;
evaluating training effectiveness.
AREAS
OF EXPERTISE Organising shipments Warehouse management Distribution management Inventory management Waste management Logistics processes
Reviewing supply networks
Evaluating quotations Preparing contracts Administration Operational performance ACADEMIC QUALIFICATIONS University name - Degree details
Study Dates College name - Qualifications
Study Dates School name - Subjects / Grades
Study Dates